KidViciou$
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 1999
- 4,998
- 0
- 0
i requested a few times that he further explain his post, but he doesn't even acknowledge my requests. either i'm invisible or he's just being an idiot and looking for a fight
Originally posted by: element
You're right it's like peeing into the wind talking to a bunch of 13 year old weenies with no comprehension skills whatsoever.
A. stfu.
B. piss off.
C go f_ yourself in bed with a friggin dirty old sock around your 2" trouser buddy.
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: element
You're right it's like peeing into the wind talking to a bunch of 13 year old weenies with no comprehension skills whatsoever.
A. stfu.
B. piss off.
C go f_ yourself in bed with a friggin dirty old sock around your 2" trouser buddy.
Suggesting some of that stuff to a 13 year old could be grounds for some serious charges being leveled against you. Are you prepared to face those consequences?
Originally posted by: sierrita
Originally posted by: element
Originally posted by: sierrita
Originally posted by: element
Originally posted by: kogase
Guy makes preposterous argument. People point this out. Guy goes a little crazy. Hilarity ensues.
If it is so preposterous, why can't you talk about why it is so? Calling it preposterous serves no more purpose than me calling you a bufoon. how about some reasoning as to why you think so?
You seem to really like peeing into the wind tonight...rough day?
A. Hot bath.
B. Heavy meds.
C. Go to bed.
You're right it's like peeing into the wind talking to a bunch of 13 year old weenies with no comprehension skills whatsoever.
A. stfu.
B. piss off.
C go f_ yourself in bed with a friggin dirty old sock around your 2" trouser buddy.
I'm a girl, you creep.
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
i requested a few times that he further explain his post, but he doesn't even acknowledge my requests. either i'm invisible or he's just being an idiot and looking for a fight
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
i requested a few times that he further explain his post, but he doesn't even acknowledge my requests. either i'm invisible or he's just being an idiot and looking for a fight
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
i requested a few times that he further explain his post, but he doesn't even acknowledge my requests. either i'm invisible or he's just being an idiot and looking for a fight
Yes, he seems to be in it for the insults...
Sets up a flame-bait thread and sits back and makes enemies of all.
Fairly common syndrome.
Originally posted by: element
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
i requested a few times that he further explain his post, but he doesn't even acknowledge my requests. either i'm invisible or he's just being an idiot and looking for a fight
If you don't get it, there is no sense in trying to explain it to you. You won't be able to add anything to the discussion.
Originally posted by: element
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
i requested a few times that he further explain his post, but he doesn't even acknowledge my requests. either i'm invisible or he's just being an idiot and looking for a fight
Yes, he seems to be in it for the insults...
Sets up a flame-bait thread and sits back and makes enemies of all.
Fairly common syndrome.
It wasn't a flame bait thread until you flaming tards turned it into a flamefest from lack of proper social skills. Figures.
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
btw, if the attacks in other countries were because of iraq solely, why wasn't the US hit? the reason why is because it's not just about iraq. the terrorists see it as an attack on islam. the reason we weren't hit is because it takes much more planning to hit us than other countries
and condoleeza rice even said that there was no link between al-qaeda and sadaam hussein. instead of attempting to think you should listen to the news every once in a whiel
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
btw, if the attacks in other countries were because of iraq solely, why wasn't the US hit? the reason why is because it's not just about iraq. the terrorists see it as an attack on islam. the reason we weren't hit is because it takes much more planning to hit us than other countries
and condoleeza rice even said that there was no link between al-qaeda and sadaam hussein. instead of attempting to think you should listen to the news every once in a whiel
:laugh:Originally posted by: umbrella39
Originally posted by: element
So I'm thinkin...
Suggestion, take a day off from thinking.
Originally posted by: element
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
btw, if the attacks in other countries were because of iraq solely, why wasn't the US hit? the reason why is because it's not just about iraq. the terrorists see it as an attack on islam. the reason we weren't hit is because it takes much more planning to hit us than other countries
and condoleeza rice even said that there was no link between al-qaeda and sadaam hussein. instead of attempting to think you should listen to the news every once in a whiel
well at least you gave it a try. I give you props for that. So you finally did get it, what I was saying? Now that wasn't so hard was it? You might actually get some respect now. Go figure.
I will answer like this: You should not only listen to the news every once in a while, but think for yourself as well. At no point in time did I mention anything about Saddam Hussein. He is out of the picture now. My statement was trying to back up a link between the terrorists and Iraq. By that I mean The Iraqi people. People who reside or did once reside in Iraq.
As for why we weren't hit. I don't presume to know why the terrorists choose the targets they choose, and when they choose them. Perhaps as you said because security in the U.S. is tighter now since 911. Besides the terrorists did lop off the heads of some U.S. citizens abroad, so in part, your statement of why we weren't terrorized post 911 isn't true. We were.
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: element
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
btw, if the attacks in other countries were because of iraq solely, why wasn't the US hit? the reason why is because it's not just about iraq. the terrorists see it as an attack on islam. the reason we weren't hit is because it takes much more planning to hit us than other countries
and condoleeza rice even said that there was no link between al-qaeda and sadaam hussein. instead of attempting to think you should listen to the news every once in a whiel
well at least you gave it a try. I give you props for that. So you finally did get it, what I was saying? Now that wasn't so hard was it? You might actually get some respect now. Go figure.
I will answer like this: You should not only listen to the news every once in a while, but think for yourself as well. At no point in time did I mention anything about Saddam Hussein. He is out of the picture now. My statement was trying to back up a link between the terrorists and Iraq. By that I mean The Iraqi people. People who reside or did once reside in Iraq.
As for why we weren't hit. I don't presume to know why the terrorists choose the targets they choose, and when they choose them. Perhaps as you said because security in the U.S. is tighter now since 911. Besides the terrorists did lop off the heads of some U.S. citizens abroad, so in part, your statement of why we weren't terrorized post 911 isn't true. We were.
Pretzel-Logic.
I think he's drunk.
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
how could the iraqi people be in cohoots with the terrorists? they would need a "point man"
and like i said, the terrorists are "fighting" for the iraqis, whether they like it or not...t
When did the US invade Iraq? Hmm???BBC News Online collects news, analysis and features from the terror attack in Bali on 12 October, 2002
Originally posted by: conjur
This thread needs to be locked just for sheer stupidity.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/asia_pacific/2002/bali/default.stmWhen did the US invade Iraq? Hmm???BBC News Online collects news, analysis and features from the terror attack in Bali on 12 October, 2002
Originally posted by: element
Originally posted by: KidViciou$
how could the iraqi people be in cohoots with the terrorists? they would need a "point man"
and like i said, the terrorists are "fighting" for the iraqis, whether they like it or not...t
Exactly. the terrorists are fighting for the Iraqis. Why would they do that if there were no ties between them? That is all I was trying to say.
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: conjur
This thread needs to be locked just for sheer stupidity.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/asia_pacific/2002/bali/default.stmWhen did the US invade Iraq? Hmm???BBC News Online collects news, analysis and features from the terror attack in Bali on 12 October, 2002
What? Haven't you been following this?
It is WE who are stupid and cannot follow the simple indisputable logic of element.
We All should be banned...NOT HIM!
Originally posted by: element
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Originally posted by: element
So I'm thinkin...
Suggestion, take a day off from thinking.
Like you could do better. Suggestion, stfu. k? thx.