... It's a cold calculation, but you're going to struggle to convince me that stronger terrorists would result in peace, stability, and less death.
You are correct. Israel is the strongest, most vicious terrorist in the region and has never brought about "peace, stability, and less death".
Everything it has done since its creation was to solidify the permanence of its illegal land seizures and ethnically cleanse the indigenous populations with the aim of eventually annexing all the occupied territories.
All their actions would necessitate the emergence of resistance, yes violent resistance to them as would occur anywhere else in the world with any other peoples who have been routinely murdered, homes demolished, children slaughtered to make way for illegal settlements to replace them.
The narrative, which is widespread in the MSM, is that legit resistance movements are terrorists and the real terrorists with a record of genocidal tendencies and a history of unmitigated slaughter of innocents are somehow the 'good guys'.
The US is not supporting Israel out of a belief in their cause or whatever strategic interests it may provide, but rather completely out of political coercion from a Zio-lobby which you seem completely oblivious to. You think their statements of support are genuine, but every admin that has dealt with the Israels practically despises them. I know official statements of support from US admins are taken at face value by many gullible folks, but sadly they do have an impact on misinforming the masses.
I can also understand that many who are unfamiliar with the conflict can acquire ridiculously misinformed views from a warped MSM that leaves out much vital info or context due to pressures from antisemitism brigades or big businesses that may withhold advertising revenues. While other parts of the MSM are run by Zio-maniacs like the Murdochs of the world and which basically serve as Israels propaganda machine.
Your gullibility is a testament to that.