This point is always over exaggerated. Sure, pretty much every publication does touch ups, but rarely is the figure modified so much that it becomes a ridiculous example. Such an image would be cause a disconnect between the material and the reader.
I don't have a link for this at the moment, but I do recall reading that such touching up has been gradually increasing over time, so the changes year over year are imperceptible to most readers. However, I'm sure if you compare earlier photoshopped pics to current ones, there would be a startling difference.
Plus, where models truly thrive, the fashion world of runways and galleries, there is no photoshop.
Of course not, but you can't deny there's a problem in the industry. Models have died as a result of fashion designers' criteria (e.g. only allowing size 0). Some countries (e.g. Spain) have even banned underweight models http://eatingdisorders.suite101.com/article.cfm/anorexic_models
There is no anorexic epidemic in this country, but there is an obesity epidemic. Compare the obesity and anorexia related death rates and get back to me.
I didn't say there was an epidemic. I merely mentioned anorexic models to demonstrate a shift from one unhealthy extreme to the other.
What kind of children are we raising that the lack basic functions of common sense? I, as a child, was not incapable of separating fantasy and reality.
Body image is a complex issue, and thus children need help trying to understand the causes and effects. They can't necessarily tell that a skinny model on TV is unhealthy, or why. In fact they're so glamorized that children (especially young girls) can internalize that as the happy ideal.
Also, it's not "fantasy vs. reality" except for magazine pics. As you stated, skinny models do exist on tv.
Anyways, this comes down to good parenting, right? So I agree with you that there is a lack of good parenting today.
The body is the essence of true health, and is greatly underemphasized in today's world, when one is expected to sacrifice bodily health for financial, educational, or other measures of success.
It's actually overemphasized. Athletes, models, movie stars and porn stars use their physical capital to gain incredible financial capital. In contrast, people with high intellectual or creative capital are not rewarded to nearly the same degree.
As proof, look at the total income (salary and endorsements) of an NBA superstar vs. a Nobel Prize winning scientist (salary and awards). Not even close.
I agree, models should not be idolized. I can't see how anyone would want to be, or date, a model. But what I don't agree with is the angry perception the public holds the fashion world, or the world of all non-overweight people.. People are always upset at models for causing self-esteem issues, yet no one is mad at obese celebrities for putting a much less healthy image into the world.