I don't claim AMD's supply issues are purely as a result of the mining craze, but it is a mitigating factor.
Huh? I believe you've said exactly the opposite of what you actually mean.
I don't claim AMD's supply issues are purely as a result of the mining craze, but it is a mitigating factor.
Is that just a hunch or is that stated somewhere?
Huh? I believe you've said exactly the opposite of what you actually mean.
Huh? I believe you've said exactly the opposite of what you actually mean.
You mean all that crazy mining demand didn't do squat?
Ok, then "mitigate" doesn't mean what you think it means
Think people are getting far to carried away with mining which is a recent thing pretty well focused on NA only. AMD mostly lost out because their mobile solutions aren't up to scratch. Their architecture isn't power efficient enough and their drivers don't work well enough. As mobile sales > desktop sales that's very important.
It's a real problem for AMD going forward as their current solution has been to release cards with even higher power requirements. You can get away with that in high end desktop but it's a dead end for laptops - they can't even compete well with Kepler, let alone Maxwell.
How is AMD enduro this days? I feel like this could be one of the major reasons their mobile market share is tanking
That's part of the reason, the other reason is that generally AMD has not had compelling mobile parts in terms of performance per watt in years. This applies to both their mobility APUs and their mobile dGPUs - once they cut these parts down for appropriate TDP, the performance is very poor (particularly with their mobility APUs). In terms of mobile dGPUs, they have high performance parts but the performane per watt (which directly affects battery life) has paled in comparison to Kepler mobile designs, which has generally done very well in the mobile market. The bottom line is nobody wants an ultrabook with a mobile dGPU that affects battery life so negatively as to make a 1000$+ purchase worthless.
Can you back this up somehow?That's part of the reason, the other reason is that generally AMD has not had compelling mobile parts in terms of performance per watt in years. This applies to both their mobility APUs and their mobile dGPUs - once they cut these parts down for appropriate TDP, the performance is very poor (particularly with their mobility APUs). In terms of mobile dGPUs, they have high performance parts but the performane per watt (which directly affects battery life) has paled in comparison to Kepler mobile designs, which has generally done very well in the mobile market. The bottom line is nobody wants an ultrabook with a mobile dGPU that affects battery life so negatively as to make a 1000$+ purchase worthless.
Well, I did say "I think" and "I bet" to denote that it was opinion and not fact.
My original comment was how sales of consoles has been pretty demanding, and AMD may not have foreseen such a demand. That could have caused a supply issue, where it meant that PC products could not be produced.
For example, Sony used GDDR5 for their system, this could have caused a lack of supply for the GPUs they make for PCs.
Or, GF is cranking out console chips at a priority over PC chips, as requested by AMD.
It could be multiple issue, and my opinion was posted as a possibility that I felt was likely.
The lowest GM107 is extremely efficient at mining, really nothing close to it.