Is this believable story by Donna Brazile?

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,812
49,499
136

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
So when should I expect her to be charged otherwise it's just more BS you are peddling

You set the line, either
Hillary is guilty but your leadership is incapable of getting her charged

Or

It's just a bullshit claim that no prosecutor will take up.

It's one or the other.
Oh yeah, how's that Dick Cheney trial going for you Democrats?
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
WUT? You made the claim against Hillary, I reminded you that R's (your team) control virtually every aspect of Government at the moment. I am waiting for charges to be made and a trial to be had.
Well i'll e-mail my congressman and 2 Senators, we'll see what happens. I'll ask them to hurry up.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
WUT? You made the claim against Hillary, I reminded you that R's (your team) control virtually every aspect of Government at the moment. I am waiting for charges to be made and a trial to be had.

He's gotta try to duh-vert, somehow. Conservatives are led on very easily. They're always gonna get that Eevil Hillary... this time for sure! Just like the last time & the times before that. It's their eternal snipe hunt.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,812
49,499
136
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...dab5a0ab381_story.html?utm_term=.c4b9b8188abd

Brazile writes that she was haunted by the still-unsolved murder of DNC data staffer Seth Rich and feared for her own life, shutting the blinds to her office window so snipers could not see her and installing surveillance cameras at her home. She wonders whether Russians had placed a listening device in plants in the DNC executive suite.

Hmmm

Considering the fact that her other claims so far have shown to be obvious bullshit intended to make headlines it’s hard to take anything she says seriously.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
Considering the fact that her other claims so far have shown to be obvious bullshit intended to make headlines it’s hard to take anything she says seriously.
What would cause a loyal foot soldier like Brazile to turn on the Clinton machine. More so than the nomination and financial shenanigans, I found the Biden/Booker revelation more interesting.

So she thought the Clinton campaign was anemic after the fainting incident, but contemplated excluding Sanders from any replacement ticket? That solution literally manages to anger just about everyone.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,812
49,499
136
What would cause a loyal foot soldier like Brazile to turn on the Clinton machine. More so than the nomination and financial shenanigans, I found the Biden/Booker revelation more interesting.

So she thought the Clinton campaign was anemic after the fainting incident, but contemplated excluding Sanders from any replacement ticket? That solution literally manages to anger just about everyone.

But again we already know she’s lying about that because she didn’t have the power to do what she is claiming she considered.

I mean if she was making the part up about changing the nominee why would you think she wasn’t making up the part about who it would be changed to?
 

UglyCasanova

Lifer
Mar 25, 2001
19,275
1,361
126
She can consider doing it even if she lacks the power (I have no idea if she has the power too ), that doesn’t necessarily make her a liar. She’s politician so no doubt she is one though.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
But again we already know she’s lying about that because she didn’t have the power to do what she is claiming she considered.

I mean if she was making the part up about changing the nominee why would you think she wasn’t making up the part about who it would be changed to?
Well DWS apparently had the power to coronate the initial nominee, so maybe Brazile thought she had the power to annoint her replacement?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,812
49,499
136
She can consider doing it even if she lacks the power (I have no idea if she has the power too ), that doesn’t necessarily make her a liar. She’s politician so no doubt she is one though.

Oh come on. She was clearly saying she had the power to do so and she very obviously does not. If you think she does I would love to see the bylaw that says the DNC chair can remove the nominee.

So far we know she lied about Clinton ‘rigging’ the primary as the agreement was for the general election only and we know she lied about the ability to remove the nominee. Why would it be logical to think her supposed choice of replacement would be any more accurate?

I don’t know what it is about Hillary Clinton that makes people throw logic out the window and just believe anything they hear.
 

UglyCasanova

Lifer
Mar 25, 2001
19,275
1,361
126
I have no idea if she has the power and I doubt you do either. The technical power I mean. Legally within the framework of the dnc could she. Not will of the people which I highly doubt would let her.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,812
49,499
136
Well DWS apparently had the power to coronate the initial nominee, so maybe Brazile thought she had the power to annoint her replacement?

Haha, DWS didn’t do shit to make Clinton win. At absolute most you could say favorable debate schedules but if you really think that shifted millions of votes I don’t know what to tell you. Clinton vs. Obama was a fairly close primary. Clinton vs. Sanders was not.

Regardless if the argument is that Brazile didn’t know the powers of her office... okay? You would think she would have checked before writing a book about it at least.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
He's gotta try to duh-vert, somehow. Conservatives are led on very easily. They're always gonna get that Eevil Hillary... this time for sure! Just like the last time & the times before that. It's their eternal snipe hunt.
Seeing the apologists for the corrupt Democratic party and a crook like Hillary out in force in this forum is reward enough. I just love watching you and fskihole tap dance while claiming that Hillary isn't really crooked and what the DNC did was perfectly reasonable, and there's nothing to see here, move along....fast.
 

UglyCasanova

Lifer
Mar 25, 2001
19,275
1,361
126
You’ll run defense for them no matter. You have no idea if what we know is the tip of the iceberg, but can’t deny some shady shit was afoot within the DNC. The best you can hope is just call them a liar and move along no matter what actually may be lurking beneath. Where there’s smoke there’s generally fire and right now there’s a hell of a lot of smoke.
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,812
49,499
136
I have no idea if she has the power and I doubt you do either. The technical power I mean. Legally within the framework of the dnc could she. Not will of the people which I highly doubt would let her.

I do in fact know she lacked the technical power to do so. Legally within the framework of the DNC she could not. It is a totally made up thing.

The DNC chairman is in charge of filling VACANCIES in the case of nominees, meaning the nominee needs to step down or die or be otherwise rendered incapable. None of that happened here. Even that has to happen with the agreement of the full committee.

If you think there is a process outlined in the bylaws where Brazile could have taken that action please quote it from the bylaws here:

https://www.demrulz.org/wp-content/files/DNC_Charter__Bylaws_9.11.2009.pdf
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
82,854
17,365
136
I dont know why we keep arguing about this. Debbie admitted what she did a LONG time ago. There was a lawsuit. It was dismissed a couple months ago.

http://observer.com/2017/08/court-a...rman-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders/

Am I the only person here who's actually been watching the news? Or am I the only person who can remember more than a week of it?

http://jampac.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/62-D.E.-62-Ord-of-Dismissal-8-25-17.pdf
(lawsuit)


Oh, but NEXT time it will be fair and balanced! HONEST!

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...on-process-in-2020-after-uproar-idUSKBN1D500C

Fuckers.
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,812
49,499
136
You’ll run defense for them no matter. You have no idea if what we know is the tip of the iceberg, but can’t deny some shady shit was afoot within the DNC. The best you can hope is just call them a liar and move along no matter what actually may be lurking beneath.

The major things she has said so far are verifiably false. If you dispute they are false then please provide contrary information. It’s bizarre to say someone is running defense when they are simply pointing out facts.

Where there’s smoke there’s generally fire and right now there’s a hell of a lot of smoke.

I’m really not sure why you have this giant blind spot when it comes to Hillary Clinton where you will believe anything. Total Clinton Derangement Syndrome.

I mean in the Russia uranium thread you stubbornly clung to a conspiracy theory that you couldn’t even explain. It’s not logical or rational. Now you’re credulously repeating verifiably false statements from people. Something tells me if Brazile had come out and said Clinton was great you would have immediately dismissed her, which shows that you believe things based on your preferred conclusion. Frankly I’m baffled as to why you hate her so much anyway. She was a pretty standard politician.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,812
49,499
136
I dont know why we keep arguing about this. Debbie admitted what she did a LONG time ago. There was a lawsuit. It was dismissed a couple months ago.

http://observer.com/2017/08/court-a...rman-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders/

Am I the only person here who's actually been watching the news? Or am I the only person who can remember more than a week of it?

http://jampac.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/62-D.E.-62-Ord-of-Dismissal-8-25-17.pdf
(lawsuit)


Oh, but NEXT time it will be fair and balanced! HONEST!

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...on-process-in-2020-after-uproar-idUSKBN1D500C

Fuckers.

I keep asking this but nobody seems able to answer. What ‘rigging’ took place? As far as I can see we’ve got favorably scheduled debates.

Other than that I’m at a loss. Since whatever happened must have been so unfair as to cost Sanders millions of votes it’s got to be pretty big, right? So... what was it?
 

Thebobo

Lifer
Jun 19, 2006
18,592
7,673
136
So, the Clinton disaster continues to smolder. She will go down as the worst candidate to run for president.

I didn't realize there was a "go down" for worst candidate to run for president. And if there were th there are a lot worse. Trump will go down as the worse president eva! And the "go down" system for president will be terminated because it will be impossible to achieve his level of ineptitude, forever.
 
Last edited:
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |