Guys you are really over thinking how to take a plane down with an AR-15.
You simply sneak onto the plane and shoot everyone from the inside. :awe:
You simply sneak onto the plane and shoot everyone from the inside. :awe:
Seems to me that JJ is just trying to remain relevant.
What a maniac. People who don't understand the first thing about what they are trying to regulate should clearly have no say in the matter.
There goes EVERY liberal.................
I read that most modern airliners can in fact be landed by a non-pilot crew member or even a passenger rather easily. They basically have an "auto-pilot landing" button or some crap in which a computer lands the plane.
Em no. Pilots are there for taking off and landing. Once they hit 35000 its autopilot all the till final approach or something goes wrong. And no anyone can't land it as Air France 337 was a perfectly good plane flown into the ocean by experienced pilots. A normal passenger has no hope.
a passenger pilot is better than no pilot at all though, right?
This thread is about guns not WMD. Go troll elsewhere.Regardless if these guns could take down a plane, weapons of mass murder capable of killing hundreds a minute do not belong in ordinary people's hands.
Seems to me that JJ is just trying to remain relevant.
This is getting off from the original topic however ...Em no. Pilots are there for taking off and landing. Once they hit 35000 its autopilot all the till final approach or something goes wrong. And no anyone can't land it as Air France 337 was a perfectly good plane flown into the ocean by experienced pilots. A normal passenger has no hope.
This thread is about guns not WMD. Go troll elsewhere.
Regardless if these guns could take down a plane, weapons of mass murder capable of killing hundreds a minute do not belong in ordinary people's hands.
A few rounds into the cockpit at takeoff or landing would almost certainly have a detrimental effect as well.
The critical points for it to be detrimental would be right at the point of takeoff or landing if ya get both pilots. Keeping in mind you have to hit a human that will be moving past you at between 150 and 200 miles per hour. Good luck with that.
You are quite correct. A military weapon like the Phalanx CIWS should not be in civilian hands.
AR15? I am not sure you could get up to hundreds a minute even if the people were standing there like lemmings with fire rate, magazine reloads and sweep times. That would be assuming 100% accuracy / kill shots. IE not reality at all.
Antigun people should be forced to actually shoot these guns before they make these grandiose claims.
Dipshit at Sandy Hook did well enough.
THough I do agree gun haters should be forced to deal with that which they seek to ban.
As sad as the incident is, 27 people over 14 minutes is not "hundreds of people a minute."
-Following comments are based on if the media reports are true-
The incident is also the reason we need to enforce the existing laws such as not allowing the mentally unstable access to them. It was reported that Adam was diagnosed ASD and possibly autistic. ASD's tendency towards intense interest and Autisim's potential to disconnect the person from their actions (ie lack of feeling or remorse) is a bad combination of ailments to hand a weapon to.
It was stated that he was denied purchase of firearms (I am not sure on this.) So he then shot his mother and stole all of her weapons and went a rampage.
My understanding is the legal side of the incident worked. Adam then chose to kill his mother and steal hers.
At best I could see this as "failure to secure / properly store" but the person who would be charged with that was killed by the thief.
-Posted here because I am not uncaring, but I hate seeing small children being paraded around as the reason for control. Reality is a criminal killed a person and store those weapons and proceeded to commit more crimes.-
I never said it was hundred of people a minute. I said he did well enough.
Thank you, good day.
I never said it was hundred of people a minute. I said he did well enough.
Much as it bothers me its actually a solid argument against civilians owning assault rifles.
UNRELATED TOPIC: fuck you if all you do is argue over the definition of assault rifle. People are dying you ignorant stupid selfish cocksuckers.
Thank you, good day.
I never said it was hundred of people a minute. I said he did well enough.
Much as it bothers me its actually a solid argument against civilians owning assault rifles.
UNRELATED TOPIC: fuck you if all you do is argue over the definition of assault rifle. People are dying you ignorant stupid selfish cocksuckers.
Thank you, good day.