- Jun 22, 2001
- 27,929
- 142
- 106
Uh no, James still shot shitty last night (9-24) and will never be anywhere near Curry's shooting career shooting percentages. A healthy Steph is still going to continue ravaging the league when healthy. It was obvious when Steph was having trouble finishing in the Finals that he's not 100%. Steph led the league in finishing in the paint and how many floaters did you see him make in the entire Finals, 1? That is his bread and butter and he used it once, maybe twice due to the fact that he couldn't drive like he normally does. Not to mention that his cutting ability to create shots and execute the PnR weren't there either. Not to mention that he couldn't hit a tunnel shot during the Finals which hadn't happened for 82 games.After his performance in these finals and a down 3-1 never done before come back I could see it being a valid argument. I put him above Kobe after tonight. He has a ways to go to pass Jordan, but it's doable if he has 2 or 3 more seasons like this one. And at worst he'll in the top 3 all time, and imho anyone who argues that isn't worth wasting my time discussing basketball with. And even though the Warriors aren't the best team ever like their crazy fans have been saying. They have an elite team and James took them down, which is a feat.
I suspect sp33Demon won't post again in this thread. I'll add this and be gone myself
James > Curry.
So laugh it up, but Curry still crushed Lebron in the regular season when he was healthy and at full skill level and larger sample size. PER doesn't lie, and GS ain't going away anytime soon if Steph is healthy. If he's not healthy, then he would be the greatest shooter ever flash in the pan 2 time MVP.