It's the reason for all the traffic to Diego Garcia. No other real reason to have 8 B-2s moved there in the last month.
The tail that wags the dog...
Israel will “lead” a military strike along with the US against Iran if nuclear talks don’t succeed, US President Donald Trump says... (meaning Israel is going to drag the US into a war with Iran regardless of our best interests and we will be subservient to their wishes)
Trump: Israel will ‘be the leader’ of strike on Iran if nuclear talks fail
* * *www.timesofisrael.com
'If you attempt to build nuclear weapons we will bomb you' seems like a great incentive to build nuclear weapons.It's the reason for all the traffic to Diego Garcia. No other real reason to have 8 B-2s moved there in the last month.
'If you attempt to build nuclear weapons we will bomb you' seems like a great incentive to build nuclear weapons.
Iran will either have nuclear weapons or will have a situation where they can rapidly make them if they choose to within 10 years IMO.And it seems unlikely that the US would be able to prevent this with just air power alone.
Iran will either have nuclear weapons or will have a situation where they can rapidly make them if they choose to within 10 years IMO.
The simple reason is they know the US is implacably hostile to them, they know the US can't be trusted, and they know the US never pulls this shit with North Korea.
The Boomers and Gen X will never let go of the humiliation of the embassy hostage crisis. It’s one of those issues where we have to wait people out to get to a point where rational engagement is possible. The Iranians overthrowing the mullahs would help.I believe the US position on Iran is almost entirely driven by Israeli manipulation. As they did with Iraq and the Bush admin where they plied them with false Intel and pushed the US into the Iraq war. Pro-Israel lobbies (AIPAC) are what largely drive Mid-east policies.
If war breaks out, this what I think Israels objectives would be. While media attention will be entirely focused on Iran and the unfolding conflict, Israel will implement the final solution vs the Pals and ethnically cleanse them from the West Bank. This will not get much media attention compared to an Iran conflict. They will also push for more Lebensraum and seize more territory from Syria. The right wingers in govt are frequently talking of Greater Israel and this would be their chance to do it, esp with Iran out of the picture. The UN will be powerless to do anything as everything will be vetoed by the US at the Security Council. The UN will be as meaningless as the League of Nations pre-WWII.
Turkey will say hello. Only so much BS they are willing to take in Syria.The UN will be powerless to do anything as everything will be vetoed by the US at the Security Council. The UN will be as meaningless as the League of Nations pre-WWII.
Boomers and Gen X? Bet they are mostly hard core Zio-nuts who also approve of Israels genocide.The Boomers and Gen X will never let go of the humiliation of the embassy hostage crisis. It’s one of those issues where we have to wait people out to get to a point where rational engagement is possible. The Iranians overthrowing the mullahs would help.
Israel has already taken over 400 sq km of Syrian territory since the fall of Assad. Turkey did fuck all. Israel over time will continue to take more and more territory, as long as it doesnt get too close to Turkey. Syria is 184000 sq km. If Israel manages to occupy 1/10 of that, they've almost doubled the size of Israel proper. And who is going to use nukes to stop them?Turkey will say hello. Only so much BS they are willing to take in Syria.
Certain nations do not need the UN to "deal" with Israel.
It also invokes one hell of a question... what it would mean to do that without also invoking nuclear war.
After they start building settlements, of course, the next thing they'll need is a new buffer zone.Its not a temporary occupation. These 'tourists' are likely surveying where their next settlements will be.
The art of BS is that it's just fodder / fuel for propaganda.I'm surprised that Israel doesn't vary its bullshit excuses. Why are they always Hamas command centres?
To be clear, and as someone who is against misrepresentation, there is no Israeli oversight of Facebook. They do have a unit that flags things on Facebook but that’s very different.BBC called out after bringing headline in doubt with "Hamas says" hospital struck. They couldnt say The Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem which is a much more believable source said that, nor could they say the Israeli military said they struck the hospital. After being called out by readers, headline changed.
As with Facebook, wonder if the BBC also have an Israeli govt official overseeing Israels PR efforts. They've been called out numerous times over such journalistic malpractice since conflict began.
View attachment 122047
Iran only needs to promise emperor Trump they will help develop Gaza Bech front property and he will let them develop all the nukes they want.Iran will either have nuclear weapons or will have a situation where they can rapidly make them if they choose to within 10 years IMO.
The simple reason is they know the US is implacably hostile to them, they know the US can't be trusted, and they know the US never pulls this shit with North Korea.
Yes, an Israeli official that selectively flags things, whether factual, incorrect or incomplete thus rendering the information distorted. Its allowed, legit, sure. Just doesnt help the companies rep or image. Shareholders have a right to demand transparency and to know how its being implemented.To be clear, and as someone who is against misrepresentation, there is no Israeli oversight of Facebook. They do have a unit that flags things on Facebook but that’s very different.
By that logic I ‘oversee’ Facebook as I could make the same requests.Yes, an Israeli official that selectively flags things, whether factual, incorrect or incomplete thus rendering the information distorted. Its allowed, legit, sure. Just doesnt help the companies rep or image. Shareholders have a right to demand transparency and to know how its being implemented.