Unless you want to argue that blacks and women are subservient to white males and do not count when you quote ANY of the Bill of Rights, then I would say that their rights were implicitly guaranteed when ever the framers put the words "the people" in each and every amendment.
Now, we can sit here and have a semantical argument all day about whether or not the intent was to cover blacks (which were explicitly granted freedom under the 13th Amendment) or women (who still don't have any rights other than voting if you take your literal translation as gospel because the ERA has never been ratified) but the point is, you are being melodramatic in thinking that your plight has suffered more than any other.
Now to get to the point. Blacks were granted rights with the 14th amendment (I think). Black suffrage. Since then groups have been fighting to restore or uphold their rights.
And groups have been fighting to curtail those EXPLICIT rights. Ever heard of the Ku Klux Klan?
Again, since your so blinded by black....
The 2nd Amendment is the only one where groups are working to take it away. How many groups do you see working to take away blacks rights? or womens rights? or your right to free speech?
I see quite a bit actually. See the KKK reference above. Also, see above commentary. Women have no rights other than suffrage if you take the Constitution literally.
And there are plenty of groups actively working to limit free speech. In fact, the most important group, the Executive branch of the United States has deemed I do not have the right to protest in their presence despite the first amendment stating:
the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
If we take your literal translation again....how can I petition them if they won't acknowledge that I exist by placing me out of sight and out of mind?
How far did those measures go? Has Moveon been censored or shut down? Where are these different set of rules for freedom of speech?
But if you want to get nitty gritty, maybe the other rights should be regulated like the 2nd. Then you could get a taste of your own medicine. Personally, I love it when someone wants to restrict a right outside the 2nd, because I love seeing everyone get the panties in a wad. "Oh noes, I cant say I'm going to blow up Federal buildings!'. But these same people are more then willing to pack the 2nd up in a crate and ship it away.
Wheres your clue? Apparently I have 2, I can sell you one if you need.
They went pretty far. For the Congress of the United State to even be talking about a political ad on the floor of the house or senate is appalling. For them to write letter to Clear Channel about Rush's idiotic statements is equally appalling. Both Moveon and Rush have every right as guaranteed by the first amendment to make asses out of themselves and I wouldn't have it any other way.
The American people respect the fact that there are limits to free speech (yelling fire, threatening the President, making a joke about anything at an airport, etc). We know that there is responsibility in having freedoms. Unfortunately for the rest of you, idiots like yourself are so consumed with your self pity that you can't make the same concessions.
We accept that, if we speak in a manner that is outside of the boundaries that we are responsible. Are you willing to do the same? Gun companies sure aren't willing to accept any responsibility for the use of their product. Are you willing to accept that any weapon of yours used in a crime will result in YOUR prosecution as well as whomever used it? You can't have it both ways.
Also, I think that you need to try to return those two clues that you have. They are as defective as your perspective of reality.