It's no surprise. Islam's roots are based on Judaism, though you'll never hear many Muslims admit that.
It's no surprise. Islam's roots are based on Judaism, though you'll never hear many Muslims admit that.Not to mention that Judaism has since the exodus considered Israel its only Holy Land and Christianity sprang from Israel, especially Jerusalem. Compare that to Islam, whose prophet never even visited it except for making claim to have flown over it in a dream. The only reason Israel is holy to the Muslims is that all ground ever held or inhabited by Muslims they consider to be rightfully theirs in perpetuity.
Was I firing rockets at your house before you set up this perimeter and limited my access to soda and potato chips?If I came and set up a perimeter around your house to limit your access to food and such, would you contend that you couldn't rightly call my actions illegal until a court ruled as much?
Many Muslim terrorists think it's funny and love it. You're in righteous company.Murder is so funny Love it.
To make the analogy appropriate; no, but your father was, because I murdered your mother and drove the rest of your family out of your old house at gunpoint to make it my own.Was I firing rockets at your house before you set up this perimeter and limited my access to soda and potato chips?
To make the analogy appropriate; no, but your father was, because I murdered your mother and drove the rest of your family out of your old house at gunpoint to make it my own.
By the way, did you ever figure out how dawn breaking behind the ship proves it was headed away from Gaza?
Rather the captain was worried about the intent of some passengers to resist Israeli violence by fighting back. I've not been ignoring the videos, and rather have seen them before you posted them. Rather, I just generally ignore your inane mischaracterizations of them.Though the interview with the ship's captain is with Israelis, it confirms that he was extremely worried by the violent intent of his passengers.
So my father was shooting rockets at your innocent neighbors and their children from my house? Well then I guess your newly formed perimeter comes as no surprise at all.To make the analogy appropriate; no, but your father was, because I murdered your mother and drove the rest of your family out of your old house at gunpoint to make it my own.
Perhaps you're right. However, the breaking dawn occurs near the very end of the 62 minute video. The hour long footage was obviously edited/cut prior to release because several real hours went by during the timespan covered by the edited 62 minute video. So, at the end of the day, I really have no idea when the ship actually turned around.By the way, did you ever figure out how dawn breaking behind the ship proves it was headed away from Gaza?
Actually, the Captain makes it quite clear that he personally did not want the passengers to intentionally cause a disturbance by violently resisting the boarding party.Rather the captain was worried about the intent of some passengers to resist Israeli violence by fighting back. I've not been ignoring the videos, and rather have seen them before you posted them. Rather, I just generally ignore your inane mischaracterizations of them.
Rather the captain was worried about the intent of some passengers to resist Israeli violence by fighting back. I've not been ignoring the videos, and rather have seen them before you posted them. Rather, I just generally ignore your inane mischaracterizations of them.
Rather the captain was worried about the intent of some passengers to resist Israeli violence by fighting back. I've not been ignoring the videos, and rather have seen them before you posted them. Rather, I just generally ignore your inane mischaracterizations of them.
So my father was shooting rockets at your innocent neighbors and their children from my house? Well then I guess your newly formed perimeter comes as no surprise at all.
I wonder what it must feel like when you bury your head in the sand like an ostrich. Cool?
That doesn't make it any of it any less wrong; not me having robbed you of your previous home, not your father shooting rockets at my neighbors, and not me refusing to make amends for my previous wrongs and rather setting up a perimeter around your new home to inflict suffering on your family instead.So my father was shooting rockets at your innocent neighbors and their children from my house? Well then I guess your newly formed perimeter comes as no surprise at all.
That's just a flagrant mischaracterization of the situation.Perhaps I should call my Uncle in Italy and ask him to grab 49 of his knife/pipe wielding mafia friends. I'll tell him that they should come down and try to bust through your perimeter to bring me some Doritos and Pepsi... hmmm... maybe I should tell him to show up in Ice Cream Trucks so that you don't catch on to our master plan...?
I'm really sick of eating all these vegetables and lamb, so I sure do hope he gets here soon...
There's no "perhaps" about the fact that the ship had turned away from Gaza by the time dawn broke, but you are right to suggest that it doesn't prove the ship turned around prior to Israel attacking it. I'd seen a report that they did, but am unable to locate that now, or any other report of exactly what time the ship changed course.Perhaps you're right. However, the breaking dawn occurs near the very end of the 62 minute video.
Granted, figuring out that the ship was traveling away from Gaza when dawn broke isn't nearly as impressive of a feat, but it's a matter of deductive reasoning much the same.Our Rabbis taught: It once happened that two men [Jews] were taken captive on Mount Carmel, and their captor was walking behind them. One of them said to the other, ‘The camel walking in front of us is blind in one eye, and is laden with two barrels, one of wine, and the other of oil, and of the two men leading it, one is a Jew, and the other a heathen.’ Their captor said to them, ‘Ye stiff-necked people, whence do ye know this?’ They replied, ‘Because the camel is eating of the herbs before it only on the side where it can see, but not on the other, where it cannot see. It is laden with two barrels, one of wine and the other of oil: because wine drips and is absorbed [into the earth], whilst oil drips and rests [on the surface]. And of the two men leading it, one is a Jew, and the other a heathen: because a heathen obeys the call of Nature in the roadway, whilst a Jew turns aside.’ He hastened after them, and found that it was as they had said. So he went and kissed them on the head, brought them into his house, and prepared a great feast for them. He danced [with joy] before them and exclaimed ‘Blessed be He who made choice of Abraham's seed and imparted to them of His wisdom, and wherever they go they become princes to their masters!’ Then he liberated them, and they went home in peace.
That's quite a fanciful tale you have there. In reality, one couldn't even hope to build anything like the Twin Towers and have them come down as they did without employing lots of explosives, even if specifically attempting to design and construct such buildings to come down without. WTC 7 couldn't have came down as it did without having been rigged to do so either, though I've not seen enough evidence on that to rule out means other than explosives there. As for the Pentagon, best I can tell the damage to that was solely the result of the jet hitting it. In regard to prior knowledge in the administration, I'm guessing some knew at least a bit of what was planned, but doubt Bush had a clue, and figure others were only let in on the plan as much as was necessary to implicate them in it, so they would have to cover it up to protect themselves.A fairy tale :
Those building where never supposed to go down as they did. (construction errors and use of highly ignitable /cheap materials out of greed a long time ago ?) The attacks on the WTC without collapsing and the pentagon would have been enough incentive or motivation to legislate counter measures. Prior knowledge from the former administration together with greed from the past caused the current recent past. This is not only probable but also fitted the behaviour of the former administration together with the always existing chance of the wrong choice out of greed.
That's quite a fanciful tale you have there. In reality, one couldn't even hope to build anything like the Twin Towers and have them come down as they did without employing lots of explosives, even if specifically attempting to design and construct such buildings to come down without. WTC 7 couldn't have came down as it did without having been rigged to do so either, though I've not seen enough evidence on that to rule out means other than explosives there. As for the Pentagon, best I can tell the damage to that was solely the result of the jet hitting it. In regard to prior knowledge in the administration, I'm guessing some knew at least a bit of what was planned, but doubt Bush had a clue, and figure others were only let in on the plan as much as was necessary to implicate them in it, so they would have to cover it up to protect themselves.
This is no peace group. It is a violent and pumped up group intent on attacking Israeli boarders.
Israel disgraced itself. Next vessel to run the blockade should be torpedoed.
Of course you do, and that is exactly what the people who rigged the buildings to come down expect you to do.I find it amusing that you can believe in the notion that a building is rigged with explosives without anybody knowing about it and feeling guilt or remorse and spilling their guts sooner or later while you find it impossible to believe that errors can be made in construction. Indirect errors or not.
That doesn't even come close to explaining what happened, which is why neither the official "investigations" nor anyone has produced any semblance of experimental confirmation to support such notions, nor will anyone ever do so. Seriously, you might as well be defending theories of psychic spoon bending for all the demonstration of reproducibility you ever could have to support your beliefs.When an object transfers energy to another object, that energy has to go somewhere. Kinetic energy and potential energy comes to mind. Aging of materials. Use of non proper materials...
Your sole intent is to stop the rockets and protect your own civilians, right? I can understand that. I do appreciate all the food and tons of aid you are letting through though. Thank you for that -- at least we're not starving! But, like I said, the veggies and lamb are getting old, so some Pepsi and Doritos sound fantastic!That doesn't make it any of it any less wrong; not me having robbed you of your previous home, not your father shooting rockets at my neighbors, and not me refusing to make amends for my previous wrongs and rather setting up a perimeter around your new home to inflict suffering on your family instead.
No, actually it isn't.That's just a flagrant mischaracterization of the situation.
I'd say that the time they actually turned around is a pretty important factor, wouldn't you?There's no "perhaps" about the fact that the ship had turned away from Gaza by the time dawn broke, but you are right to suggest that it doesn't prove the ship turned around prior to Israel attacking it. I'd seen a report that they did, but am unable to locate that now, or any other report of exactly what time the ship changed course.
Not "sole" by any stretch, as I'm not such a selfish fool as to imagine one can bring peace without justice. Perhaps this might help you understand my position better, though I won't hold my breath.Your sole intent is to stop the rockets and protect your own civilians, right?