SketchMaster
Diamond Member
- Feb 23, 2005
- 3,100
- 149
- 116
I'm trying to think of ANY possible mathematical trickery could arrive at that conclusion... and my -- perhaps too feeble -- mind can't think of anything at all.
I can only imagine that they mixed up units of measurement and saw numbers that were far too comparable to be remotely correct, but a truly feeble mind must have not given a single fuck about any kind of mental work.
I'm trying to think of ANY possible mathematical trickery could arrive at that conclusion... and my -- perhaps too feeble -- mind can't think of anything at all.
I can only imagine that they mixed up units of measurement and saw numbers that were far too comparable to be remotely correct, but a truly feeble mind must have not given a single fuck about any kind of mental work.
I assumed a logarithmic scale. (Earth is like 1*10^8 meters, Atoms are like 1*10^-10. But the halfway point would still give you a dust particle the size of your fist.)
it's something like 'a speck of dust is a quintillion times larger than a single atom and the earth is a quintillion times larger than a speck of dust'
An atom is the same size relative to a speck of dust as a speck of dust is relative to the Earth? I don't know if that's true, but it seems plausible that that's what it's trying to say.I'm trying to think of ANY possible mathematical trickery could arrive at that conclusion... and my -- perhaps too feeble -- mind can't think of anything at all.
I can only imagine that they mixed up units of measurement and saw numbers that were far too comparable to be remotely correct, but a truly feeble mind must have not given a single fuck about any kind of mental work.
No arm, and it's less disarming when armed with an armorial shield of an armlet.Fake baby and is that a prosthetic arm?
Wonder what the story is.
Lol great
Russian attack fish. Wonder if they cooked it up?