Iron Man 3: Currently 78% at RT.com (Post reviews here!)

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
197
106
IM3 sucked.

Probably the worst marvel movie to date, except maybe the punisher and daredevil.

~ EDIT ~

I take that back, Daredevil was better than IM3.
 

jimbob200521

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2005
4,108
29
91
IM3 sucked.

Probably the worst marvel movie to date, except maybe the punisher and daredevil.

~ EDIT ~

I take that back, Daredevil was better than IM3.

The hell it was, Daredevil was mediocre crap, in my opinion at least. The only redeeming quality for it was Michael Clarke Duncan as the villain. Not that Iron Man 3 was the hit everyone hoped it would be, but it's sure better than Daredevil.
 

badb0y

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2010
4,015
30
91
Criticism of movie Mandarin based on how different he was from comic book Mandarin makes me laugh. Exactly 0.0000000000135% of people who saw the move actually read the relevant comic book (on ATOT more like 90%), therefore they don't care about the differences and they will tell their friends how great the movie was and it will make dump trucks full of money. Were they supposed to spend forever explaining crash landed aliens from planet Whothehellcares and their magic rings just to make internet nerds happy?
:::::::::::SPOLIERS::::::::::::::
What are you talking about man? I said I was liking the terrorist Mandarin because he was a compelling villain. I DIDN'T like the fact that they went on and exposed him as an actor and joke. I don't care about his powers or his rings or anything about that, I just hate how they take a really good character and turn him into crap.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,599
19
81
...
...Tony blows up all his suits? WTF? It's all over?

Then at the end Tony gets his arc reactor taken out and he tosses it into the ocean? WTF?
...
- He blew up his suits, but he's also evidently got the ability to build multiple suits.
- So he threw a piece of his virtually-indestructible technology into some saltwater. I think that could be located and retrieved at a later time.
 

RedCOMET

Platinum Member
Jul 8, 2002
2,837
0
0
:::::::::::SPOLIERS::::::::::::::
What are you talking about man? I said I was liking the terrorist Mandarin because he was a compelling villain. I DIDN'T like the fact that they went on and exposed him as an actor and joke. I don't care about his powers or his rings or anything about that, I just hate how they take a really good character and turn him into crap.

I never read the comics or anything, but I felt cheated that they made the mandarin some actor who could barely speak in complete sentences. Knowing what I read about the character on Wikipedia, I felt that they could have used the villain in a more compelling and elegant manner. Instead we got theatrics. He seemed sophisticated according Wikipedia, but instead we got guy pierce who was motivated by greed and pettiness, and nothing else
... He seemed shallow.
 

preslove

Lifer
Sep 10, 2003
16,755
63
91
I finally saw it.

Everyone complaining about the deviation from the comics is an idiot. It was a fairly fun popcorn flick. The only really annoying thing was the deuce ex machina at the end with all the suits (fuck you about spoilers, it's in the goddamn trailers), when he could have just called the suits to get him an hour before hand.

Other than that major plot hole, it was a great movie. Much better than thor.
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
I finally saw it.

Everyone complaining about the deviation from the comics is an idiot. It was a fairly fun popcorn flick. The only really annoying thing was the deuce ex machina at the end with all the suits (fuck you about spoilers, it's in the goddamn trailers), when he could have just called the suits to get him an hour before hand.

Other than that major plot hole, it was a great movie. Much better than thor.

For someone that gives people shit about not liking them ruining a potentially awesome villain (The Mandarin) to only prop up a shitty villain (Killian), you then try and act all high and mighty by declaring a plot hole that doesn't exist. You do recall that he specifically mentions that the debris was cleared that was blocking the basement (or whatever he calls it)? The circular door that was where his platform originally was had to open before the "Iron Army" could come out, and that door was blocked.

 

preslove

Lifer
Sep 10, 2003
16,755
63
91
For someone that gives people shit about not liking them ruining a potentially awesome villain (The Mandarin) to only prop up a shitty villain (Killian), you then try and act all high and mighty by declaring a plot hole that doesn't exist. You do recall that he specifically mentions that the debris was cleared that was blocking the basement (or whatever he calls it)? The circular door that was where his platform originally was had to open before the "Iron Army" could come out, and that door was blocked.


The mandarin is a lame, cliche comicbook villain that would have translated into an even worse movie villain. Are you actually a Iron Man comicbook fan? I'm a pretty big marvel comics fan, and I don't give a fuck about the mandarin. You have to be a rather pathetic nerd to be pissed about this, especially since Ben Kingsly was pretty funny once we finally meet him.

I'm pretty sure a couple dozen iron man suits could have blasted their way out of the basement in a couple hours, and Tony Stark would never be short sited enough to only have one exit for the suits.
 
Last edited:

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
The mandarin is a lame, cliche comicbook villain that would have translated into an even worse movie villain. Are you actually a Iron Man comicbook fan? I'm a pretty big marvel comics fan, and I don't give a fuck about the mandarin. You have to be a rather pathetic nerd to be pissed about this, especially since Ben Kingsly was pretty funny once we finally meet him.

I just read comics (DC, Marvel, whatever), but mostly manga. Anyway, I didn't care so much about how they changed The Mandarin. I mentioned it before, but my qualms were more about their original presentation of The Mandarin made you think you might be getting a decent villain in an Iron Man movie for once. Their twist did nothing more than remove that from the cards, and all Marvel had left was a lame villain in Aldrich Killian.

I'm pretty sure a couple dozen iron man suits could have blasted their way out of the basement in a couple hours, and Tony Stark would never be short sited enough to only have one exit for the suits.

Well, we're trying to debate non-existent mental concepts for a comic book, so we're really just going to toss around a bunch of "I think..." statements all day. If I had to guess, he wasn't able to communicate with the various Iron Man suits until the door was clear. Also, I think it's more like Tony only created one entrance to the room rather than one exit. That's arguably (and logically) the same thing, but I mean more or less why he would do that. The government was adamant in Iron Man 2 about Tony turning over his suit, so he wants to ensure he's the only one that has one. If someone took one... especially someone evil... then it would be a rehash of Iron Man 1 where evil-doers had access to his high-tech weaponry.
 

CZroe

Lifer
Jun 24, 2001
24,195
856
126
For someone that gives people shit about not liking them ruining a potentially awesome villain (The Mandarin) to only prop up a shitty villain (Killian), you then try and act all high and mighty by declaring a plot hole that doesn't exist. You do recall that he specifically mentions that the debris was cleared that was blocking the basement (or whatever he calls it)? The circular door that was where his platform originally was had to open before the "Iron Army" could come out, and that door was blocked.


And before that he had to get his busted armor working to contact Jarvis.
 

preslove

Lifer
Sep 10, 2003
16,755
63
91
I just read comics (DC, Marvel, whatever), but mostly manga. Anyway, I didn't care so much about how they changed The Mandarin. I mentioned it before, but my qualms were more about their original presentation of The Mandarin made you think you might be getting a decent villain in an Iron Man movie for once. Their twist did nothing more than remove that from the cards, and all Marvel had left was a lame villain in Aldrich Killian.

I liked the supersoldier concept a lot more than the overdone style of the original stan lee villain and his dumb permutaton in iron man lore. Plus, giving pepper pots powers is pretty great. p

Well, we're trying to debate non-existent mental concepts for a comic book, so we're really just going to toss around a bunch of "I think..." statements all day. If I had to guess, he wasn't able to communicate with the various Iron Man suits until the door was clear. Also, I think it's more like Tony only created one entrance to the room rather than one exit. That's arguably (and logically) the same thing, but I mean more or less why he would do that. The government was adamant in Iron Man 2 about Tony turning over his suit, so he wants to ensure he's the only one that has one. If someone took one... especially someone evil... then it would be a rehash of Iron Man 1 where evil-doers had access to his high-tech weaponry.

Did they actually make the idea that the debris on-top of opening prevented the iron man suits from coming out explicit? If so, do you remember when?
 

Daverino

Platinum Member
Mar 15, 2007
2,004
1
0
The movie was an incoherent mess. I don't even know where to begin. . . It was the Prometheus of Marvel Comic movies.
 

Aikouka

Lifer
Nov 27, 2001
30,383
912
126
Ultimately, I think my opinion is this... if I want to see a good Shane Black movie with Robert Downey Jr., I will just watch Kiss Kiss Bang Bang.

I liked the supersoldier concept a lot more than the overdone style of the original stan lee villain and his dumb permutaton in iron man lore. Plus, giving pepper pots powers is pretty great. p

I don't have any qualms with there being a super soldier thing. Hell, the whole super soldier concept has been very pervasive in the Marvel universe ever since Captain America. I was reading Ultimate Spider-Man this past weekend, and Nick Fury was even telling Peter Parker about that. It's not that super soldiers are bad, but just that Killian wasn't very interesting.

The problem with giving Pepper Pots powers (close to a tongue twister!) is that anyone that didn't turn their brain off yet would realize that she wasn't going to die when she fell. I've always liked movies that can evoke emotions through their scenes, and having a villain kill off a character usually works really well.

Did they actually make the idea that the debris on-top of opening prevented the iron man suits from coming out explicit? If so, do you remember when?

I'd have to see it again to be sure. However, I recall Jarvis telling Tony that they were finally about to clear the debris from "the basement" (I think he called it something like that). They showed a cleaning crew removing this huge chunk of concrete, and once it was removed, the door started opening. Then you see all of the arc reactors activate (the blue circles in the dark).
 

Zeze

Lifer
Mar 4, 2011
11,210
1,079
126
In order to review Iron Man 3, I'll have to rate previous movies to show where I'm coming from.

Iron Man 1: [9/10] It was the 'dark' (quite accurately) time for super hero movies. They were all cliche as hell, and I was getting tired of the brooding, miserable emos who were crying about their gift with a heavy burden (Batman, Spiderman, etc). Thankfully RDJ came along as Iron Man and blew everyone away with the snarky egotistical attitude. In the big screen world, this was new and refreshing. The movie was wholesome and handled the origin story very well. I was laughing, cheering, and smiling throughout. The movie was funny, witty, and smart. It was without a doubt the best action movie of that year.

Iron Man 2: [7/10] Bloated and contrived. The movie blatantly felt like a lazy money grab. Also I missed the chemistry between RDJ & Terrance Howard. Don Cheadle is a great actor in his own right, but the change felt abrupt and he never settled properly with me as Rhodey in Iron Man. I've watched Iron Man 1 numerous times. I don't even think I saw 2 again outside of the theater.

The Avengers: [6.5/10] This was the biggest cliched pile of crap I've seen on recent memory. Given the wide roster, it couldn't escape from being a 90-minute fan service with each heroes having spotlight moments, then all coming together to defeat the big bad guy. It was predictable, predictable, and predictable. Now I don't mind watching mindless action flicks, but at the end of the day, it just has to entertain me. This movie failed at it.

Iron Man 3: The writers tried to get out of the comic book formula a little. And I thoroughly appreciated them all. It made for a refreshing change since IM2 & Avengers. I haven't felt that word- refreshing since watching Iron Man 1. I'll tell you why:

-Today's audience have a better modern imagination than that of the 90's and 00's. One man in a suit fighting one big villain is getting boring. And Iron Man 3 took a better approach with Mandarin. It was pretty smart for a comic book movie.

-Same goes for Iron Man himself. I really liked how Tony was proving himself without a suit or a partial suit half the time. It wasn't the same crap of punching villains in the suit as seen in IM1, 2, or Avengers. It only got better with different suits and when Pepper had her little moment.

It's a solid movie. I loved the non-cliche dialogue between Tony and the kid. It was full of wit. I can see the purist comic book nerds hating on the movie because of the liberties the movie took. How sad for them.

8.5/10.
 

GTaudiophile

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
29,776
31
81
Saw it and enjoyed it. I would rate it above 2 I suppose.

Specific comments...

-I thought the movie was best until we find out that the Mandarin is Trevor.
Ben Kingsly was doing a respectable job until then.
-They never do a good job of explaining how Extremis not only allows regenerative limbs but also creates so much heat and how it is controlled.
-The botanist girl seems to have been infused with Extremis but dies from one bullet shot??? WTF!
-Parts of me wanted the Mandarin to fuck up the President and his administration. He deserved it.
-The Iron Man suit fest extravaganza at the end was a bit stupid. But so was the T1000-like indestructibility of the bad guys.
-I hate how they made the news truck have the interior room of a semi! (Where Tony and the news guy hack into AIM.)
-Too bad about his house. I love that design!
 

Doppel

Lifer
Feb 5, 2011
13,306
3
0
I saw this and was disappointed, it's certainly the weakest of the Iron Man movies.

It was just quite forgettable. Some truly stupid parts:

- worst, stupidest part for sure and by a wide margin was when he saved all those people from the plane. I was embarrassed to be watching it and it was just fucking ridiculous
- this is a tiny bit but when he is in the news van and needs more juice and tells some guy to get on the roof and calibrate the ISDNs, this shit is pathetic. In 2013 we should not accept such nonsensical crap from movies about IT stuff, even a lay person knows that made no sense
- As GT audio said, once it was discovered Mandarin wasn't real the movie for me got massively less interesting
- Why did he blow up all his robots at the end? Because they were a "distraction"? That's just stupid. It was only because in the next ironman they want it to be him alone against somebody.
- When he flew in front of an 18 wheeler and the suit was destroyed (he would have been if he was in it at the time, but it was remote), for a guy who's fought aliens and all this other shit that was a newbie mistake
- The movie concentrated on his anxiety for a while, building it, and then it was "cured" by him making some gadgets. Weak

Was just not a great movie, it was watchable once and not more.

I liked Iron man 2 better and the first one was the best super hero movie to come out in a very damn long time.
 

preslove

Lifer
Sep 10, 2003
16,755
63
91
In order to review Iron Man 3, I'll have to rate previous movies to show where I'm coming from.

Iron Man 1: [9/10] It was the 'dark' (quite accurately) time for super hero movies. They were all cliche as hell, and I was getting tired of the brooding, miserable emos who were crying about their gift with a heavy burden (Batman, Spiderman, etc). Thankfully RDJ came along as Iron Man and blew everyone away with the snarky egotistical attitude. In the big screen world, this was new and refreshing. The movie was wholesome and handled the origin story very well. I was laughing, cheering, and smiling throughout. The movie was funny, witty, and smart. It was without a doubt the best action movie of that year.

Iron Man 2: [7/10] Bloated and contrived. The movie blatantly felt like a lazy money grab. Also I missed the chemistry between RDJ & Terrance Howard. Don Cheadle is a great actor in his own right, but the change felt abrupt and he never settled properly with me as Rhodey in Iron Man. I've watched Iron Man 1 numerous times. I don't even think I saw 2 again outside of the theater.

The Avengers: [6.5/10] This was the biggest cliched pile of crap I've seen on recent memory. Given the wide roster, it couldn't escape from being a 90-minute fan service with each heroes having spotlight moments, then all coming together to defeat the big bad guy. It was predictable, predictable, and predictable. Now I don't mind watching mindless action flicks, but at the end of the day, it just has to entertain me. This movie failed at it.

Iron Man 3: The writers tried to get out of the comic book formula a little. And I thoroughly appreciated them all. It made for a refreshing change since IM2 & Avengers. I haven't felt that word- refreshing since watching Iron Man 1. I'll tell you why:

-Today's audience have a better modern imagination than that of the 90's and 00's. One man in a suit fighting one big villain is getting boring. And Iron Man 3 took a better approach with Mandarin. It was pretty smart for a comic book movie.

-Same goes for Iron Man himself. I really liked how Tony was proving himself without a suit or a partial suit half the time. It wasn't the same crap of punching villains in the suit as seen in IM1, 2, or Avengers. It only got better with different suits and when Pepper had her little moment.

It's a solid movie. I loved the non-cliche dialogue between Tony and the kid. It was full of wit. I can see the purist comic book nerds hating on the movie because of the liberties the movie took. How sad for them.

8.5/10.

:thumbsup: Though, I'd put Avengers higher. It's a dumb popcorn flick that was done really well. Of course there'll be tons of cliches. It's a super hero team up movie. It could have been done MUCH worse.
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,892
2,135
126
- Why did he blow up all his robots at the end? Because they were a "distraction"? That's just stupid. It was only because in the next ironman they want it to be him alone against somebody.
- When he flew in front of an 18 wheeler and the suit was destroyed (he would have been if he was in it at the time, but it was remote), for a guy who's fought aliens and all this other shit that was a newbie mistake
- The movie concentrated on his anxiety for a while, building it, and then it was "cured" by him making some gadgets. Weak[/spoiler]

Was just not a great movie, it was watchable once and not more.

I liked Iron man 2 better and the first one was the best super hero movie to come out in a very damn long time.

I never understood why we have to use spoiler tags still- if you don't want to know about the movie, don't come into a thread that's a month past a movie's release date

Anyway:

All of those items are related: Tony was suffering from PTSD and hiding behind his armor for comfort. It was to the point that his armors were becoming more Tony than Tony was. He blew them all up at the end because he wanted to take control of himself again- he is Tony Stark, not Iron Man. He wanted to start over. It was actually very poignant.

The suit being hit by the truck was because the suit was being flown by remote, it was a semi-working prototype, and on top of that was damaged. That was a whole plot point--- he was stuck with a suit that didn't work well, forcing him to use his own abilities instead of the suit's.
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,929
142
106
In order to review Iron Man 3, I'll have to rate previous movies to show where I'm coming from.

Iron Man 1: [9/10] It was the 'dark' (quite accurately) time for super hero movies. They were all cliche as hell, and I was getting tired of the brooding, miserable emos who were crying about their gift with a heavy burden (Batman, Spiderman, etc). Thankfully RDJ came along as Iron Man and blew everyone away with the snarky egotistical attitude. In the big screen world, this was new and refreshing. The movie was wholesome and handled the origin story very well. I was laughing, cheering, and smiling throughout. The movie was funny, witty, and smart. It was without a doubt the best action movie of that year.

Iron Man 2: [7/10] Bloated and contrived. The movie blatantly felt like a lazy money grab. Also I missed the chemistry between RDJ & Terrance Howard. Don Cheadle is a great actor in his own right, but the change felt abrupt and he never settled properly with me as Rhodey in Iron Man. I've watched Iron Man 1 numerous times. I don't even think I saw 2 again outside of the theater.

The Avengers: [6.5/10] This was the biggest cliched pile of crap I've seen on recent memory. Given the wide roster, it couldn't escape from being a 90-minute fan service with each heroes having spotlight moments, then all coming together to defeat the big bad guy. It was predictable, predictable, and predictable. Now I don't mind watching mindless action flicks, but at the end of the day, it just has to entertain me. This movie failed at it.

Iron Man 3: The writers tried to get out of the comic book formula a little. And I thoroughly appreciated them all. It made for a refreshing change since IM2 & Avengers. I haven't felt that word- refreshing since watching Iron Man 1. I'll tell you why:

-Today's audience have a better modern imagination than that of the 90's and 00's. One man in a suit fighting one big villain is getting boring. And Iron Man 3 took a better approach with Mandarin. It was pretty smart for a comic book movie.

-Same goes for Iron Man himself. I really liked how Tony was proving himself without a suit or a partial suit half the time. It wasn't the same crap of punching villains in the suit as seen in IM1, 2, or Avengers. It only got better with different suits and when Pepper had her little moment.

It's a solid movie. I loved the non-cliche dialogue between Tony and the kid. It was full of wit. I can see the purist comic book nerds hating on the movie because of the liberties the movie took. How sad for them.

8.5/10.

I also agree with this. But like pres, I'd put Avengers higher, easily an 8/10. That movie did almost ALL of the characters incredibly well and nailed it (Hulk especially). Really the only part I didn't like about avengers was Black Widow and Hawkeye doing things that were physically impossible but that wasn't a big deal.
 

poofyhairguy

Lifer
Nov 20, 2005
14,612
318
126
Finally saw it today.

I liked that Mandarin was a fake, that was a cool twist. Magic doesn't belong in an Iron Man movie keep that in Thor.

But the actual primary villian was boring. All these plans just to get a defense contract, just makes no sense. And he does it because Tony makes him wait on a roof? Tony screws over half the hot women in the world and this jackwagon hates him for making him enjoy an awesome fireworks show for a few minutes? Its a good thing no women in the Iron Man universe are smart enough to take down Tony. Made me miss Hammer.

And I HATED the ending. The whole point of the second movie is how terrible it would be if someone else got his chest piece, and in the third movie he just throws it off a cliff where it will be easy to find. But I guess the damn thing isn't really that important if it needs a boat battery for a boost.

And many parts of the Lethal Weapon ending got me. "No best friend my suits only work on me (or my GF or my biggest enemy in like three minutes). Go fight the supersoldiers with a gun buddy!"

I liked so much how Avengers set up Iron Man 3 and it was wasted.
 
Last edited:
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |