There are almost no small rocket propelled explosives that can cause that much infrastructure damage to a hospital. Even 10 rockets hitting simultaneously couldn't do that.
It had to be an airstrike with a large missile or bomb.
There are almost no small rocket propelled explosives that can cause that much infrastructure damage to a hospital. Even 10 rockets hitting simultaneously couldn't do that.
this BBC reporter finds it rather odd that they have never seen one of the rockets that Hamas regularly launches make that big of a boom, not even when a number hit the same target
They sometimes get lucky with a grain of truth in a wheat field if lies and they excel at riding that grain.The difference is that MAGAs never substanciate anything, they just throw slogans and that s all, dont count on them providing anything even remotely scientific.
Not a lot of people are honnest enough to aknowledge that they actually supported criminals, that s the human nature, so if during longs years you were fooled by a very efficient israeli propaganda machine you ll have difficulties accepting that this regime could behave badly, and yet there s tons of exemple like the abject massacre in 2014.
As pointed by Mark Twain it s much more difficult to convince someone that he was fooled than to fool him on the first place, because no one is kin to accept that he lacked intelligence.
And the israeli "prove" that they are not the culprit, just trust my words, lol, im not the bad guy, it s the other side...
Erm, that happened too fast. Even if you had a hypothetical armed warhead that could somehow detonate on contact with the hospital, and even if it was at an absolute perfect angle to fall directly on said hospital, that air explosion happened like 3 seconds before the hospital did, and that warhead was a few hundred feet up at minimum. Too far away, angles are too specific, requirements on the survival and detonation of a separated warhead too specific, and momentum is a bitch. I'm not buying that theory for a second.
Yeah, you're right. You've convinced me. It's hard to argue against your CLEARLY demonstrated expertise in:
1) vetting of random twitter sources/accounts for their reliability
2) Israeli/US weapons systems
3) Homemade Hamas munitions capabilities
4) aerodynamics
5) geo-location
6) Forensic audio analysis (combined w/#2)
Coupling all of the above with random personal shots and a splash of attempted literary flair sure has won me over. Sure did beat simple logical reason as to who benefits most ...
You forgot :
7) Rockets that suddenly go backward a few seconds after that were launched.
Bla bla, anything that fuel the israeli propaganda narrative is good to believe, they will present lies as usual to cover their war crimes, like the faked news of beheaded babies wich is still propagated by half brained like de Santis and other retardeds...
If Hamas had that powerfull weapons there would be much more devastation in israel, theres s scores of impacts pics, their rockets just manage to make a hole a few metres in a wall at best and barely one metre when hitting the ground.
I mean that certainly is conclusive, iron-clad proof.
/giggle
Moreover when we can see that not a single rocket was destroyed, they were not close enough of the israeli controled territory...
As with this iron-clad thats more of a golden eggs chicken for the US weaponry industry...
The CURRENT timeline of propaganda:
- We blew up a hospital because Hamas was hiding there.
- It was a misfired Hamas rocket.
- We warned them to evacuate the hospital.
- Here are videos of a misfired Hamas rocket.
- OK, the timestamps/years are wrong. Here is the actual video of the misfired Hamas rocket.
- OK, that video also has the wrong timestamp.
- The death toll is exaggerated.
- Here is a supposed call between two Hamas agents with perfect clarity discussing the rocket explosion in excruciating detail, including names and locations, with terms like "Israeli shrapnel."
- We bombed the hospital garage, but there were no direct hits on the hospital.
reminds me of this from 2004
View attachment 87344
”Clearly”The difference is that MAGAs never substanciate anything, they just throw slogans and that s all, dont count on them providing anything even remotely scientific.
You forgot :
7) Rockets that suddenly go backward a few seconds after that were launched.
Where is the crater from the Israeli JDAM? I see mostly flash/fire damage and not a blast wave damage you would expect from a JDAM.
I'm probably leaning toward either a launch failure or debris from an intercept falling on the hospital parking lot. People were talking like there was massive structural damage and so far the photos from reliable sources indicate that is not the case. Biden would likely not say what he did without a fairly convincing assessment either.
This does not really look like the result of an IDF strike right now.