Originally posted by: Garet Jax
Originally posted by: GermyBoy
No matter how many of you "law-abiding" citizens there are out there, the DMCA is wrong, and although is law, should be stopped. HOWEVER, writing to our local congressmen will not do anything when you have corporations like Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo lining the pockets of politicians to pass more laws like this.
Modchips and the selling of those should be legal. It is the USING them that should be illegal, and only for illegal purposes.
Suppose I sell a gun to people, which is not illegal. USING them is not illegal if you shoot "game" or at a range. Shooting PEOPLE and "not game" animals is illegal, and can get you jail time.
Same goes with alcohol. I sell it to someone. They USE it. They run someone over with a car. Now my selling is illegal, and I can get sued, but not before. The law is such crap.
The difference is that the chip is intended to be used illegally. There is no other use.
If someone came to you and said that they wanted a gun to kill someone and you sold them the gun they used then you would be as guilty as them.
In terms of the alcohol, if you sold someone alcohol who was already intoxicated and they indicated that were going to drive (or you suspected it) then you could also be found guilty.
Originally posted by: deftron
That's way too harsh..
Even Anandtech allows the sell of modchips in the For Sale/Trade forums..
By the way, funny quote from the article:
"and a $28,500 fine - that's £18,355 in real money."
LOL.. "real" money
Originally posted by: nater
well at least he was arrested for selling modchips and not for his site itself.
Originally posted by: zippy
Why is his arrest acceptable but people that sell descramblers can't be touched?
Both are being used to circumvent copyrights/steal services but in both cases the actual product does not allow for that - only the person actually performing the act constitutes circumventing copyrights/stealing. I realize I'm being idealistic here, but isn't that the case with descramblers? Why doesn't it correlate to mod chips?
Originally posted by: KeyserSoze
Damn, this pisses me off soooo freaking bad. Once we buy something, it's OURS!!! The company no longer has control over it, so let us MODIFY it any way we want.
Can you imagine how many Honda Civics would be impounded if this rule were to extend to cars too
I know, I need to let my senators know, and all that jazz. I need to start getting in touch with groups/organizations regarding the crappiness of the DMCA.
KeyserSoze
Originally posted by: NFS4
Umm, he broke the law and got busted. Nothing "messed up" about that.
Originally posted by: MedicBob
Originally posted by: NFS4
Umm, he broke the law and got busted. Nothing "messed up" about that.
I agree. If you are breaking the law and know it, suffer the penalties.
And the fact that people go to jail for selling mod chips is complete BS. I've got no problem with a hefty fine. But c'mon. Jail time?
What next? They going to subpoena his records and send inspectors to all who have bought a mod chip?
It?s the penalty itself that im shocked about. Especially considering how lenient we are towards other types of criminals in our judicial system.
Originally posted by: bsobel
And the fact that people go to jail for selling mod chips is complete BS. I've got no problem with a hefty fine. But c'mon. Jail time?
What next? They going to subpoena his records and send inspectors to all who have bought a mod chip?
Any why not, thats exactly what DirectTV is doing to those that bought stuff to modify sat receivers. And they are going after those users in civil court (apparently the average settelment is about $4k).
Bill
Originally posted by: dabuddha
It?s the penalty itself that im shocked about. Especially considering how lenient we are towards other types of criminals in our judicial system.
Originally posted by: Moralpanic
Originally posted by: dabuddha
It?s the penalty itself that im shocked about. Especially considering how lenient we are towards other types of criminals in our judicial system.
You find 5 months in prison and 28k fine 'shocking'?