Sure does. I love giving people rides in my "piece of crap Chrysler." Always fun.
It looks like he cemented his opinions with the often-crappy domestic vehicles of the 70s-90s era, and hasn't figured out that not everything is black and white any more.
Well, if you never post then how would I know what your opinion is? This is part of the problem. You people seem to think that I remember what every one of you drives and where you stand on everything. I don't.
I have met some people here personally, even had one into my home. I know what a few others drive because they post here regularly. I'd like to think I'm not as polarizing a figure as alky but who knows...
Sometimes I wish we didn't have a post count.
I don't get the hate of the ILX.
I wouldn't buy one. I think it's ass-ugly.
But I guess if you want a luxorified Civic with an engine that will probably go 400k miles before needing new rings and a transmission that will likely go over 300k miles and no major maintenance repairs until after 200k miles (radiator / torn CV boots etc.) ... why not?
Hard to go wrong with a 4 cylinder Honda. Really, really damn hard to go wrong.
No, I wouldn't get the ILX ... TSX, sure.
I travel 100 miles on the interstate 5 days a week and approx. 3/4ths of the vehicles broke down along the road are domestic brands. Can't make shit like that up, it is what it is.
The only problem I have with the ILX is the fact that it was a meager attempt at bringing back the legendary Integra. Times have changed, but really hate how options for fun are really limited.
This article by Car and Driver aptly articulates the ILX.
And if you live in the city, as I and millions of other people do, you will realize that highway mpg is absolutely meaningless.
I really don't understand why people talk about fuel economy period. I drive an S4 which is about as bad as you get on gas mileage considering I have a lead food and love to open up that car constantly.
At 12,000 miles a year you take a car that gets say 23 miles a gallon on average (city/hwy) and you will spend $1,930 on gas at $3.70 a gallon. My car i average a flat 18.0 and I'll pay $2,466 a gallon. So over the course of the year I'd save a whopping $500 bucks. When you are spending thousands upon thousands of dollars it's just not that big of a deal. there are so many other areas people waste money from cell phones to cable (i pay a lot for those too) that I just can't bring myself to even care a little bit.
you may want to re read that.....
Yep, they should have dropped the 150hp i4 completely. Inexcusable for a car that typically stickers much closer to $30k than 20 off the floor. And then the 200hp version is still weak on torque, and available only with a manual. I love manuals and only buy them, but most people buy autos. Acura continues to confuse.
I don't get the hate of the ILX.
I wouldn't buy one. I think it's ass-ugly.
But I guess if you want a luxorified Civic with an engine that will probably go 400k miles before needing new rings and a transmission that will likely go over 300k miles and no major maintenance repairs until after 200k miles (radiator / torn CV boots etc.) ... why not?
Hard to go wrong with a 4 cylinder Honda. Really, really damn hard to go wrong.
No, I wouldn't get the ILX ... TSX, sure.
I travel 100 miles on the interstate 5 days a week and approx. 3/4ths of the vehicles broke down along the road are domestic brands. Can't make shit like that up, it is what it is.
I don't think it's hate as much as the stupidity of a "luxury" version of an econobox. If GM tried to rebadge the Cruze as a Cadillac, it would be relentlessly mocked and rightfully so.
I really don't understand why people talk about fuel economy period. I drive an S4 which is about as bad as you get on gas mileage considering I have a lead food and love to open up that car constantly.
At 12,000 miles a year you take a car that gets say 23 miles a gallon on average (city/hwy) and you will spend $1,930 on gas at $3.70 a gallon. My car i average a flat 18.0 and I'll pay $2,466 a gallon. So over the course of the year I'd save a whopping $500 bucks. When you are spending thousands upon thousands of dollars for a car, it's just not that big of a deal. there are so many other areas people waste money from cell phones to cable (i pay a lot for those too) that I just can't bring myself to even care a little bit.
For me it works out to almost $200/month I'll save in gas. Not exactly a small amount of money. I was going to buy a new car regardless but this just made it all the more attractive an option. I was looking at 1 year old luxury cars as they are a relative bargain but not only was the car I bought far less expensive than the cars I was looking at but it gets twice the mileage.
That's a lie. The Camry has more American content than any other car, period.
http://www.cars.com/go/advice/Story.jsp?section=top&subject=ami
None of the "American" cars my family owns are actually built here, they are built in Canada and Mexico. "Buy American", get a Honda or Toyota.
The problem is in the 80's the two GM cars looked almost identical except for the badge. The ILX at least looks different (similar, but different) and the interior is completely different.I don't think it's hate as much as the stupidity of a "luxury" version of an econobox. If GM tried to rebadge the Cruze as a Cadillac, it would be relentlessly mocked and rightfully so.
How many miles do you drive? And were these using EPA numebrs or actual gas numbers?
I can answer this. Jules always refers to his real work mpg numbers.For me it works out to almost $200/month I'll save in gas. Not exactly a small amount of money. I was going to buy a new car regardless but this just made it all the more attractive an option. I was looking at 1 year old luxury cars as they are a relative bargain but not only was the car I bought far less expensive than the cars I was looking at but it gets twice the mileage.
I can answer this. Jules always refers to his real work mpg numbers.
In my case, my CR-Z nets me about 40mpg on average. The car it replaced averaged low 20's. And the CR-Z didn't cost me any more than the other cars I was looking at. Fuel economy wasn't my main consideration but I'm not complaining. Now, if the hybrid is significantly more expensive then of course its probably pointless to spend the money up front unless you drive A LOT.
Yeah that would save me about $1,500 a year or so in gas. On the other hand I already overspent when you compare cars too. Comes down to different priorities there.
Not sure the hybrids ever make sense though from what I understand of the battery tech and the cost to replace.
The problem is in the 80's the two GM cars looked almost identical except for the badge. The ILX at least looks different (similar, but different) and the interior is completely different.
Also, Acura isn't being that dense as far as powertrain choices. Not completely anyway. Remember the Integra GS-R wasn't available with an automatic. Granted, the base model wasn't limited to automatic only but there's some method to the madness. And of course the ILX is loaded with features that simply aren't available in a Civic Si. Now, is it worth $5k more? That's for the buyer to decide. However at the $30k price point I would have trouble choosing the ILX.
Only pointing out some facts.
It's 27k for a base ILX which doesn't appear to be loaded with features compared to the regular Civic. It takes 31k to get the 2 liter version with Nav and technology features that are not much more than a loaded Civic. When you compare the the 29k 6sp ILX which is more comparable to the Si, it does not even offer Nav or any of the fancy technology. Besides an interior that's arranged differently, how is in more loaded? What really sets the ILX apart from the Civic?