junior pilot at the helm when Air France jet crashed

brainhulk

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2007
9,418
454
126
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110527/ts_nm/us_france_brazil_crash

The 2009 emergency began with a stall warning two and a half hours into the Rio-Paris flight and nine minutes after the captain had left the cockpit for a routine rest period.

The Airbus A330 jet climbed to 38,000 feet and then began a dramatic three and a half minute descent, rolling from left to right, with the youngest of three pilots handing control to the second most senior pilot one minute before the crash

I wonder if this disaster could have been averted had there been a more experienced pilot at the helm.
 

MotF Bane

No Lifer
Dec 22, 2006
60,865
10
0
"t also said that crew mainly responded to stall warnings by attempting to lift the nose of the plane, without elaborating."

D:
 

Bignate603

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
13,897
1
0
Maybe, it's very hard to tell though. It's sounding more and more like that problem with their pitot tubes is the culprit.
 

Firestorm007

Senior member
Dec 9, 2010
396
1
0
Maybe, it's very hard to tell though. It's sounding more and more like that problem with their pitot tubes is the culprit.
It also said that they didn't know how fast they were going. So, when the stall warning went off, they compensated by lifting the nose. This is what most likey caused them to plummet. It also said that a more experienced pilot would've increased the throttle first before bringing the nose up. It sounds like they were flying to slow and it was too late to correct.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,095
513
126
One of the first things they teach in flight training is how to recover from a stall. Why they were continuing to pitch the nose up after plummetting 38,000 feet is a question that needs to be answered. Training deals with pitot tube failures. Also curious if the engines were running when they hit the water.
 

Kntx

Platinum Member
Dec 11, 2000
2,270
0
71
There were 3 pilots on board. The least experienced likely had tens of thousands of hours flying time. Probably not too much less than the most experienced of the 3. To say he was "junior" is not a correct statement.
 

JTsyo

Lifer
Nov 18, 2007
11,774
919
126
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110527/ts_nm/us_france_brazil_crash



I wonder if this disaster could have been averted had there been a more experienced pilot at the helm.

The Airbus A330 jet climbed to 38,000 feet and then began a dramatic three and a half minute descent, rolling from left to right, with the youngest of three pilots handing control to the second most senior pilot one minute before the crash.

They don't say how experienced the 2nd guy was but doesn't look like he tried pitching down either. If the engines were running, you would think they could get enough speed for lift even at an angle of attack. Guess there could have been some real strong tail wind or something else that lowered lift.
 

ichy

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2006
6,940
8
81
Maybe, it's very hard to tell though. It's sounding more and more like that problem with their pitot tubes is the culprit.

As with almost all such disasters it was a combination of failures that would not have been all that serious on their own, but came together in a terrible way.

The bit about the captain not being in the cockpit really isn't a big deal. Anyone who's a first officer on a widebody jet for a major airline has a huge amount of experience and is well trained. Don't forget that the worst disaster in aviation history was caused by one of the most senior captains at KLM.
 

bobdole369

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2004
4,504
2
0
I'm curious about that the initial report suggests that the plane was 15* pitch up. There has got to be some other factor at play here. Frozen pitot tubes might have caused an errant stall warning and perhaps the original action was to pitch down, thus gaining speed and lift. Maybe it went too far or too fast and couldn't be recovered. I really can't wait for the discovery channel special sure to come.
 

Demo24

Diamond Member
Aug 5, 2004
8,357
9
81
Article on Reuters said that it was falling some 10,000ft per minute, and at a 15 degree pitch it was too steep to gain lift. That must have been terrifying.
 
Last edited:

DCal430

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2011
6,020
9
81
I wonder if the passengers knew what was going on. If during those 3 minutes if they could tell the plane was plunging to the ocean, with minutes left to live.
 

brainhulk

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2007
9,418
454
126
i guess they forgot to verify the pitot tube speed against what the tom tom gps showed
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,862
84
91
from all the natural geographic air crash eps i've watched no...it seems they divide tasks. one should trouble shoot while the other deals with physical flying, so it is hard to say if it would be better if the junior officers were doing the trouble shooting rather than flying.
 

D1gger

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2004
5,411
2
76
The report said that four hours and 10 minutes into the flight: "The autopilot [and] then [the] auto-thrust disengaged," and co-pilot PF said: "I have the controls." The report said the stall warning sounded twice in a row.
At four hours and 10 minutes into the flight the other co-pilot, referred to as PNF said: "So, we've lost the speeds." A second later the stall warnings sounded again the report said.
At about this time, "The speed displayed on the left side increased sharply," the report said. The aircraft was then at an altitude of about 37,500 ft.
The report said that at this time co-pilot PNF tried several times to call the captain back to the cockpit.
The aircraft then climbed to 38,000 ft and at around four hours 11 minutes and 40 seconds into the flight, the captain re-entered the cockpit. During the following seconds all of the recorded speeds became invalid and the stall warning stopped, the report said.
Co-pilot PF said "I don't have any more indications", and the co-pilot PNF said "we have no valid indications."
About a minute later co-pilot the PF said "We're going to arrive at level one hundred." This is a height of 10,000ft. About fifteen seconds later, the data recorder indicate "simultaneous inputs by both pilots on the sidesticks."
The recordings stopped at four hours 14 minutes and 28 seconds into the flight.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/americas/05/27/air.france.447.crash/index.html?hpt=T1

It looks like the captain was there pretty quickly (within 1m 40sec) after the incident started, but it may have been too late by then for him to assess the situation and offer any help.

4 1/2 minutes from first indication of a problem to hitting the water wouldn't give anyone much time to figure it out, especially as it seems they guessed wrong on their first assessment and pulled the nose up instead of down.
 

sunzt

Diamond Member
Nov 27, 2003
3,076
3
81
Captain: Hey Lt, you take over while i go bang the stewardess(es). Let the Lt know if you need anything.
Lieut: Hey Jr, you take over while I go get some scotch and chill in first class. Let me know if you need assistance.
Captain & Lieut: AND DON"T CRASH THE PLANE
Jr: .....
 

fire hazard

Member
Jan 17, 2011
49
0
61
That must be terrifying to be on a plane that's about to crash

Reminds me of something that happened to my cousin. True story. He was on a plane to New Mexico when all of the sudden the hydraulics went. The plane started spinning around, going out of control. So he decides it's all over and whips it out and starts beating it right there. So all the other passengers take a cue from him and they start whipping it out and beating like mad. So all the passengers are beating off, plummeting to their certain doom, when all of the sudden, the hydraulics kick back in, and the plane rights itself. It lands safely and everyone puts their pieces or, whatever you know, away and deboard. Nobody mentions the phenomenon to anyone else.
 

Snapster

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2001
3,917
0
0
As with almost all such disasters it was a combination of failures that would not have been all that serious on their own, but came together in a terrible way.

The bit about the captain not being in the cockpit really isn't a big deal. Anyone who's a first officer on a widebody jet for a major airline has a huge amount of experience and is well trained. Don't forget that the worst disaster in aviation history was caused by one of the most senior captains at KLM.

Captains generally don't fly the planes nowadays anyway, they are merely the most experienced of observers whilst the first officer does the flying and only take command when / if the situation requires so.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,095
513
126
Reminds me of something that happened to my cousin. True story. He was on a plane to New Mexico when all of the sudden the hydraulics went. The plane started spinning around, going out of control. So he decides it's all over and whips it out and starts beating it right there. So all the other passengers take a cue from him and they start whipping it out and beating like mad. So all the passengers are beating off, plummeting to their certain doom, when all of the sudden, the hydraulics kick back in, and the plane rights itself. It lands safely and everyone puts their pieces or, whatever you know, away and deboard. Nobody mentions the phenomenon to anyone else.

ok Brodie
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
It also said that they didn't know how fast they were going. So, when the stall warning went off, they compensated by lifting the nose. This is what most likey caused them to plummet. It also said that a more experienced pilot would've increased the throttle first before bringing the nose up. It sounds like they were flying to slow and it was too late to correct.

I would have thought an experienced pilot would have dipped the nose to begin descent and set power to recommended levels as advised for loss of instruments.

The threshold between too fast rip wings off and too slow stall for some airliners is incredibly narrow when they are cruising at high altitude. You start getting bad data and trying to respond to it and you're going to be in a world of shit real fast.
 
Last edited:

ichy

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2006
6,940
8
81
Captains generally don't fly the planes nowadays anyway, they are merely the most experienced of observers whilst the first officer does the flying and only take command when / if the situation requires so.

Incorrect. The captain generally does either the take-off or landing, and then the F/O does the other.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |