Is this believable story by Donna Brazile?

Page 10 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
IT would definitely work that way in your homeland of Russia, but that is why it is a good thing you aren't American or that this country isn't anything like you. We actually have laws, and it is required for crimes to both be committed and prosecuted before you can send someone to prison. But you wouldn't know anything about that, you little Russian shit.

I don't think so. My money is on American 'useful idiot'.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
IT would definitely work that way in your homeland of Russia, but that is why it is a good thing you aren't American or that this country isn't anything like you. We actually have laws, and it is required for crimes to both be committed and prosecuted before you can send someone to prison. But you wouldn't know anything about that, you little Russian shit.
She broke the law when she illegally stored classified documents on a private server and when she ordered documents destroyed after they'd been subpoenaed. Anyone else but a privileged member of the political elite would be doing time.
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie
Feb 4, 2009
34,703
15,951
136
She broke the law when she illegally stored classified documents on a private server and when she ordered documents destroyed after they'd been subpoenaed. Anyone else but a privileged member of the political elite would be doing time.

Good then charge her and lock her up. I am still waiting...
As I said earlier your party is in control of everything so its either:

The your leadership is incapable of getting it done
or
All this talk over the years is utter bullshit.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
Good then charge her and lock her up. I am still waiting...
As I said earlier your party is in control of everything so its either:

The your leadership is incapable of getting it done
or
All this talk over the years is utter bullshit.

Years? Most of the information is barely a year old.
As I said, if it was up to me she'd be wearing a stylish new orange jumpsuit, it isn't up to me, but there's still time before the statue of limitations is up.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
So do you think it is impossible for the strongest player in Dem politics not to stack the deck in her favor?

I'm shocked that Brazile & Warren have come out against Clinton. Clinton's star has really fallen. People don't speak out against Clintons... they are delt with.

Thats the thing with Lefties they all stick together... that's why they still run DC. Repubes are wussies.

Right back around to the underlying innuendo, that she stacked the deck in some mysterious fashion you can't describe.

The truth is that Clinton stepped up to finance the DNC in a way designed to support any eventual nominee no matter who they were. That's good for the Party & for all Democrats. The DNC reached out to all the contenders before the primaries & she was the only one who did what was right for the party. Go figure.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,324
15,123
136
She broke the law when she illegally stored classified documents on a private server and when she ordered documents destroyed after they'd been subpoenaed. Anyone else but a privileged member of the political elite would be doing time.

You are lying again.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
Good then charge her and lock her up. I am still waiting...
As I said earlier your party is in control of everything so its either:

The your leadership is incapable of getting it done
or
All this talk over the years is utter bullshit.
You are lying again.
Nope, both those statements are accurate. Are you saying she didn't store classified documents on her personal server?
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
You know it's bad for the taj troll when he has to duhvert to buttery males....
 
Feb 4, 2009
34,703
15,951
136
Nope, both those statements are accurate. Are you saying she didn't store classified documents on her personal server?

No I am agreeing with you. Charge her and lock her up. I've been hearing this for years and you guys won't do anything.

Again its either:
Your leadership is incapable of getting it done...again....
or
The charge is complete and utter bullshit.

Its one or the other. I await her trial.
 
Last edited:

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
Right back around to the underlying innuendo, that she stacked the deck in some mysterious fashion you can't describe.

The truth is that Clinton stepped up to finance the DNC in a way designed to support any eventual nominee no matter who they were. That's good for the Party & for all Democrats. The DNC reached out to all the contenders before the primaries & she was the only one who did what was right for the party. Go figure.

What's More Likely HRC a benevolent figure or a self serving savvy politician moving pawns around to get what she wants?

C'mon Man!
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
What's More Likely HRC a benevolent figure or a self serving savvy politician moving pawns around to get what she wants?

C'mon Man!
You've got to understand, jhhnn and ivwshane consider Hillary to be a cross between the Madonna and Joan of Arc, except without the religion thing.
 

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
No I am agreeing with you. Charge her and lock her up. I've been hearing this for years and you guys won't do anything.

Again its either:
Your leadership is incapable of getting it done
or
The charge is complete and utter bullshit.

Its one or the other. I await her trial.


Actually Comey laid out why she could be prosecuted. And then Didn't turn it over to the DOJ. And said in the next breath why if anyone does this in the future they will be Prosecuted!
Comey and the FBI IS the Federal Bureau of Investigation not the Federal Bureau of PROSECUTION. Investigate then turn over to the DOJ. It is not his job to decide whether or not to prosecute.

But I will admit the Republicans are wussies and seem inept in taking down political enemies and rather fight each other. The charge is not BS. There did not need to be intent.
 
Reactions: DarthKyrie

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
You've got to understand, jhhnn and ivwshane consider Hillary to be a cross between the Madonna and Joan of Arc, except without the religion thing.


Oh some things don't change. And I realize there is no changing his mind but my statement was purely to make it plain as day what kind of person she might be. She's always been about Her much as most politicians. I mean she was a Senator of a state she didn't live in? The Clintons have No modern day political equals.

Honestly If I was her and saw a Communist non Democrat try and Hijack her ticket that she deserves (sarcasm) I'd stack the deck too. People lose sight that he wasn't even a Dem until what a couple months before announcing?
 
Feb 4, 2009
34,703
15,951
136
Actually Comey laid out why she could be prosecuted. And then Didn't turn it over to the DOJ. And said in the next breath why if anyone does this in the future they will be Prosecuted!
Comey and the FBI IS the Federal Bureau of Investigation not the Federal Bureau of PROSECUTION. Investigate then turn over to the DOJ. It is not his job to decide whether or not to prosecute.

But I will admit the Republicans are wussies and seem inept in taking down political enemies and rather fight each other. The charge is not BS. There did not need to be intent.

Good then charge her. I'm waiting and I suspect I'll continue to wait. Maybe I'll see it when I get my beautiful healthcare that is:
Cheaper monthly cost
Lower deductibles
Shorter wait times
Lower prescription costs
With everyone covered
 
Reactions: shortylickens

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,324
15,123
136
Nope, both those statements are accurate. Are you saying she didn't store classified documents on her personal server?

I highlighted the part I disagreed with, is this too difficult for you to follow along?

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/09/the-fbi-files-on-clintons-emails/

It turned out that Keilar’s assumption was accurate. The 31,830 personal emails that Keilar asked about were deleted “sometime between March 25-31, 2015,” according to the FBI. That was about three weeks after Clinton received a House subpoena on March 4, 2015.

As the FBI explains, Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s former chief of staff, and David Kendall, Clinton’s lawyer, oversaw the process of sorting the work-related emails from the personal emails. Heather Samuelson, a lawyer who worked on Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, undertook the review to identify work-related emails and reported to Mills and Kendall.

In December 2014, after the work-related emails were preserved, Mills told Platte River Networks – which at the time was managing Clinton’s private server – that Clinton “decided she no longer needed access to any of her e-mails older than 60 days.” Mills instructed the PRN employee — who was not identified — “to modify the e-mail retention policy” on Clinton’s server “to reflect this change,” the FBI said.

But the PRN employee mistakenly did not make the retention-policy change and did not delete the old emails until sometime between March 25 and March 31, even though Mills had sent PRN an email on March 9 that mentioned the committee’s request to preserve emails.

The PRN employee who deleted the emails was a recipient of Mills’ message. However, the employee told the FBI that “he had an ‘oh shit’ moment and sometime between March 25-31, 2015 deleted the Clinton archive mailbox from the PRN server and used BleachBit to delete the exported .PST files he had created on the server containing Clinton’s e-mails.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...6883aacba64_story.html?utm_term=.26a5c3c416d3

4. Any mishandling of classified information is illegal.

Some 2016 presidential candidates have not hesitated to label the mishandling of classified information as criminal, with former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee calling Clinton’s actions “beyond outrageously illegal.” Even a New York Times article stated flatly, “Mishandling classified information is a crime.”

In fact, in a nod to the complexities of handling classified information, the law criminalizes only violations that are “knowing,” “negligent” or the like. The law falls short, however, in failing to give express protection to knowing releases of classified information by whistleblowers. The Obama administration has used the Espionage Act — a statute meant to target spies and traitors — to prosecute federal employees who revealed waste, fraud and abuse. Judges allowed these cases to go forward even though none of the defendants harmed or intended to harm national security.


Who knew taj was a liar?

We all knew.
 

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
Good then charge her. I'm waiting and I suspect I'll continue to wait. Maybe I'll see it when I get my beautiful healthcare that is:
Cheaper monthly cost
Lower deductibles
Shorter wait times
Lower prescription costs
With everyone covered

I don't think you read what I said or you wouldn't say charge her. But thanks for not reading.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
What's More Likely HRC a benevolent figure or a self serving savvy politician moving pawns around to get what she wants?

C'mon Man!

Repeating something you can't prove doesn't make it more true. List the overt acts of the DNC that disadvantaged Bernie.

Or just concern troll on by.
 

EXman

Lifer
Jul 12, 2001
20,079
15
81
Repeating something you can't prove doesn't make it more true. List the overt acts of the DNC that disadvantaged Bernie.

Or just concern troll on by.


Why even post that mumbo jumbo? There is no repeating anything it was a very simple question.

No use arguing with a Partisan before an American.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,775
49,434
136
lol, "Clintonfactcheck" and "ClintonWashingtonPost" both kinda clear Hillary on her felonies.

lol of course. when confronted with contrary information you simply decide the source is biased, never that you once again were duped by conservative media.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |