IVB-E Core i7-4930K Review

[Dave3000]

I might sell my 3930k and buy the 4820k. I know the 4820k is a quad core but it's 3.7GHz and the 3930k is 3.2GHz. I'm mostly a gamer and I feel that 4 cores at 3.7GHz would be better for me than 6 cores at 3.2GHz, plus the little higher IPC of the IB-E. Also I think I would benefit more from a 4820k than a 4930k, as for my purposes I think that 4 cores at 3.7GHz would be better than 6 cores at 3.4GHz.

 

[Gillbot]

Going from a 4770k to a 3930k was a breath of fresh air for me... Haswell is a very frustrating platform for overclocking and keeping temps down.

How is the 3930k treating you?

I might sell my 3930k and buy the 4820k. I know the 4820k is a quad core but it's 3.7GHz and the 3930k is 3.2GHz. I'm mostly a gamer and I feel that 4 cores at 3.7GHz would be better for me than 6 cores at 3.2GHz, plus the little higher IPC of the IB-E. Also I think I would benefit more from a 4820k than a 4930k, as for my purposes I think that 4 cores at 3.7GHz would be better than 6 cores at 3.4GHz.

personally, i'd keep the 3930k and wait for more reviews before I made a decision like that.

 

[Enigmoid]

I might sell my 3930k and buy the 4820k. I know the 4820k is a quad core but it's 3.7GHz and the 3930k is 3.2GHz. I'm mostly a gamer and I feel that 4 cores at 3.7GHz would be better for me than 6 cores at 3.2GHz, plus the little higher IPC of the IB-E. Also I think I would benefit more from a 4820k than a 4930k, as for my purposes I think that 4 cores at 3.7GHz would be better than 6 cores at 3.4GHz.

O/C?

 

[utmode]

So are we getting new chipset x89?

 

[crashtech]

So are we getting new chipset x89?

Nope.

 

[RaistlinZ]

I might sell my 3930k and buy the 4820k. I know the 4820k is a quad core but it's 3.7GHz and the 3930k is 3.2GHz. I'm mostly a gamer and I feel that 4 cores at 3.7GHz would be better for me than 6 cores at 3.2GHz, plus the little higher IPC of the IB-E. Also I think I would benefit more from a 4820k than a 4930k, as for my purposes I think that 4 cores at 3.7GHz would be better than 6 cores at 3.4GHz.

You buy K series CPU's but you don't overclock?


http://www.yourenotsmashing.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/girls_laughing.jpg

Don't abuse the inline image function.
-ViRGE

 

[JimmiG]

I might sell my 3930k and buy the 4820k. I know the 4820k is a quad core but it's 3.7GHz and the 3930k is 3.2GHz. I'm mostly a gamer and I feel that 4 cores at 3.7GHz would be better for me than 6 cores at 3.2GHz, plus the little higher IPC of the IB-E. Also I think I would benefit more from a 4820k than a 4930k, as for my purposes I think that 4 cores at 3.7GHz would be better than 6 cores at 3.4GHz.

You can overclock your 3930K to 3.7 GHz in about 2.5 seconds. You probably don't have to change anything except the multiplier.

 

[moonbogg]

If it will do 4.8 with my H80 at reasonable temps, i'll grab it.

 

[Rvenger]

Well for the cost of a 3930K you can buy two 4770K's and you get two chances to delid without mesing up One is bound to be at least a semi-decent overclocker...

What about if you get the 3930k for the cost of a 4770k?

 

[Gillbot]

You buy K series CPU's but you don't overclock?


[]http://www.yourenotsmashing.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/girls_laughing.jpg[/IMG]

I don't

What about if you get the 3930k for the cost of a 4770k?

or less..... :whiste:

 

[JimmiG]

What about if you get the 3930k for the cost of a 4770k?

I don't plan on running more than one GPU, so the improvements with the Z87 chipset would be more important for me than more PCI-E lanes. Combine that with the IPC improvements of Haswell and the choice would be pretty easy.

Since I play quite a bit of FSX, single-threaded performance is important. When several CPUs were compared at 4.0 GHz, it was found that Haswell had a 17% advantage over IB-E
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/5e3i3psultj2rfa/FSXmarkCPU results.jpg

This means it would take a 5 GHz SB-E to match even a 4.3 GHz Haswell in this particular application.

 

[toyota]

I don't plan on running more than one GPU, so the improvements with the Z87 chipset would be more important for me than more PCI-E lanes. Combine that with the IPC improvements of Haswell and the choice would be pretty easy.

Since I play quite a bit of FSX, single-threaded performance is important. When several CPUs were compared at 4.0 GHz, it was found that Haswell had a 17% advantage over IB-E
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/5e3i3psultj2rfa/FSXmarkCPU results.jpg

This means it would take a 5 GHz SB-E to match even a 4.3 GHz Haswell in this particular application.

you need to look at that again as the Haswell i7 is 11% faster than the Ivy i7.

 

[crashtech]

Within a given cooling method, an OCed Haswell is the single-threaded king, there can be little dispute.

 

[JDG1980]

I'm looking forward to the Xeon version (which will probably be called the E5-1650 v2). In my opinion, if you're going to buy an expensive workstation CPU and board, you might as well get one that supports ECC RAM.

 

[tweakboy]

For the 15MB L3 Cache 4960x their 1k chip. I want that 4960x . What voltage would I need for 4.8Ghz Im trying to imagine things in my head as soon I will be getting the 4960x.

anyhow..

 

[guskline]

Going from a 4770k to a 3930k was a breath of fresh air for me... Haswell is a very frustrating platform for overclocking and keeping temps down.

I thought you sold your 3930k or did you get another one? The one I bought from Gilbot is really an impressive chip. At stock the 3930k is powerful. I'm trying to decide if I want to OC it and to what degree. See rig 2 below for the specs.

 

[Gillbot]

I thought you sold your 3930k or did you get another one? The one I bought from Gilbot is really an impressive chip. At stock the 3930k is powerful. I'm trying to decide if I want to OC it and to what degree. See rig 2 below for the specs.

He went back to a 4770k as far as I know. He couldn't handle a 3930k....