I'm almost ready to get an SSD, and was looking forward to some nice performing SSD using the new 25nm NAND, but now I'm reading that 25nm is less capable than 34nm ones. But why isn't the price reflecting this? Things have remained largely for past 4 months or so.
For one thing, switching to the smaller 25nm chips meant using half as many chips, which could half the data pathways as well (that's what happened to OCZ). Also I heard with 25nm the usable drive capacity went down, now from 55GB to 50GB. Lastly, the smaller size also supposedly shorten the write endurance "lifespan" of the 25nm NAND.
Yet with all the "advancement" that 25nm this brings us, I don't see much of a price drop in terms of GB/dollar. When will we see cost-benefit be aligned again?
For one thing, switching to the smaller 25nm chips meant using half as many chips, which could half the data pathways as well (that's what happened to OCZ). Also I heard with 25nm the usable drive capacity went down, now from 55GB to 50GB. Lastly, the smaller size also supposedly shorten the write endurance "lifespan" of the 25nm NAND.
Yet with all the "advancement" that 25nm this brings us, I don't see much of a price drop in terms of GB/dollar. When will we see cost-benefit be aligned again?