Originally posted by: sonz70
He deserved it, go look at fatalities caused by reckless driving ect. I have no sympahy for these people.
I call BS.
The two largest killers on the road are lane deviation and differences in speed. Note that "difference in speed" is not the same as "exceeding posted limits".
We all see differences in speed all the time...
[*]Somebody who is performing excessive lane changes to bypass slower traffic, passing on either the left or right.
[*]Somebody who is driving in a lane at a much higher rate of speed than the lane next to them. Carpool lanes on the left are notorious for this.
[*]Somebody who is driving slowly who pulls in front of a vehicle driving at a higher rate of speed when said faster driver is going with the flow of traffic
I could be the speeder doing any of these three acts above without ever breaking the speed limit.
If the posted speed is 55 and the flow of traffic is doing 70, then you shouldn't be going over 70. That said, if you're doing 75, it should not be considered an automatic reckless act. The average speed of traffic for that given time should also be factored in.
The problem is that the state of VA automatically states that going 20-MPH over the speed limit is reckless. It doesn't mean that he was reckless in reality, it just means that according to the law he was reckless.
Given that this judge is fully aware that this stretch of road often sees rates of traffic above the speed limit, she should have considered that. Given that she did not shows that either she is a very black-n-white style of judge (not always bad) or that she is trying to send a message (usually bad).
Either this judge needs to be voted out or the laws in VA need to be altered to use a percentage over the speed limit rather than an absolute speed.