Originally posted by: Cogman
I Had a water cooling system before, however I ended up giving it up for air cooling. Here is what.
1. The reason I switched back to air cooling is simply because my brother killed my computer by not plugging in the pump. (Grr, that was a bit irritating, he said "Yah, the cpu keeps overheating and I don't know why, this was while I was away). So, you have to worry about pump failure or stupid people with a water cooling system.
2. Just switching the motherboard and cpu out of the case was a Nightmare, something that I found out when I installed the system was there are no standard screws for a water cooling system, so really I would Highly recommend getting a case that was built for water cooling (if you want it that badly.)
3. Currently, air cooling had caught up with water cooling in a big way, Yes, it is not as good as water cooling, but it is a lot better then it was 3 years ago (when I built my water cooling system) If you want to get even better then water cooling temps on air, you could easily invest in a pelter, cold plate and a high end HS for probably around $100-$150 (might be more as I believe you need a second power supply) I spent around $300 for my water cooling system, the Heatsinks alone are around $50, for a good one.
4. The "Water cooling is much quieter" argument is true, but not THAT true. Don't get me wrong, my computer was dead quiet with water cooling, but switching back to air, it is about the same noise, maybe a little louder.
5. Even the most complicated air systems are much easier to use then a water cooling system. With a water cooling system you can just install and forget, You have to leak check, monitor water levels, make sure you have your flow going in the right order (Do you want the water to go through the radiator, then the storage then the cpu? What about a gpu, just after the CPU. Is you radiator powerful enough to handle a good gpu?)
6. Did I mention Ease of use? Yah, targon tubing is a pain to deal with, most of the time I had my case open, just because I did not want to cut and waist tubes (yeah that was a bit stupid on my part).
Now, if none of those things really bother you then go for it, for me, however, Air cooling is definitely good enough.
Watercooling has evolved in 3 yrs. Trust me, its not the same. Pumps are now DC, so you dont have to plug it in a AC. even then theres relays.
Air in noway can catch up to water. And air cooling a petiler <--- i love when people say this, it shows how little they know about TEC. If you dont believe me that tec air products sucks, the moonson vigor, or any air cooled tec product would have to struggle and be extremely loud to get near my watercool temps.
Noise vs air on water is significantly less. Assuming you have the same cooling capacity on both products, it would take far less undervolting of a fan on the radiator to cool the same as a simular air setup. In other words, Air cooling at MAX = low/mid fan on water. So please dont compare the two on noise without comparing performance as well.
OMG how is setting up a watercooling rig difficult? Because everyone thinks is so dayam hard, i think i'll write a basic guide on how to setup a water. Im due for a remodel on my loop since i sold my QX. I hope when i do write the guide, it becomes a sticky.
Targon tubing??? ROFL.... u must be one rich mofo to afford tubing at 2.99 / feet.
Masterkleer at 7/16ID is much easier to work with in turns. Also costs .49 / feet at petra vs 2.99 / feet for tygon.
I JUST WANT TO ADD THIS BECAUSE IM TIRED OF PEOPLE SAYING AIR COOLING A TEC OWNS. NO IT DOESNT if you say this, YOUR A STRAIGHT UP NOOB. I dont care how much you know about TEC. If you think its possible to cool a hotside on AIR for a TEC at the required voltage ~227Watt TEC plate is required if your applying directly to CPU. It Just not POSSIBLE to cool on AIR. a 226W TEC will STRESS and i SAY STRESS a 120x3 Radiator if you dont have adaquate flow. SO ANYONE THAT READS THIS PLEASE KEEP THIS IN MIND, AIR COOLED TEC's ARE STRAIGHT UP POINTLESS!.
NOTES ON TEC. *direct copy from xtremesystems on TEC setups* READ IT LEARN IT AND DONT NOOB STATE ABOUT TEC's Im seriously TIRED of people passing FAKE statements saying AIRCOOLED TEC's are the best.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are a few examples with difference watt TECs cooling a modern processor which usually generate around 60+ watts of heat. Practice the formula on at least one of these examples before calculating Delta T for your own project!
*) A 40watt TEC cooling a modern processor generating 60-watts of heat.
Delta T = -34C (negative 34C). Thatâ??s an INCREASE in temperature on the cold side, so the processor would have been warmer than before! Using an under powered TEC can destroy the processor. Cooking your CPU with your TEC is NOT a good thing, avoid this common mistake.
*) A 60-watt TEC cooling a modern processor generating 60-watts of heat.
Delta T = 0 (no change in temp). Congratulations, youâ??ve accomplished nothing!
*) A 176-watt TEC cooling a modern processor generating 60-watts of heat.
Delta T = 46C. Thatâ??s a decrease in temperature on the cold side, making the cold-side 46C cooler than the hot-side. Not bad.
*) A 226-watt TEC cooling a modern processor generating 60-watts of heat.
Delta T = 51C. Thatâ??s a decrease in temperature on the cold-side, making the cold-side 50C colder than the warm-side. Even better, but it took a lot more energy from the TEC (28% increase from 176-watt TEC) to get an additional 5C (only 11% increase in Delta T).
Conclusions from the Examples
The larger the wattage of the TEC in proportion to the watts of heat generated by the heat load (CPU) the closer delta T approaches the theoretical limit of 69C. But, the closer you get to the theoretical limit (in this case 69C) the more and more watts it takes for the TEC to achieve it. Thus the less efficient it becomes. Fortunately itâ??s not like TECs were the kings of efficiency to begin with.
Also this is from xtremesystems on that same sticky on TEC.
- The Critical Element: Controlling the Temperature of the Hot-Side -
As we have seen from the example above, you must control the hot-sideâ??s temperature to achieve a given temperature on the cold-side. This, however, can be more difficult than it seems.
Letâ??s say Bob wants to cool his XP 2000+ which generates 60-watts of heat. Bob just so happens to have a â??Magic Heatsinkâ?? that magically cools a heat load of 60-watts to room temperature (in this case room temp is 25C, remember that). Not a bad heatsink (must be a Thermalright). So Bob figures, â??If I attach this bad boy to the hot-side of my 226-watt TEC then I can maintain room temperature on the hot-side of 25C, then the cold-side will be -26C assuming a Delta T = 51C.â?? Bob is about to get a rude awaking.
Whatâ??s Bobâ??s problem? The heat load generated on the hot-side of the 226-watt TEC is not just 60-watts anymore (the original heat output of his CPU). It is the original heat output of the CPU (60-watts) plus the Cooling Power of the TEC (226-watts). 60watts+226watts = 286-watts of heat generated on the hot-side of the TEC. Thatâ??s enough watts to heat 1 liter of water by 4.1C in one minute. See Bobâ??s problem? Well, itâ??s about to become yours.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEC's are horribly inefficient for water, and you guys honestly think AIR can cool them?? Dont make me laugh..