- Apr 3, 2008
- 1,911
- 9
- 81
Nice bike! Congrats!
Is that the R1200R or the R1150R? A friend of mine had the R1150R and he let me ride it a couple times. Very nice bike but a little too heavy for my tastes.
It's an '04 R1150R ABS. With 10k miles on it, and a pretty comprehensive service history.
Wish it came with a windshield, but that's an easy add-on.
Is that the correct headlight for that bike?
What the fudge? You got conned, that's obviously a Porsche and/or Subaru motorcycle.
Also...yeah...what the eff is up with that front suspension? The center coilover controls the movement of the lower legs there? The forks don't look big enough to have any real hardware of their own inside...that's a wonky setup.
What the fudge? You got conned, that's obviously a Porsche and/or Subaru motorcycle.
Also...yeah...what the eff is up with that front suspension? The center coilover controls the movement of the lower legs there? The forks don't look big enough to have any real hardware of their own inside...that's a wonky setup.
Almost all "classicish" bmw bikes are flat twins..
The front (and rear, for that matter) BMW suspension eliminates front end dive. Some of the first designs made it feel like the front lifts a bit when braking hard. I really didn't care for the feel, but it helped braking performance significantly.
Almost all "classicish" bmw bikes are flat twins..
The front (and rear, for that matter) BMW suspension eliminates front end dive. Some of the first designs made it feel like the front lifts a bit when braking hard. I really didn't care for the feel, but it helped braking performance significantly.
That's different from the diagrams I'm finding of Telelever. What you posted is what I THOUGHT BMW bikes had
great bike sat! Whats the first long trip planned>?
Enjoy your piece of crap unreliable heap, douche!
My mom had a BMW bike and it sucked, I had to vacuum the headlights and bits of light from the headlights just came right off!
I was gonna say, that suspension doesn't match the description...the photo with the fat fork, that is. That looks essentially the same as 'double wishbone' on a car. Or SLA...just no need for a long arm since you want the rake (translate that to a car and that's a hell of a lot of negative camber ).
The BMW thing is indeed basically mimicking the change that makes a Macpherson strut suspension what it is...telescoping replaces a pivoting upper arm...I can't picture how that helps braking, though. I mean, I'm not saying it doesn't; I just can't quite grasp the physics of that design in my head. There's gott be something to that lack of upper pivot that doesn't allow forward weight transfer to compress the spring...I guess...?
I'm not a bike guy, obviously. I honestly never knew anybody even used a flat twin, especially in that orientation, on a bike. Do those cylinders make a good crashbar? Heh. I was looking at it wondering if snapping a cylinder off is not unheard of...
Oh, I could immediately recognize the design benfits. I mean, it's basically the same advantages as a boxer in a car, except they're probably multiplied a couple times over since the engine seems to constitute a lot more of the total weight in a bike.
Maybe I'm wrong there; I don't feel like trying to look up weights (though I can probably guess pretty close for the car side...~400lb engine for maybe a 2800-3000lb car?).
That bike engine is just an unusual thing to notice if you can only ever recall seeing inline 4 (or 3) and V-twin engines.