Is it discriminatory for an employer to have a nonsmoking hiring policy?

Page 10 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,530
3
0
humm I dunno Red, he may have a valid point. Food Marketing is very powerful not only getting us to buy bad food but getting us hungry to go out and get it. the latest Macaroni grill commercial gets my mouth watering.
So being a weak puke is a valid excuse for being a fat pig?
 

ahurtt

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2001
4,283
0
0
Nobody's telling you what you can or cannot eat. If you aren't a fat pig yet odds are you will be by the time you're 45. Lose weight and we'll stop mocking you and hopefully discriminating against you because your weight and lack of conditioning is driving up the cost of our Health Ins.

Oh look, somebody comparing obesity and smoking. . .wierd. Gee, I haven't already shot that argument down yet or anything. Maybe you're late to the party so I'll reiterate. You have to eat to live. You don't have to smoke to live. I am prone to being overweight because I have a sedentary job and that's why I exercise regularly and don't over eat. See somewhere along the way growing up in my 36 years so far on this planet I learned that the actions we take and choices we make have consequences that we live with sometimes for years, maybe even the rest of our lives. One poor choice tends to lead to another which tends to lead to bad things. And one good choice tends to lead to another which tends to lead to good things. It's a pretty simple concept really. Plant good seed, good things grow. Plant bad seeds, bad things grow. You are the choices you make in your life and you are part of society. We need a society where the net of the choices made is for the good and things like smoking and obesity just seem like no-brainers. But smoking especially. I'll give somebody who loses 50 pounds 10x more credit than I'll give somebody who quits smoking because to lose any appreciable amount of weight you have to actively exercise, change your whole lifestyle and attitude about food, and actively fight a basic and necessary biological urge. . .the urge to eat. Smoking just makes no sense at all to me. . .who has to smoke to sustain their life? It may take mental discipline to quit smoking but fixing your weight requires both physical (continued exercise) and mental discipline (attitude about food) that you sustain for life (assuming you want to do it the right way and remain healthy for life).

But anyway, I thank you for the challenge. I will take your words as a challenge and use them as fuel to make sure that not only do I live to be 45 but that when I do reach that birthday I will weigh no more than I do today. If nothing else, the power of the fear of public humiliation will keep me from becoming a lard-ass in case I ever think of letting myself slip.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,530
3
0
Oh look, somebody comparing obesity and smoking. . .wierd. Gee, I haven't already shot that argument down yet or anything. Maybe you're late to the party so I'll reiterate. You have to eat to live. You don't have to smoke to live. I am prone to being overweight because I have a sedentary job and that's why I exercise regularly and don't over eat. See somewhere along the way growing up in my 36 years so far on this planet I learned that the actions we take and choices we make have consequences that we live with sometimes for years, maybe even the rest of our lives. One poor choice tends to lead to another which tends to lead to bad things. And one good choice tends to lead to another which tends to lead to good things. It's a pretty simple concept really. Plant good seed, good things grow. Plant bad seeds, bad things grow. You are the choices you make in your life and you are part of society. We need a society where the net of the choices made is for the good and things like smoking and obesity just seem like no-brainers. But smoking especially. I'll give somebody who loses 50 pounds 10x more credit than I'll give somebody who quits smoking because to lose any appreciable amount of weight you have to actively exercise, change your whole lifestyle and attitude about food, and actively fight a basic and necessary biological urge. . .the urge to eat. Smoking just makes no sense at all to me. . .who has to smoke to sustain their life? It may take mental discipline to quit smoking but fixing your weight requires both physical (continued exercise) and mental discipline (attitude about food) that you sustain for life (assuming you want to do it the right way and remain healthy for life).
I agree it's tougher to lose weight than it is to stop smoking and humans, especially those like you who feel they are entitled, are usually weak, that's why it's easier to quit smoking than it is to stop being a fast funny looking lard ass.

But anyway, I thank you for the challenge. I will take your words as a challenge and use them as fuel to make sure that not only do I live to be 45 but that when I do reach that birthday I will weigh no more than I do today. If nothing else, the power of the fear of public humiliation will keep me from becoming a lard-ass in case I ever think of letting myself slip.
I bet you fail badly if you are not already a few dozen biscuits out of shape.
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,892
2,135
126
You were talking about your quality of life.

My insurance plan charges more for individuals that have children, there's no reason they couldn't charge more for the smokers, obese, those with a family history of cancer, etc. etc.

So to recap, you smoke, but change your clothes after each smoke, you never smoke in your car or out in public because you can control your urges, and you have some special health insurance that doesn't care if you smoke.

Man, you have it made.
 

ahurtt

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2001
4,283
0
0
I agree it's tougher to lose weight than it is to stop smoking and humans, especially those like you who feel they are entitled, are usually weak, that's why it's easier to quit smoking than it is to stop being a fast funny looking lard ass.

Sorry, you lost me here. I'm not sure I understand what it is you are saying that I think that I think I'm entitled to.

I bet you fail badly if you are not already a few dozen biscuits out of shape.

I know you bet I fail badly. You and plenty of others including the statistics. And that's precisely why I won't fail. I won't give you or the statistics the satisfaction of being right. That and I want to be a grandfather some day. Maybe even a great-grandfather.
BTW, I'm 36 years old, 5'11", and 177 lbs. But I wasn't always. I know what it takes to get where I am now and I have no intention of ever going back.
 
Last edited:

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,413
616
126
So being a weak puke is a valid excuse for being a fat pig?

you have to admit that the amount of food marketing we are subjected to does have a impact on Americas obesity issues. marketing is capitalism at its finest. just watch a football game and count how many beer or food commercials are shown. eat drink eat drink eat drink eat drink... all while sitting on your ass watching a sporting event.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,413
616
126
So to recap, you smoke, but change your clothes after each smoke, you never smoke in your car or out in public because you can control your urges, and you have some special health insurance that doesn't care if you smoke.

Man, you have it made.

my health insurance doesn't care if i smoked or not. i pay the same as everybody else in the company that has the family plan.
 

coloumb

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,096
0
81
Well..you CHOOSE to smoke and you are CHOOSING to go work for that company so you are CHOOSING to abide by their rules/regulations. Smoking isn't a genetic disorder - it's a CHOICE - so it's not discriminatory.

The insurance my company uses provides a $25.00 discount for non-smokers.

Get use to it - smoking isn't cool anymore - and each day more and more people would rather be working in a smoke free environment.
 

Blackjack200

Lifer
May 28, 2007
15,995
1,685
126
So to recap, you smoke, but change your clothes after each smoke, you never smoke in your car or out in public because you can control your urges, and you have some special health insurance that doesn't care if you smoke.

Man, you have it made.

I wear different clothes in the morning than I did in the previous evening, not sure what's hard to understand about that. And I don't have urges to smoke - I do it because I enjoy it, and it suppresses my appetite. I'm in a group plan provided by my employer. They do not ask me if I smoke.

None of this is in any way remarkable. There are probably people that you know that smoke cigarettes, use heroin, cocaine, etc. etc. but you don't know because they control themselves and don't fit the stereotypical profile of someone that "uses". There are very practical things you can do to prevent yourself from becoming addicted to substances, that's what drug education should be about.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,821
29,582
146
I don't have a problem with smokers, generally. I tend to not care at all.

...however, having spent nearly 2 weeks in New York, visiting my brother who was then at Memorial for treatment for nearly 2 months, that main entrance is ridiculous. The smoke cloud really is inescapable, and this being the premiere cancer institute in the world isn't so much ironic as it is unacceptable.

Then again, Memorial does do things a bit differently...

EDIT: Oh, I see that this is not Sloan...usually, when someone says "Memorial," they tend to mean MSK. :O
 
Last edited:

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,530
3
0
you have to admit that the amount of food marketing we are subjected to does have a impact on Americas obesity issues. marketing is capitalism at its finest. just watch a football game and count how many beer or food commercials are shown. eat drink eat drink eat drink eat drink... all while sitting on your ass watching a sporting event.
Then get to the gym and do an hour or so of Cardio 3 days a week.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,530
3
0
Sorry, you lost me here. I'm not sure I understand what it is you are saying that I think that I think I'm entitled to.
You think you are entitled to tell others how to live their life, what they can and can't do in their own homes, well at least while you are on the Internet. In real life you probably aren't as much a roach like individual.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
30,993
8,709
136
You presume correctly. I am against pretty much anything which has no redeeming social value and only serves to lower and debase our society and overall standards of living and quality of life. Any system which allows you to socialize losses and concentrate gains is a broken system. Needless to say we have a lot of broken systems and health care is only one of them. Obviously you are resorting to exaggeration of my point of view by citing sports (which participating in regularly can have measurable beneficial impact on your overall health and physical fitness because they can be considered exercise) and you are veering off into the realm of the absurd because you are running out of concrete and sensible arguments (not that you had any to begin with). Hyperbole is the tool of the desperate.

Hey I look after a lot of people who have sports related injuries at the hospital, broken bones cost a lot to fix.
Using your logic we should only allow people to use exercise bikes while wearing protective clothing, no contact sports or anything outdoors.

Are you going to set up committee that decides on what we are allowed to do or are you going to make the decisions yourself?
Have you got a rough draft or are you going to wing it?
 

ahurtt

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2001
4,283
0
0
Hey I look after a lot of people who have sports related injuries at the hospital, broken bones cost a lot to fix.
Using your logic we should only allow people to use exercise bikes while wearing protective clothing, no contact sports or anything outdoors.

Are you going to set up committee that decides on what we are allowed to do or are you going to make the decisions yourself?
Have you got a rough draft or are you going to wing it?

*sigh* Honestly I don't even know why I'm bothering to waste my effort responding to this. . .No scratch that. . .I do know. It's because I do so enjoy systematically dismantling the inane and nonsensical arguments of idiots time and again. I mean, really, I shouldn't even have to explain this but here goes anyway since the plainly and utterly obvious all but seems to have eluded your grasp.

Participation in sports can result in quantifiable benefits to your health because it can be an enjoyable way of getting exercise. The possible benefits to your health and longevity from getting regular exercise, either through sports or other means, far outweigh any possible risk of injury you might receive while participating in them for the average person. The possible benefits of smoking on the other hand include. . .NONE. There is no upside to smoking to counterbalance the risk of getting the myriad health problems, one or more of which a smoker is almost certain to get, that are associated with cigarette smoking.

Which do you think costs more? Having a broken bone set or having to go through months of an agonizing chemotherapy treatment regimen? Have you ever known or had anybody in your family get cancer or die of cancer? Well I have and I'll take a broken bone or two over what they went through on any given day. If you do indeed work in a hospital then chances are you may have seen firsthand what people suffering from cancer go through. Which makes it even more astonishing that you would attempt to compare the cost of a broken bone to the cost of cancer treatment. Are you going to tell me a broken bone is more costly? Honestly. . .I mean. . .do you even think AT ALL before you hit the post reply button?
 
Last edited:

ahurtt

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2001
4,283
0
0
You think you are entitled to tell others how to live their life, what they can and can't do in their own homes, well at least while you are on the Internet. In real life you probably aren't as much a roach like individual.

I am entitled to share and debate my thoughts, life experiences, opinions, and insights with them. And likewise they are entitled to either take my words under thoughtful consideration or tell me to go stick it up my ass. But if letting other people know that what they perceive as actions that don't affect anybody but themselves do in fact affect me and others in a detrimental way means that I'm somehow entitled. . .well then so be it. I guess I'm entitled. But I'm pretty sure if somebody you didn't know were standing in another room across a hall where you couldn't see them and they couldn't see you and they were pressing a button that delivered an electrical shock to you each time they pressed it, you'd probably let them know that you really wish they'd quit pushing that damn button wouldn't you? Ok, so maybe at first they were oblivious about what the button did. Now you have enlightened them so naturally they should have no logical reason to want to continue to press the button. But what if once you told them that their pressing that button was hurting you they deliberately continued pressing it anyway, you'd probably start to get pretty pissed wouldn't you? But by the logic you seem to be using here, if you were to speak up for yourself and say "Quit it with the button, a-hole!" that would mean that you were somehow "entitled" to tell that person what to do because you were justifiably angry that the person kept pressing the button. . .? Call it entitlement if you want. I call it voicing my concerns and standing up for myself.

Bottom line. . .if what somebody does in the privacy of their own home carries over negatively to my bottom line, it ceases being a private act.
 

coloumb

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,096
0
81
what workplace allows smoking?

China.

Certain restaurants in the US still allow smoking - they have the "pardoned off open door" bar annexed to the main area for smokers/gamblers/drunktards. The seats near the door - you can definitely smell the putrid smoke.

As for workplaces? I dunno - maybe some backwoods out of the way gasoline station or quick stop?
 

ShawnD1

Lifer
May 24, 2003
15,987
2
81
Which do you think costs more? Having a broken bone set or having to go through months of an agonizing chemotherapy treatment regimen?
The guy who ran a game server with me was hit by a car while riding his bike and his medical bills were over half a million US dollars. Don't worry, he won the lawsuit to cover all expenses and he's doing great

Whoever said healthy people who exercise should pay more for insurance might be onto something. My car was hit while I wad driving about 65mph, and while my car was written off, nobody in either of the cars had any injuries. My friend on his bike was hit by a car going much slower than that and his medical expenses were more than 20x the cost of my car.
As a lazy couch potato myself, I've never had any broken bones, I've never required emergency surgery, I've never had any stitches. One of the guys in my engineering classes is on the school's hockey team and he broke his arm last year while playing hockey.
 

Bignate603

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
13,897
1
0
Exactly, I pay the same amount as the guy that sits a few cubes down from me that eats cheeseburgers. He ended up in the hospital for over a week because of arterial blockage. After that he was out 2 weeks until he had recovered enough to come back to work. He readily admits that it was most likely because of his poor diet and is trying to adjust.

If fatties actually paid the real cost it takes to insure them I wouldn't really care so much but in many cases they don't.

adjusted again....

Sure, I agree with that. Personally if you're obese I think you should either be required to be put on a weight loss program and actually show improvement or get their rates jacked up.

People should be free to make their own choices but they should be the ones that pay for it. If you're putting yourself at risk for worse health by your choices you better be willing to take full responsibility for it.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
30,993
8,709
136
*sigh* Honestly I don't even know why I'm bothering to waste my effort responding to this. . .No scratch that. . .I do know. It's because I do so enjoy systematically dismantling the inane and nonsensical arguments of idiots time and again. I mean, really, I shouldn't even have to explain this but here goes anyway since the plainly and utterly obvious all but seems to have eluded your grasp.

Participation in sports can result in quantifiable benefits to your health because it can be an enjoyable way of getting exercise. The possible benefits to your health and longevity from getting regular exercise, either through sports or other means, far outweigh any possible risk of injury you might receive while participating in them for the average person. The possible benefits of smoking on the other hand include. . .NONE. There is no upside to smoking to counterbalance the risk of getting the myriad health problems, one or more of which a smoker is almost certain to get, that are associated with cigarette smoking.

Which do you think costs more? Having a broken bone set or having to go through months of an agonizing chemotherapy treatment regimen? Have you ever known or had anybody in your family get cancer or die of cancer? Well I have and I'll take a broken bone or two over what they went through on any given day. If you do indeed work in a hospital then chances are you may have seen firsthand what people suffering from cancer go through. Which makes it even more astonishing that you would attempt to compare the cost of a broken bone to the cost of cancer treatment. Are you going to tell me a broken bone is more costly? Honestly. . .I mean. . .do you even think AT ALL before you hit the post reply button?

I have news for you.

Your going to eventually die. It wont necessarily be a better death than a chain smoking alcoholic, it might not come as soon but it wont be any easier.

Your argument was about the cost to you of others smoking the suffering thing is not going to affect you so I don't know why you brought that up.

Smokers pay a lot of tax and die earlier. I'd guess they don't actually cost society much more than any other group, if you've got any link that show otherwise I'd be interested. I'd still say it none of your business though.
 

ahurtt

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2001
4,283
0
0
I have news for you.

Your going to eventually die. It wont necessarily be a better death than a chain smoking alcoholic, it might not come as soon but it wont be any easier.

Your argument was about the cost to you of others smoking the suffering thing is not going to affect you so I don't know why you brought that up.

Smokers pay a lot of tax and die earlier. I'd guess they don't actually cost society much more than any other group, if you've got any link that show otherwise I'd be interested. I'd still say it none of your business though.

If medical costs were actually going up because everybody was living longer I wouldn't be complaining. I actually WANT people to live long healthy happy fruitful lives. If that's not what they wish for themselves then so be it. I just wish they'd find a way to kill themselves that didn't have detrimental societal consequences. I don't mind spending a little extra money when it's on something worthwhile. It just irks me to have to waste it on things that are totally pointless and preventable. I'm not saying nobody should ever get sick. Everybody is going to get sick at some point in their life. Probably many times even despite best efforts to avoid it. But doing something as silly and pointless as smoking virtually GUARANTEES you'll get illnesses you might not have otherwise and a lot more often. Sure smokers probably die earlier as a result on average, I'll give you that. But because they probably get sick much more frequently during their shortened lifespans than average healthy-weight non-smoking people, the average number of doctor visits or hospital stays is probably somewhat comparable between say a smoker who lives to 60 and a healthy non-smoker who lives to 90. But it's just such a waste and a drain on the finite number of resources that could have gone to use treating somebody who just got sick due to bad luck rather than wasted on a person who was sick because they were simply too stubborn to listen to sound advice of doctors all over the world and quit smoking. I would consider the money well spent to be the money that goes to care for generally healthy people who are living longer or to treat people who are simply unfortunate to have sickly genes and genuinely can't help it. Asking these people to help pay for the treatment of illnesses that are directly caused by the hard headed stupidity of smokers is simply absurd.

The same can be said about obesity related illness but I won't even go there for now because I've already expressed my thoughts on that issue and how I feel it is a far more complicated one than the simple choice to either smoke or not smoke.

And thanks, yea. . .I know I'm going to die one day. But I'm going to do everything in my power to make sure that when I do it will be quietly and peacefully in my sleep like my grandpa. Not screaming in horror like all the passengers in his car
 
Last edited:

MarkXIX

Platinum Member
Jan 3, 2010
2,642
1
71
Actually, an employer has EVERY right to do those things. You also have every right to refuse. Your employer has every right to refuse to hire you then.

When you actually have to hire someone you'll realize that one of the most important parts is finding out what you haven't been told. Either that or you'll hire a bunch of people who rob you blind to pay for meth or because they owe Vinnie the Weasel 18 G's.

Couldn't be more true. The employer has a choice on how to spend THEIR money by hiring you. Like it or not, an employee is just another "business investment" when it comes down to it.

Simply put, smoking is an "optional feature" on a new car. If I don't want a $2000 GPS in the dash of the new car I'm about to buy, well, I don't buy it. Same goes for hiring practices, you're just a new car to the employer.
 

ahurtt

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2001
4,283
0
0
The guy who ran a game server with me was hit by a car while riding his bike and his medical bills were over half a million US dollars. Don't worry, he won the lawsuit to cover all expenses and he's doing great

Whoever said healthy people who exercise should pay more for insurance might be onto something. My car was hit while I wad driving about 65mph, and while my car was written off, nobody in either of the cars had any injuries. My friend on his bike was hit by a car going much slower than that and his medical expenses were more than 20x the cost of my car.
As a lazy couch potato myself, I've never had any broken bones, I've never required emergency surgery, I've never had any stitches. One of the guys in my engineering classes is on the school's hockey team and he broke his arm last year while playing hockey.

Well I suppose it was only a matter of time before some dimwit made this utterly invalid outlying case type of argument. First I'm sure your friend had much more extensive injuries than just "a" broken bone. What if he hadn't been riding his bike for exercise but he was riding his bike as a means to simply get from point A to point B when he was hit? Kinda blows your whole stupid argument out of the water doesn't it? What happened to your friend was UNLUCKY. Whether or not he was riding his bike explicitly for the purpose of getting exercise is irrelevant. That kind of thing is EXACTLY what insurance is for. Insurance isn't supposed to be some security blanket that enables people to intentionally do stupid and harmful things to themselves without having to suffer the financial consequences. What happens to smokers is just stupid. Doing the equivalent of what smokers do with any other kind of insurance policy other than a health care policy would get you jailed for insurance fraud. Commit arson on your house to collect the insurance money? FRAUD! Torch your car to collect the insurance money? FRAUD! Commit suicide so your family can get your life insurance money? Well if the insurer can prove your death was intentional and self inflicted, guess what. . .your family gets jack shit! But smoke and get chronic illness? Oh, well that's ok then. . .it's your body and your choice so I guess we'll just have to have everybody else pay for it. Where the hell is the logic in that?

Furthermore, lets say you do participate in a high risk sport of some kind on a regular basis. . .maybe hang gliding or sky diving or auto racing or something like that. Know what it will cost you to get a life insurance policy compared to if you are say. . .a banker who jogs after work and maybe goes fishing or bowling on weekends? You will pay considerably more if you are the former assuming you can find somebody to cover you at all. Smoking is probably even more risky than ANY of those things. . .it just takes longer to kill you. Yet smokers should pay the same for health care coverage that everybody else does? I give that a great big WTF?!
 
Last edited:

MarkXIX

Platinum Member
Jan 3, 2010
2,642
1
71
If I were you I would focus more on productivity and competence...things that you can put in your bank.

Are you implying that the majority of smokers are more productive than non-smokers? I have to respectfully disagree based on years of experience as a supervisor and manager.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |