Is Matrox dead now?

[Hardware]

Matrox ws in another test with a (single) +
Radeon 7500 (near same price as a matrox) has a ++ !

 

[Priit]

Dunno about measurements, but my G450 looks a bit sharper at 1600x1200 than my radeon7500. Both are way above any Nvidia's card I have seen

 

[Hardware]

Cards in europe are different because of hf filters

 

[Czar]

<< Cards in europe are different because of hf filters >>


No their not, same thing for us and europe.
And this test is in no way valid for comparing Matrox 2d quality to others because matrox isnt even in this test.

 

[Dreadogg]

Well I guess all these replys answere your question! THE MATROX DOES EXIST!

 

[Eug]

<< ati and matrox card together, put them in 1600x1200 and see the difference, its obvios. >>

I wouldn't say that's necessarily true. The latest ATI cards are very nice. I prefer the flexibility of Matrox's drivers though. More usable settings than ATI (although my ATI drivers are ultra stable even if they aren't as flexible). Can't say the same about nVidia though - too much variability in image quality, since they don't make their own cards.