Well instead of fighting in areas where the civilians have been evacuated, the Hamas fighters either force the civilians to sit tight with them or follow the evacuees to those declared safe zones that then become battlezones because of the hugging tactics the Hamas fighters employ.
There's also this situation where it becomes practically impossible to discern who are civilians and who are Hamas fighters until they start killing Israelis. To me that piles on a lot more civilian casualties because the Israelis aren't going to risk their own lives wasting that precious second that determine who's left standing after a shootout.
To my knowledge, to be "fair and balanced" about what's going on between Hamas, their Palestinian human shields and the Israelis, what I've previously described is something that I think needs to be mentioned as often as needed. That it's not being mentioned at all by our own media outlets seems odd and suspect to me.
I'm not sure if you're trying for some weird satire such that you're resorting to such clowntics as claiming you're being "fair and balanced" a notoriously full of shit claim by a news organization operating as a propaganda arm of a political party, but if you are, you really need to work on your bit.
If you guys really wanna get into arguments, should Americans be supporting the people that enabled the murder of Jesus? I mean, it all goes back to that, does it not? We can have our cake and eat it too, let's call up Italy and ask if they'll re-open the Coliseum, then we go in and kidnap Hamas and Israel can pick their fighters, and we can really go viral by roping in the Tiger King to provide the tigers! Meanwhile, we can keep exporting weapons to Israel, rocks, slingshots, and the like, maybe some horses and knights. And if they have a problem with that, then we could just stop sending them weapons entirely, and hey they've rationalized that Palestinians throwing rocks is worthy of rolling in with tanks and shooting them, so clearly they're weapons of mass destruction!
Citation please, and also you might want to read up about Israel bombing evacuation areas.
Also:
TLDR: A chronic lack of evidence to support Israel's assertions and some people here keep throwing around is if it's a fact.
I suspect there's a good reason for that, especially as most MSM is pretty pro-Israel from what I've seen.
Yeah, not sure why that dipshit thinks media would bother trying to make supposedly rational "fair and balanced" arguments like that when they're usually just spewing whatever lies (beheaded babies for instance) and propaganda the Israeli military tells them without fact checking it at all (until it blows up in their faces - sometimes literally due to Israeli military shooting journalists and bombing news organizations, oh and look at that, Israel claiming the news orgs were effectively functioning as human shields for a Hamas command center).
But look, he's not being biased at all, but like why aren't we calling for the brutal murder of all Palestinians because of the barbaric Hamas? Its super ok to just indiscriminately murder civilians because like Hamas is using them as human shields, so kill 'em all! That's totally not barbaric! Then again, maybe we should be asking why isn't he going and standing amongst the fine Israeli military since he's so certain that will immediately remove all ability to criticize a group and will totally make any attempt at attacking Israeli military either literally or figuratively, the worse thing you could ever do!
There was an interesting episode of Darknet Diaries I listened to recently, and there was a former Mossad agent who made a hilariously bungling attempt at being a spy, but after that jackass blundered his way to being exposed, they tried to go after a PI they'd hired to help them on their campaign to discredit security researchers (that were exposing the horrible shit NSO group was doing), and the PI was saying how they just were focused on "how much were the reporters paying you" because they don't understand legit journalism, they view it all as propaganda war, swayed by money. Which sadly isn't wrong, but it also isn't correct, and their assumption that the guy was doing it out of money left him flabbergasted (and the PI I think was Russian/Ukrainian and so was likely quite aware of such normalized corruption). To add to the dipshittery they wanted to make the PI take a polygraph to prove the reporter hadn't paid him. The kicker though, the PI actually had been secretly running opposition because he found out the initial hiring was because they were working for Harvey Weinstein trying to smear his accusers and he thought that was so gross, so when he found out they were digging up dirt on Ronan Farrow and others, he ended up informing Ronan and then was feeding what was happening, which helped fuckup the dumbass spy and his attempt to smear the security researcher (who already assumed that was happening because of attempts on others, and the dumbass spy setting up the meeting under the premis of learning about using cameras on kites for surveillance - which the security researched points out makes very little sense in an age where drones are quite cheap and far more effective). Oh and their method was to try to wine and dine the researcher and goad him into saying some fucked up racist/bigoted stuff (by them saying the racist bigoted stuff and being like "you agree, yes" like they're Borat or something, like holy shit this guy was a fucking clownfucking dipshit, not unlike the "security researchers" that uncoverd the "unrepairable" Ryzen exploits a few years back). This is the type of shit that is just normal accepted behavior with Israeli "intelligence". Oh, and don't forget the US set export bans for aiding NSO group, since we know they're full of shit and have been using their exploits for awful shit, including it being used as part of the Saudi murder of Jamal Kashoggi.