Liberal logic:
Apparently you didn't read the article...you can read, right?
Does insanity run in the family?
Maybe it has some thing to do with the fact that some were illegal, those that weren't support illegal immigration. Ever wonder why so many fly the Mexican flag?For what ever reason I was watching Fox News coverage of the protest and almost without exception every protester they interviewed appeared to be Hispanic or Hispanic decent. You think maybe it has something to do with the Trump campaign hurling racist epithets at your particular heritage. I did not get a sense that these were SJWs or anything of the like.
I said "funding these violent protests"...I thought I was being quite clear, apparently not.Paying for signs,etc. is not funding the actual protesters. Your claim inferred that they were paying the protesters, if that's not what you meant I'm sorry.
Liberal logic:
Trump does have paid trolls all over social media to advertise these riots at his rallies even when there isn't one, so yeah, I would say that this part of his plan.Is Trump's plan is to expose and spread awareness of the stupidity and violent behavior of the protesting liberals and appeal to those who are disgusted by such behavior? Because it appears to be working and even those who aren't for Trump's politics are siding with him now due to the violent left.
What are these riots if not proof that if you don't conform to their dogma you'll get the "muscle" after you like mizzou.
What about what has happened to milo across the country, at DePaul and others?
What about the campuses that have held republican meetings only to be shut down back jack booted thugs?
You don't see conservatives playing that game.
This post pretty much says it all about who you are and where you're coming from.Once again, bullshit. 'Conservatives' talk every single day on various media that liberalism is a mental disorder that should be outlawed, and that liberals are traitors who should be shot, so what's your point?
We all know what you're really fighting for, buddy.
"In 1960, whites were 90 percent of the country. The Census Bureau recently estimated that whites already account for less than two-thirds of the population and will be a minority by 2050. Other estimates put that day much sooner.
One may assume the new majority will not be such compassionate overlords as the white majority has been. If this sort of drastic change were legally imposed on any group other than white Americans, it would be called genocide. Yet whites are called racists merely for mentioning the fact that current immigration law is intentionally designed to reduce their percentage in the population."
Do you really want to get into all the idiocy posted on Twitter?Liberal logic:
No, it says it all about where Trump and his supporters are coming from. That quote is from Ann Coulter.This post pretty much says it all about who you are and where you're coming from.
The DNC own all the thug mob street violence..their funding and fingerprints are all over it.
The DNC own all the thug mob street violence..their funding and fingerprints are all over it.
Trump does have paid trolls all over social media to advertise these riots at his rallies even when there isn't one, so yeah, I would say that this part of his plan.
So you support unfettered Offshoring even with currency manipulation and lack of real free trade and unfettered illegal immigration?No, it says it all about where Trump and his supporters are coming from. That quote is from Ann Coulter.
I'm a capitalist, so I believe in meritocracy and free trade. The Trump campaign is entirely and completely against those ideals.
Violence at rallies is wrong period.
Maybe I'm forgetting something but who is the only candidate that advocated violence?
There was a guy who was swinging, very loud, and then started swinging at the audience, Trump recalled of one apparent protester. And you know what? The audience swung back, and I thought it was very, very appropriate. He was swinging, he was hitting people and the audience hit back. And thats what we need a little bit more of.
Maybe I'm forgetting something but who is the only candidate that advocated violence?
He's encouraging it and instigating it. He can't sell the fear and hope of a race war without presenting a picture of what that race war would look like.
Not if there's a D after your name. Libs are everything they claim to hate.