Originally posted by: Gooberlx2
Originally posted by: n yusef
I did not say that. I said that society assumes certain behavior. If people, women and men, are raised with the expectation that women will quit her job, regardless of how much she likes it or how much she's making, to raise children, then most people will live like this. I'm not saying that women are helpless against societal expectations. I'm saying that everyone, women and men, are victims of social conditioning. Some people, women and men, will have egalitarian relationships and lifestyles, but they are going against society, and not everyone is informed enough, capable or willing to do that.
Childcare is definitely a female burden, and this unequal burden prevents social progress. Active fatherhood needs to be embraced and supported.
From my own anecdotal experience (so yeah, it means nothing really), your viewpoints are "aged" in that they were more relevant in past generations. Howeverm stats still support them because the stats themselves are outdated don't reflect current conditions.
I know not one childless couple under 40 where both aren't income earners. I know several couples where the decision to whom the stay-at-home caregiver was based on current income and prospects for career advancement, rather than societal expectations. And the decision for a stay-at-home role at all is almost always based on the fact that it's cheaper, in many instances, than paying for daycare.
I think young couples are generally finding that it isn't economically feasible to support societal norms of generations past. Our dollar doesn't buy us as much as it use to, requiring almost everyone to work. By themselves, I think these "forced" changes have ushered a substantial trend towards more complete equality, not to mention any conscious efforts made by members of society in general.
As older generations retire and/or die, we'll see that this change really has made its way in to widespread societal acceptance, as far as the lower and middle classes are concerned.