Yeh, we don't need any enforcement of civil rights statutes. Businesses should be able to discriminate on the basis of race, just like the good old days.
Its a matter of what his ideology is in line with and what he could actually do as President. Sort of like Obama and single payer system, closing Gitmo, huge redistribution of wealth, etc.
Kind of falls back on the Ron Paul sludge that was thrown around. Speaking on what he could and couldn't do as President. Ron Paul WINS!!! Fed is abolished day 1, all troops are within CONUS in less than 24hrs, all drugs are now legal day 1, gold standard is the new norm day 1, etc.
Absolutely none of that could happen, what he could do is veto asinine bills and force Congress to read them, start winding down our ridiculous foreign policy, be open to individual liberty agendas (gays marriage, no conservative social legislation, etc.), establish a sane dialog for immigration, etc.
You might not like it, but a conservative that has some libertarian leanings would have quite a few opinions that liberals can actually agree with. It's those things they can do that matter, not the gold standard extremes that could never happen. Conservatives would like their individual liberty issues as well and small government fiscal stances. Liberals would probably favor a libertarians foreign policy much more so than a true conservative in the traditional sense.
No one politician can make everyone happy, but as of late they have all been either admired or hated entirely by whichever party shares or opposes their view. I'd like to see that change and if we got a Democrat that offered something similar which is possible with blue dogs I'd take a serious look at them.