That your argument for justifying the consumption of beef was based on false analogies and is therefore unsound. Accordingly, you need a different argument if you wish to rebut the contention in the original post.
Climate change is more like phrenology then.
You guys hold up climate change as a science, infallible data so long as its collected using scientific methods. But there are always a few pseudosciences throughout history. You guys act like because its science its obviously correct. But pseudosciences occur over and over again. Climate science isn't biology or chemistry. Biology and Chemistry aren't even settled. Climate science is the most likely to be remembered as a pseudoscience through a historical lens.
How do you not see that the anti-vax movement is analogous to the climate deniers rather than the consensus? The anti-vax movement was never mainstream or a majority. It was always a minority clinging to dubious "science." For a relatively smart person you can be really fucking dumb sometimes.
Climate change is more like phrenology then.
You guys hold up climate change as a science, infallible data so long as its collected using scientific methods. But there are always a few pseudosciences throughout history. You guys act like because its science its obviously correct. But pseudosciences occur over and over again. Climate science isn't biology or chemistry. Biology and Chemistry aren't even settled. Climate science is the most likely to be remembered as a pseudoscience through a historical lens.
Carbon/greenhouse emissions tax.
Easy peasy.
Its just like church pay your dues and your sins just go away.
Can you give an example of something that you think is pseudoscience other than climate science?
You guys have all the answers but none of the conviction.and yet, those interested in doing anything are the only one's in this thread posting relevant information, suggesting actual solutions, and linking to said solutions.
You are merely standing in the corner with your dick in your hand complaining that no one is doing anything.
Its just like church pay your dues and your sins just go away.
I'm done reproducing so the damage has been done unfortunately. But since you bring up death. The best thing a global warming scare nut could do to help the planet is to jump off a cliff. But of course you don't even have the conviction to stop eating beef so I guess we're all screwed.That is very responsible in the sense that it will more than likely remove you from the genepool and the government dole in an efficient and equitable manner..
good thing is that you don't believe in healthcare, so no one will have to pay to treat your colon cancer which will be a rather quick and painful end; but mercifully cheap for everyone else.
:thumbsup:
You guys have all the answers but none of the conviction.
Carbon/greenhouse emissions tax.
Easy peasy.
I'm rather certain that climate change folks would like to see regulations strengthened against ranchers and farmers to mitigate some of these effects.
I know you're just trying to call people hypocrites, but did you stop for a second to think about why you're doing it? And what you look like when you do it?
We know that methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas but you carnivorous lovlies won't put the fork down to help save the planet. Putting the fork down is one way of tackling the problem.You are conflating accepting the problem with having a solution. I believe the science shows a trend and basic chemistry describes greenhouse warming. That has nothing to do with how we tackle the problem. You are still at the point of acknowledging the problem.
We know that methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas but you carnivorous lovlies won't put the fork down to help save the planet. Putting the fork down is one way of tackling the problem.
Having fun?
Maybe this will make you feel better about saving the planet.
It's nice to see that he can be a pedantic, childish ignoramus on a wide variety of scientific topics that he doesn't understand.
A bit. :sneaky:
Maybe this will make you feel better about saving the planet.
Seriously though, there are things I won't contribute to on the principle alone. An example, after watching a documentary on The Church of Scientology I quit going to Tom Cruise movies. Obviously my little "protest" isn't going to amount to a hill of beans but I cannot support how they treat people and what they do if you leave. I really believe that what they are doing is harmful, so I don't contribute.
This is why I get beef with broccoli at the Chinese place. I don't know who to believe so I just get both.Curious to where they are getting their numbers. Google shows 100 calories of broccoli gives 8g of protein and steak has 14g. Just fact checking random forum posts here. D: