He didn't lie if he thinks it's true, and many of the people calling him a liar also acknowledge that he "saw something on fox news and went with it." Do words mean anything to the regressive left? Has homer ever made a thread without a faulty title? Something like 70% of thread titles are poorly worded here. Bigots.
Either he is a liar or he is easily misled. Or both.
He didn't lie if he thinks it's true, and many of the people calling him a liar also acknowledge that he "saw something on fox news and went with it." Do words mean anything to the regressive left? Has homer ever made a thread without a faulty title? Something like 70% of thread titles are poorly worded here. Bigots.
He didn't lie if he thinks it's true, and many of the people calling him a liar also acknowledge that he "saw something on fox news and went with it." Do words mean anything to the regressive left? Has homer ever made a thread without a faulty title? Something like 70% of thread titles are poorly worded here. Bigots.
He didn't lie if he thinks it's true, and many of the people calling him a liar also acknowledge that he "saw something on fox news and went with it." Do words mean anything to the regressive left? Has homer ever made a thread without a faulty title? Something like 70% of thread titles are poorly worded here. Bigots.
Oh look another alt right dumbass. Sorry you outed yourself with the regressive left bit. If the thread titles here really having you clutching your pearls so tightly you do have options like not visiting the forum so you won't be so offended.
You are a funny dude, however a bit demented. If there is an error in the title factually refute it. I'm all for being corrected on that basis. The funny part is you bitching about my English skills. Ok so they suck. Using that to refute the content is pretty grade school. Kind of like our current POTUS.He didn't lie if he thinks it's true, and many of the people calling him a liar also acknowledge that he "saw something on fox news and went with it." Do words mean anything to the regressive left? Has homer ever made a thread without a faulty title? Something like 70% of thread titles are poorly worded here. Bigots.
It's kind of a good point though. If you believe and repeat something that only a person of such extreme stupidity that they shouldn't be allowed to attempt tying their own shoes would believe, are you a liar or just so unbelievably fucking stupid that anyone who voted for you should be so ashamed of themselves that they begin brutal self flagellation in repentance immediately?I like that people defending Trump are reduced to the George Costanza defense.
You are a funny dude, however a bit demented. If there is an error in the title factually refute it. I'm all for being corrected on that basis. The funny part is you bitching about my English skills. Ok so they suck. Using that to refute the content is pretty grade school. Kind of like our current POTUS.
When you already know the answer to a question, search for a single crumb to justify the conclusion you want, that is de facto lying. Trump used Fox News claiming Obama used the Brits to spy on him. Oh, in case you didn't see it Spicer and McMaster were forced to call the Brits about this and their response is he's a bloody liar.
Fox News runs a story that's totally FALSE but people want to beat up Rachel Maddow for over hyping a TRUE story. BTW - Fox spreads false stories and over hypes regularly to further their agenda and are rarely called on it.
So where are you going to go now? Every source Trump has used says he is full of shit. Are you willing to admit this guy is a serial liar? Are you willing to admit he should not be in office?
If you go back and look you can find Fern making very similar and equally bizarrely credulous defenses of birtherism.
Dude, be accurate. I never stated you said he should be in office.
When have I ever stated that I thought he should be in office? More lies!
The Brits are not amused.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/17/politics/gchq-trump-wiretap-denial/index.html
No offense, but I prefer not to talk about politics or religion.Dude, be accurate. I never stated you said he should be in office.
I'm asking you in your opinion should he be in office? Is he fit for office? Does the US deserve this guy?
Also is he a serial liar?
If you don't have the courage to answer these questions just say so.
No offense, but I prefer not to talk about politics or religion.
Actually you like to drop a deuce and run. Have a nice day and try taking off the chicken suit.No offense, but I prefer not to talk about politics or religion.
Tough crowd. I don't think he should be president. I think the us probably does deserve him, and I don't know about the serial liar part. He's a serial stater of falsehoods.Actually you like to drop a deuce and run. Have a nice day and try taking off the chicken suit.
I do not believe that to be correct.
The concern about lying should be directed at the intel community, not the Congressional committee. I recall Clapper lying to Congress not too long ago. We've also seen felony level leaks coming frtom the intel community lately.
Homer, this is a very very poor description. I didn't hear Spicer speak, but I know enough about it to know what you posted is inaccurate.
I'll explain:
1. We know, we don't think we know, we know that our intel community is "wire tapping" everyone. We know because of Snowden's leaks published by wikileaks. Clapper initially denied it in his Congressional testimony and had to later admit his testimony was inaccurate.
2 The data is stored in the NSA's facility in Utah. US intel agencies are not supposed to access that data on a US citizen without a court order (some in the intel community have said that is not always the case, but we'll ignore that for now).
3. The GCHQ, a British top level intel agency has been given the right to access our intel data held at the Utah facility. Being a non-US agency the GCHQ is not bound by the rules (or Constitution) our US intel agencies are subject to. (A loophole and a method of acquiring private without leaving fingerprints.)
So, what has been reported, and what Spicer is referring to, are reports that several sources (3 independent sources IIRC) in the intel community have claimed that the British GCHQ went into the Utah database, accessed Trump's info and leaked it thereby circumventing the process.
-----------------------------------
I don't know what, if anything, Trump has, but I'd keep "my powder dry" for while on this one. I'd wait to see what he has. If the Congressional committees all come back saying there's nothing and Trump actually has something, there's going to be a shit storm of epic proportions.
Many say Trump should use his exec authority to find out if he's been 'wire tapped'. But if he actually has something, I think this is a much more clever way of going about it. He's setting up 'traps'.
-----------------------------------
I think everyone's rage is misdirected. Instead, we should be angry about:
1. Wholesale data harvesting of American's private info in direct violation of the 4th. (See Snowden's leaks. IIRC, he claims a paper from a WH lawyer in Nov 2011 re-interpreted policy expanding data collection to all US citizens.).
2. Allowing a foreign gov (British GCHQ) acess to the private data of US citizens. Outrageous if true.
3. The leak of Flynn's convo with the Russian ambassador. You all slammed Trump for not properly vetting Flynn before the appointment. Yet as part of the process Flynn was vetted by the FBI before being confirmed. So, the FBI missed it too, right? How is it this wasn't uncovered by the FBI? Who later leaked it and why?
Things aren't kosher in our intel community now.
Fern
Occam's Razor. Either your vast global conspiracy theory is true, or Trump twitted out something completely bogus that he read on infowars. Hmmm.
Next Dems in Congress need to demand a formal apology from Trump to Obama for accusing him of a felony. I'm already assuming Republicans don't have the balls but I may be wrong.And the US just formally apologized to the UK for falsely alleging part of his conspiracy theory.
It's amazing how some people never learn.
Next Dems in Congress need to demand a formal apology from Trump to Obama for accusing him of a felony. I'm already assuming Republicans don't have the balls but I may be wrong.