/eyerollNot sure the issue here. Ive never said there wont be any indictments or arrests...just any day now. Not sure what you guys are all on me about.
People who think Trump being indicted is going to help his electoral prospects are doing some 9 dimensional chess nonsense. It could THEORETICALLY help him in the Republican primary, although even that I doubt. It will hurt him in the general election, because duh.“Only Trump could be helped by an indictment. I don’t mean to be funny, but [for] any other person, an indictment is not a way to win an election.” - Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska)
People who think Trump being indicted is going to help his electoral prospects are doing some 9 dimensional chess nonsense. It could THEORETICALLY help him in the Republican primary, although even that I doubt. It will hurt him in the general election, because duh.
I'm not at all confident of that, but the primary is a year away so we'll see!R primary voters already look to be increasingly tilting his way and his impending indictment isn't exactly a secret so yeah I think he probably wins the primary. Poison for the general election electorate through.
/shrug Never did. Just mocked how its been right around the corner for a long time./eyeroll
Glad to see you're picking up the 'who, me?' game though - we really missed that one.
You did notice the part where basically none of your links said that, right?/shrug Never did. Just mocked how its been right around thew corner for a long time.
mmkay shall I bold it for you?You did notice the part where basically none of your links said that, right?
You totally owned yourself with that post, lol.
I dont remember anyone saying right now. I have read dozens of time its "imminent."
Trump Could Be Indicted As Early As Next Week, Report Says
Mar 17, 2023
Trump Could Be Indicted As Early As Next Week, Report Says
Law enforcement officials are preparing for enhanced security protocols at Manhattan Criminal Court in the event Trump becomes the first former president to be criminally indicted.www.forbes.com
Donald Trump claimed on Saturday that his arrest is imminent and issued an extraordinary call for his supporters to protest as a New York grand jury
Mar 18, 2023
Trump says he expects to be arrested in hush-money case, stokes unrest on social media
Donald Trump claimed on Saturday that his arrest is imminent and issued an extraordinary call for his supporters to protest as a New York grand jury investigates hush money payments to women who alleged sexual encounters with the former president.www.pbs.org
She also said a decision on an indictment is “imminent.”
January 26
All Outward Signs Point to a Prosecution of Trump and his Cohorts - Insider NJ
During the past weeks, I have heard disappointment with and criticism of the Biden Administration by citizens and pundits because of a concern that Joe Biden’s possession of classified documents undermines a powerful case against Donald Trump for the classified documents he maintained in...www.insidernj.com
As Indictment Draws Near, Trump Erupts on Social Media
January 30
As Indictment Draws Near, Trump Erupts on Social Media
The walls appear to be closing in on former President Donald Trump, as a Georgia prosecutor appears on the verge of indicting the bombastic Republican.www.washingtoninformer.com
Nothing in the contents of this article says Trump will be indicted in the near future. It's a Q&A about the role of prosecutors in US life.As charges loom over Trump, prosecutors come under fire – a criminal justice expert explains what’s at stake
As charges loom over Trump, prosecutors come under fire – a criminal justice expert explains what’s at stake
Most prosecutors are elected in uncontested races across the country. But there are signs that the posts are becoming political hotbeds, placing more pressure on the criminal justice system.theconversation.com
Once again from last week, making nearly half of your links describing the same event from one week ago.Sununu Says Impending Trump Indictment ‘Drastically’ Changes ‘Paradigm’ for 2024
March 19, 2023
Sununu Says Impending Trump Indictment ‘Drastically’ Changes ‘Paradigm’ for 2024 | National Review
The New Hampshire governor said the indictment could backfire on Democrats and upset the 2024 political stage.www.nationalreview.com
Nothing in the contents of this article says Trump will be indicted in the near future. The time frame it gives is 'the year 2023 sometime'. EDIT: In fact others say it wouldn't be until 2024, so unless by 'any day now' you meant 'sometime in the next ~730 days' this doesn't say what you want either.'Inevitable that Trump will be indicted': Legal Twitter sounds off on special counsel
November 18
‘Inevitable that Trump will be indicted’: Legal Twitter sounds off on special counsel - Washington Examiner
Legal trouble is looming over former President Donald Trump following the explosive appointment of a special counsel to weigh criminal charges against him Friday, according to a slew of legal experts. Experts think the 2024 contender is in trouble after Attorney General Merrick Garland announced...www.washingtonexaminer.com
'Decisions are imminent' on charges in Trump's effort to overturn 2020 election in Georgia
Jan 24, 2023
What you have shown here is you just googled something and posted links, not having actually read a single one of the articles, haha. The only ones that actually said what you're complaining about came from LAST WEEK.So yeah. Any day now.
Don't worry, just did the work for you, lol.mmkay shall I bold it for you?
/shrug Never did. Just mocked how its been right around the corner for a long time.
Absolutely. Never thought otherwise. In other words, Trump lied again lol.You realize that this whole "arrested on Tuesday" thing came from Trump right?
Out of his seven examples of the supposedly 'any day now' indictment are:You realize that this whole "arrested on Tuesday" thing came from Trump right?
Yeah the words immanent are common.For the record:
So these do say his indictment is going to happen any day, but they are literally from last week describing this week. lol.
So nothing here that says the indictment of Trump is imminent, just that a decision is.
Nothing in the contents of the article says Trump will be indicted and specifically says the special grand jury didn't even have that power.
Nothing in the contents of this article says Trump will be indicted in the near future. It's a Q&A about the role of prosecutors in US life.
Once again from last week, making nearly half of your links describing the same event from one week ago.
Nothing in the contents of this article says Trump will be indicted in the near future. The time frame it gives is 'the year 2023 sometime'. EDIT: In fact others say it wouldn't be until 2024, so unless by 'any day now' you meant 'sometime in the next ~730 days' this doesn't say what you want either.
Once again, nothing in the contents of this article says Trump will be indicted in the near future, only that a decision will be made.
What you have shown here is you just googled something and posted links, not having actually read a single one of the articles, haha. The only ones that actually said what you're complaining about came from LAST WEEK.
So yeah, total self ownage. Why not bother to read the articles you post?
Either way, any day now!Out of his seven examples of the supposedly 'any day now' indictment are:
Three talking about the same event last week
Two talking about how Georgia prosecutors would make some sort of decision in the near future, not that Trump would be indicted
One Q&A with a prosecutor that doesn't even mention Trump's indictment
One collection of Twitter posts where they say an indictment is 1-2 years away
'any day now!'
lol.
'And by any day now I mean sometime in the next several years!'Either way, any day now!
'any day now!'
lol.
Number 4 sounds like he needs to go back to reeducation camp. /sTrump appears to remain unarrested. Some of his supporters are advocating some sort of "bank run" as a protest should he become so. I’m not convinced the sort of Trump supporters that would do this have enough money to affect any bank, but they’re welcome to give it a go.
Trump supporters ‘plan run on banks’ to protest his arrest
Former president’s supporters are thinking of a ‘nonviolent form of social disobedience’www.independent.co.uk
There is widespread scuttlebutt in the MAGA-verse that they’re warning each other not to protest at all because:
1. It’s a trap set by the Deep State! Despite the fact that the only one calling for protests is Trump himself.
2. It will be infiltrated by communist democrats who will act out to try and make them look bad.
3. His instructions weren’t clear enough. Protest when and where?
4. He didn’t support J6 “patriots” who protested for him last time. “Don’t expose your back, because Trump does not have yours,” one user on a pro-Trump social media group wrote. “And he never will.”
Lots of excuses and rationalizations for not getting out there and putting themselves in the spotlight for this loser. It only took them six years to figure that out. I suspect they'll still vote for him over ANY Democrat though.
I agree he should have been in prison decades ago but we are where we are. It doesn't change the fact that he's going to be charged 'any day now' was not a thing until just last week.We know that time passes differently for people who are being burned by a hot stove and those not so afflicted. So may I suggest that if you are emotionally unsympathetic to liberal glee at the prospect of an orange jumpsuit clad Trump, the subjective experience of the time involved in the notion of his eminent indictment may pass far more slowly for them than for others. For me personally it has been centuries since he should have been in prison.
I think you have been right on this from the beginning and also consistent in what you have expressed. I have felt you were right in your opinion but probably because I have agreed. Everything about our legal system demands that he be indicted in my opinion. My only frustration is with how long it has taken and what a pass by the legal system on his obvious criminal acts would imply negatively for the future of US. He just has to be indicted and tried to end the agony of millions and millions of people who know with absolute certainty he is guilty. This makes the necessity of an indictment an imperative. It has to be or we're fucked.I agree he should have been in prison decades ago but we are where we are. It doesn't change the fact that he's going to be charged 'any day now' was not a thing until just last week.
The only other analogous situation I can think of is that people did genuinely think that Mueller would say if Trump committed crimes or not instead of just very strongly implying he did and ducking his responsibility. Even then though it's not like if Mueller had said 'Trump committed crimes X, Y, and Z' that would have caused Trump to be indicted as while he was president that was never going to happen.
My position has always been that he will be indicted. I also took a guess last year that it might happen by the new year but clearly that didn't happen so I was wrong there. That being said it does not in any way change my core prediction, the only question is when and how many times.
Im beginning to wonder about all of this. After all, it was the media who latched onto this and ran with it just like they have with every other prediction of impending Trump doom. I remember back pre-Muller report where the media (except for Fox) were saying THIS IS IT. THIS WILL BE THE END OF TRUMP. It was the media who stared up those assumptions and looks like the same is happening now. No one that matters has said Trump is about to be indicted, only the media has been saying this and running with this with their ongoing "indictment watch".
Even Trump himself was lured into the hype believing that he was about to be indicted, yet no one has actually being indicted.
Is this just more media hysteria? I mean, the media could make a bundle of airing video of a Trump arrest, so they jump to conclusions hoping that was about to happen. I think the media should best use their time getting people prepared should nothing happen at all. That seems to be where we are headed with this, not an indictment but yet another episode where Trump gets away scot-free.
Chalk it up to the list of oh-well, close but no cigar.
Russian election inference: scot-free.
Muller investigation: scot-free.
Grabbing pussy interview: scot-free.
Phone calls to Ukraine: scot-free.
Impeachment #1: scot-free.
January 6th: scot-free.
Impeachment #2: scot-free.
Classified documents: scot-free
etc etc etc
And now Stormy Daniels : scot-free once again.
Next, Georgia: also scot-free.
And last but not least, say hello America to your next president.
the thread title couldn't be more accurateMaybe it's politically motivated and not based on facts. How many times do we need to see faked or manipulated evidence by Democrats before people start accepting reality?