Israel minister: Strike on Iran could be necessary

[fstime]

no in this case you cannot possibly mistake what you claimed netayahu said that beyond a shadow of a doubt for certain iran has Nukes.....with the statement Iran is close to having nukes!

Semantics hardly -- you out and out lied!!

So what, Netanyahoo still looks like a war monger claiming Iran has been close to have nukes 21 years ago.

So close means two decades with his logic?

 

[Jhhnn]

ahhh..poor Iran!! none of those countries surrounding Iran are a threat to Iran.

You can`t be that ignorant to believe that if Iran gets a nuke that they will not use it on Israel....or can you??

Standard hasbara fear mongering, huh?

Explain an Iranian rationale for nuking Israel, annihilating the Pals in the process, and bringing Israeli retribution that would annihilate their major cities.

"They're Craaazy!" won't cut it, particularly when the former head of Mossad says they're not-

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/16/meir-dagan-mossad-iran-attack-stupid_n_1888840.html

The only irrational screamers in this whole thing are people like you, and their leader, Netanyahu.

 

[iGas]

Ignorant fools like you think having nukes will somehow equalize the game obviously can't think beyond today or tomorrow. There can be no equalization of power to countries just trying to get the nuke nowadays. That time has come and gone. Now their entire country could be obliterated if they get the nuke all because their desire to 'level the playing field'. More nukes don't equalize anything, they just guarantee more destruction.

Ignoramus fool like you would think that others wouldn't seek nuclear weapons as an equalizer. Do not forget that the US is the only country that ever use nuclear bombs, and currently terrorizes and threaten everyone on this planet.

 

[MarkLuvsCS]

Ignoramus fool like you would think that others wouldn't seek nuclear weapons as an equalizer. Do not forget that the US is the only country that ever use nuclear bombs, and currently terrorizes and threaten everyone on this planet.

What do you think happens when they get one? They've just painted a target on themselves, and if you think they could just have a few nukes for protection, how would the countries in the immediate vicinity feel of Iran having nukes. They don't have the capabilities of hitting the west, but they will force the hand of the other global powers. Even China was ready to give up on North Korea when they became overly aggressive. Yes the US was the only country to use them, but thankfully they did decades ago before we perfected the technology. Only a few hundred thousand Japanese died to teach the world a lesson. The world learned that nuclear weapons were not weapons of war but weapons of annihilation. This is why they don't want more countries to get the nukes, because it doesn't level anything, it just helps bring about complete destruction.

 

[iGas]

What do you think happens when they get one? They've just painted a target on themselves, and if you think they could just have a few nukes for protection, how would the countries in the immediate vicinity feel of Iran having nukes. They don't have the capabilities of hitting the west, but they will force the hand of the other global powers. Even China was ready to give up on North Korea when they became overly aggressive. Yes the US was the only country to use them, but thankfully they did decades ago before we perfected the technology. Only a few hundred thousand Japanese died to teach the world a lesson. The world learned that nuclear weapons were not weapons of war but weapons of annihilation. This is why they don't want more countries to get the nukes, because it doesn't level anything, it just helps bring about complete destruction.

Do you think that the US, Russia, China, UK, France, India, Pakistan, and Israel are responsible enough to possess nuclear weapons? IMHO, nuclear powers are hypocrites other wise they would all got rid of their nuclear weapons stockpile by now to make the world a bit safer.

And, who do you think that theses nuclear weapons are being pointed at?

If the US are spying and tramples on their own citizen rights, then they are capable of inciting hates and robs/steals from non US citizens. Errr, wait a minute, the US are not just capable of, they are doing it at the moment with Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Egypt, Syria, and Israel (supporting the Zionists with weapons to attack Palestinians), among many other countries.

I'm not trying to justify that seeking or owning nuclear weapons is right. I'm implying that the genie is out of the bottle, and everyone are going to seek nuclear capability with or with out the US approvals. Case in point, Israel, North Korea, India, and Pakistan. And, I'm implying that it doesn't help the situation any because countries such as Iran feels threaten due to the fact that they are being surrounded by their enemies.

 

[Anarchist420]

the thing i've always found unusual is that most jews today claim palestine as their ancestral homeland yet they are more european than most people self-identifying as european today and i found something yesterday which confirmed what i had always thought.

that is, the maternal ancestors of the jews were in europe (but not the middle east) well before my direct maternal line was and modern europeans are much closer to arabs on their direct maternal line... arabs and modern europeans are descended from cro-magnon subsaharan eve on the maternal side, while jews and old europeans descend from a neanderthal eve.

anyway, it looks like stormfront is going to have change their definition of "white" from "of wholly european descent" to "of wholly Old European descent", "wholly Modern European Descent", or "self identifies as white". or they can drop the nationalism altogether.

 

[EagleKeeper]

the thing i've always found unusual is that most jews today claim palestine as their ancestral homeland yet they are more european than most people self-identifying as european today and i found something yesterday which confirmed what i had always thought.

that is, the maternal ancestors of the jews were in europe (but not the middle east) well before my direct maternal line was and modern europeans are much closer to arabs on their direct maternal line... arabs and modern europeans are descended from cro-magnon subsaharan eve on the maternal side, while jews and old europeans descend from a neanderthal eve.

anyway, it looks like stormfront is going to have change their definition of "white" from "of wholly european descent" to "of wholly Old European descent", "wholly Modern European Descent", or "self identifies as white". or they can drop the nationalism altogether.

Given that the Jews were in the majority, when cleared out of old Palestine, it would make sense for many to get to Europe. Closest land area that was decent for travel.