Dude, you are in a forum where opinions are routinely expressed. The link does not establish proof of anything, only samples of routine disinfo that Israel engages in. Yes, I do believe that Israel is the most dishonest nation in the world simply because they have to be to prop up their Zio project from disintegrating into a pariah state due to its numerous violations of int'l laws, the Geneva Conventions, UN resolutions and humanitarian laws. (you want proof of these, lists are ready)
You say terms like genocide and apartheid are "hyperbole". Do you disagree that what the Zio-state is doing in the West Bank is not apartheid with their stealing lands, establishing settlements connected with Jewish only roads that corral Pal communities like sheep and restrict their movements, tear up their farm lands and limit their water supplies is not a disgusting form of apartheid? Aside from Hebron where Pals shops, market place have shut down due to streets connecting to it being Jews only streets and where checkpoints are setup everywhere that harass Pals when going to schools or hospitals or their homes (you want proof of these, its also available). The overwhelming take from all that is the horrific inequality and subjugation of another people deemed racially inferior to the Jews. Anyone saying that is not apartheid would also have to be a very dishonest person.
ALL THAT is not widely known in the US/West because the Lobby and MSM they influence prevent such disturbing info about the Zio state from spreading. Therefore a continuous torrent of lies and disinfo to cover it up is required to prevent Israel from becoming the pariah state it deserves to be. That is what I base my opinion on. You can deflect all you want in demanding some sort of mathematical proof that Russia or whoever lies more than Israel to somehow 'absolve it' from its sordid state but its all just deflection.
Re the term 'genocide', its a matter of degree and method. Some are calling Gaza
"A Textbook Case of Genocide". You can bend the term in whichever way you want to arrive at whatever conclusion you want, but it also seems like a deflection from other points you dont like to hear.
Re the Israeli historians, I have read enough excerpts from their works (esp Ilan Pappe) who base their work on actual Israeli war and military documents that were classified after the 1948 war to prevent their damaging nature from hurting the Israeli narrative. Decades later, the records were declassified and revealed that the Jews were not the purported victims who were about to be over-run by their (hopelessly weak and disorganized) neighbors and where most of the Pals were ethnically cleansed through brute force and not simply left their homes for greener pastures.
You may fish for your minor deflection points and deflect away. I know thats all you are interested in is to shift discussion away from examples I provided like West Bank apartheid which really hurt the Zios image, to other less impactful areas like precise definitions or other inconsequential points. I actually believe you are a genuine part of the Zio-disinfo campaign, esp when you mentioned the term apartheid as 'hyperbole' when you VERY WELL KNOW that it exists on a horrible level in the West Bank ( "Judea and Samaria" as you would call it).