Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: sandorski
Never read it, haven't even heard of it. Doesn't matter, DDT is too destructive to use period.
This is what I've read and heard. It has a very long half-life, and accumulates in the food chain. The onus would be on proponents to demonstrate this substance's safety.
It doesn't quite work like that. He made the claim that it was too hazardous to use, thus the onus is on him.
Yes, it does work like that. If you want to market a product, then YOU prove that it is safe at recommended concentrations.
I'm not marketing ANYTHING. He's making a claim, and I'm asking him to back it up with proof. Sheesh.