Is Homosexuality a fundamental freedom and universal human right

[zinfamous]

Yest another THSISBTIWID thread.

(Texas Hiker Something I Support But This Is Why I Don't)

I'm not against vaccines, except that I am.
I'm not against gays, except that I am.

etc

 

[Texashiker]

Gosh, you're a regular fucking renaissance man, you open minded bastard you.

If you only knew the whole truth.

Yest another THSISBTIWID thread.

(Texas Hiker Something I Support But This Is Why I Don't)

I'm not against vaccines, except that I am.
I'm not against gays, except that I am.

etc

When I cut my leg with a chainsaw, what was the first thing I got at the ER?

 

[nageov3t]

When I cut my leg with a chainsaw, what was the first thing I got at the ER?

buttsex?

 

[radtechtips]

No, I am not a "strict constructionist".

If I were, I would have no problem with forced sterilization, and I would have no problem with forced relocation and detainment of US citizens. Both of which happened in the 20th century, and both upheld by the supreme court.

Um do you even know what a "strict constructionist" is

 

[MomentsofSanity]

buttsex?

You just made me laugh out loud at an investor!

 

[Texashiker]

Um do you even know what a "strict constructionist" is

Someone who strictly follows the construction?

 

[radtechtips]

Someone who strictly follows the construction?

Very good. Is abortion in the Constitution? Nope

Is limiting the tights of gays? Nope.

 

[UberNeuman]

buttsex?

 

[MomentsofSanity]

Very good. Is abortion in the Constitution? Nope

Is limiting the tights of gays? Nope.

Wait. Gays can't wear tights now? mother fucker.....

 

[radtechtips]

Wait. Gays can't wear tights now? mother fucker.....

Ah shit. That would be uncalled for. Now their rights on the other hand...

 

[Texashiker]

Very good. Is abortion in the Constitution? Nope

Is limiting the tights of gays? Nope.

Gays are not entitled to tight asses?

Or, are gay prohibited from wearing tights?

What "exactly" are you trying to say?

 

[radtechtips]

Gays are not entitled to tight asses?

Or, are gay prohibited from wearing tights?

What "exactly" are you trying to say?

They have a right to loose assholes.

 

[Atomic Playboy]

buttsex?

/thread

 

[alzan]

Very good. Is abortion in the Constitution? Nope

Is limiting the tights of gays? Nope.

Strictly speaking, no. Roe v. Wade is based in part on the right to privacy which is not specifically spelled out in the Constitution but is implied by other amendments.

I find tights to be limiting and I'm heterosexual.

 

[radtechtips]

Sorry guys you guessed it. I have a latex fetish

 

[Texashiker]

Sorry guys you guessed it. I have a latex fetish

Pics of said fetish?

 

[hal2kilo]

Wow,

3856 posts since 7:15 am yesterday.


When will you all learn to stop feeding this troll.

 

[Texashiker]

When will you all learn to stop feeding this troll.

Hey, we are trying to have an honest discussion if stretching your ass is a civil right.

So far the conciseness is if you are wrapped in latex it is all good.

 

[nageov3t]

I'm not sure I'd want to go down the road of "your behaviors aren't impacting anyone directly but they're driving up medical expenses, therefore we should restrict your rights."

 

[Texashiker]

I'm not sure I'd want to go down the road of "your behaviors aren't impacting anyone directly but they're driving up medical expenses, therefore we should restrict your rights."

Why not?

If I were 17 times more likely to develop heart disease from eating cheeseburgers, which in turn drove up insurance rates, would you be ok with my behavior?

 

[Atomic Playboy]

Why not?

If I were 17 times more likely to develop heart disease from eating cheeseburgers, which in turn drove up insurance rates, would you be ok with my behavior?

Wait, you want to ban cheeseburgers now?

 

[Texashiker]

Wait, you want to ban cheeseburgers now?

Hell no. They are like my favorite food in the whole world.

If a certain behavior has known risk which cost the community as a whole, should that behavior be curtailed?

 

[nageov3t]

Why not?

If I were 17 times more likely to develop heart disease from eating cheeseburgers, which in turn drove up insurance rates, would you be ok with my behavior?

yup, that's your right.

sickle cell disease costs $11,702/year per child (http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/sicklecell/data.html) and occurs overwhelmingly in African American families, but I'm not going to advocate that we stop allowing black people to have kids.

 

[soulcougher73]

Holy crap, did you just say there are valid reasons to complain about obama? According to the liberals here, obama has been a wonderful president who has not done a single thing wrong.

I know its been a cold winter, but surely hell has not frozen over?

Most people here think im a liberal but im only socially liberal. And he has not done much of anything right i my book.

 

[Atomic Playboy]

Hell no. They are like my favorite food in the whole world.

If a certain behavior has known risk which cost the community as a whole, should that behavior be curtailed?

Not if the people harms are engaging in it willingly, no. You can warn people and say, "Hey, anal sex makes you more likely to get HIV or anal cancer." And they can say, "Oh, thanks, I'm still going to do it." That's their right, just as it's your right to eat a cheeseburger, or a smoker's right to inhale burning tobacco or a drinker's right to poison their liver with alcoholic toxins or anyone else's right to engage in activities which may not improve their overall health. Live your life and quit trying to control everyone else's.