Originally posted by: VIAN
I have everything turned on at 1280x1024 except V-sync (learned to live without in on LCD's), and I get barely acceptable performance. Frame rates spend about half the time in the low 30's and the other half in the high 20's and in certain areas, they can go down to the low 20's. I didn't play that bad though, until it went down to the low 20's.
Without AA or AF, the framrates spend half the time in the low 40's and half the time in the mid 30's and in certain areas, can go down into the mid 20's.
There are certain areas in the game where lowering the resolution is the only way to get above the mid 20's. Which is probably a glitch in the game, since I'm inside a building in 2 out of 3 of those areas that I've found so far.
Originally posted by: 1Dark1Sharigan1
Hmm you GT should be able to do better than 1024x768 in COD2 or F.E.A.R. It should generally do better at stock than an X800XL in those games. Depending on your proc, a 6800GT should get around 35-40FPS in F.E.A.R. at 12x10 2xAA/8xAF with high settings (no soft shadows, etc.) and OC it should do better. COD2 is actually a bit more taxing than F.E.A.R. I believe as on my system the COD2 Demo has run slower than F.E.A.R. with similar settings (though F.E.A.R. has more slowdowns) though that could just be due to the unfinalized script . . .
I wish my GT got those fps in FEAR with those settings. I had to lower my res to 1024x768 to keep the high settings except soft shadows and still run playable. Although, I made sure there was never an area that gave me less than 30fps.