Just got back from the Trump rally/protest

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
People already have that right. I'm not a Trump supporter and I've not been forced to a word the man has spoken. Voluntarily turning on the TV and hearing Trump (or anyone else) isn't the same as saying "my right not to listen" has been compromised. And you need to grow up if you think you ARE being "forced to listen."
Vic is showing us what his world looks like to him. Hopefully he is young.
 

Thebobo

Lifer
Jun 19, 2006
18,592
7,673
136
Lets incite a riot with violence and flag burning against supporters of a guy trying to enforce a law. Sound judgement right there. Bunch of gimme gimme savages that need to be sent back to where they legally belong or charged and tried in a court of law if they are citizens per the letter of the law.

I cant find any reference to gimme savages, what are they?

I did find this The Savages - Gimme, Gimme Good Loving
 

baydude

Senior member
Sep 13, 2011
814
81
91
But she hasn't been condemning it either, nor has bernie. I don't know why trump isn't throwing that in their face. It'd be poetic justice.

If Trump threw it at their face and Hillary/Bernie condemned the violence and the protests became less violent, it would work against Trump.

He needs to generate an appeal to certain groups. That's the conservative group and the undecided group who finds the liberal's violent protests disgusting. Even those who aren't conservatives and don't agree w/ Trump's politics will be voting Trump solely because of the disgust they feel from what they see during Liberal's violent protests.

These violent liberal protesters are really doing Trump a favor and painting a horrible picture for both Hillary and Bernie, and Trump knows that.
 
Last edited:

flexy

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
8,464
155
106
Your claim that any significant number of people who oppose Trump would vote for him because of protests is nothing but wishful thinking. They are the ones who would understand the protestor's motivation best.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Your claim that any significant number of people who oppose Trump would vote for him because of protests is nothing but wishful thinking. They are the ones who would understand the protestor's motivation best.

I can "understand your motivation" all day long and still be appalled that you act upon it and think it should be forcefully opposed so that hopefully it doesn't recur. And it sure as hell ain't going to make people more likely to support the Democratic candidate.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,415
14,307
136
And your side is saying that not everyone deserves equal enforcement of the law. If you're here illegally you should be deported without question.

Whether our immigration quotas need to be hugely raised to reflect reality and change the immigration mix more towards legal immigration and away from illegal immigration is another discussion altogether.

Anyone who knows my posting history here knows that 10 years ago, my side was the Republicans. As a libertarian, my only disagreements with the conservatives were the Iraq war, the drug war, and certain social issues involving equal rights. But I believed very strongly, and still do, in capitalism and small government. The problem I'm having is that Republicans no longer believe in those values. Oh sure, they'll deny that, but actions speak a lot louder than words.

And BTW, there is no right to equal enforcement of the law. Not because it shouldn't exist, but because it can't exist. Law enforcement is selective by necessity. If 50 cars speed past a cop on the highway, he is only going to be able to ticket one of them. And if millions of people are here in this country illegally, each one of them must receive the equal protection of the law, and the government must adhere to due process in each and every deportation, per the highest law of the land, the Constitution. That's just the way it is, by the law, and that law is not going to be changing, as it protects all of us, not just the illegals.
 
Last edited:

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,415
14,307
136
Vic is showing us what his world looks like to him. Hopefully he is young.
Nope. Quite the opposite, I'm old enough that my eyes are no longer blinded by the lies and hypocrisy of partisanship. You're not going to be able to use the extremism on the left to hide the extremism on the right. If only because the extreme left's candidate won't be on the ballot, but the extreme right's candidate will, and with an R next to his name.
You should be ashamed of that, but I'm fairly confident that you won't.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Anyone who knows my posting history here knows that 10 years ago, my side was the Republicans. As a libertarian, my only disagreements with the conservatives were the Iraq war, the drug war, and certain social issues involving equal rights. But I believed very strongly, and still do, in capitalism and small government. The problem I'm having is that Republicans no longer believe in those values. Oh sure, they'll deny that, but actions speak a lot louder than words.

And BTW, there is no right to equal enforcement of the law. Not because it shouldn't exist, but because it can't exist. Law enforcement is selective by necessity. If 50 cars speed past a cop on the highway, he is only going to be able to ticket one of them. And if millions of people are here in this country illegally, each one of them must receive the equal protection of the law, and the government must adhere to due process in each and every deportation, per the highest law of the land, the Constitution. That's just the way it is, by the law, and that law is not going to be changing, as it protects all of us, not just the illegals.

If you were a Libertarian you wouldn't be even hinting at an implication that the protesters engaging in intimidation and coercion are justified in any way whatsoever no matter what the provocation. And you sure as hell wouldn't trivalize it when it did happen because "it's justified because they were called 'not American''. A Libertarian never ever excuses away the initiation of violence even once for whatever reason. That you would throw away the Non-Aggression Principle core of Libertarianism because someone was called a bad name means like I said in earlier posts just means you need to grow up. Right now you have the maturity of a teenager if that.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,595
7,653
136
Violence at rallies is wrong period.

Trump is proposing an action, crackdown on illegals, that would spark massive violent rebellion. A little blood at protests is nothing compared to him actually attempting to implement his ideas.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
Nope. Quite the opposite, I'm old enough that my eyes are no longer blinded by the lies and hypocrisy of partisanship.
Then I will continue to appeal to your keen sense of "objectivity" in the future.

You're not going to be able to use the extremism on the left to hide the extremism on the right. If only because the extreme left's candidate won't be on the ballot, but the extreme right's candidate will, and with an R next to his name.
You should be ashamed of that, but I'm fairly confident that you won't.
I'm not using extremism on the left to hide the extremism on the right....I'm just challenging your perceptions which I find to be quite interesting.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,415
14,307
136
If Trump threw it at their face and Hillary/Bernie condemned the violence and the protests became less violent, it would work against Trump.

He needs to generate an appeal to certain groups. That's the conservative group and the undecided group who finds the liberal's violent protests disgusting. Even those who aren't conservatives and don't agree w/ Trump's politics will be voting Trump solely because of the disgust they feel from what they see during Liberal's violent protests.

These violent liberal protesters are really doing Trump a favor and painting a horrible picture for both Hillary and Bernie, and Trump knows that.
When is Trump going to denounce his support from white supremacist groups? When is he going to denounce his antisemitic supporters that are attacking Jewish members of the media? When is Trump going to take back any of his many bigoted and misogynistic statements?
Your hope that the extremism on the left will make Trump appeal to voters in the middle isn't going to happen, because Trump is an extremist himself, on the right. Instead, these incidents just strengthen the public perception that he is not a competent leader.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,595
7,653
136
When is Trump going to denounce his support from white supremacist groups? When is he going to denounce his antisemitic supporters that are attacking Jewish members of the media? When is Trump going to take back any of his many bigoted and misogynistic statements?
Your hope that the extremism on the left will make Trump appeal to voters in the middle isn't going to happen, because Trump is an extremist himself, on the right. Instead, these incidents just strengthen the public perception that he is not a competent leader.

Or maybe when both sides are extremist, Trump's BS doesn't stand out as much. Diffusion helps mask the smell of a !@#$ sandwich.
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,113
925
126
Trump is proposing an action, crackdown on illegals, that would spark massive violent rebellion. A little blood at protests is nothing compared to him actually attempting to implement his ideas.

At some point, someone needs to crackdown on illegals. How much longer should we wait and when we do, who is the appropriate president to do it?

No pain, no gain.

It's gonna end up being a mess for whichever president tackles the task, that's for sure.
 

-slash-

Senior member
Jan 21, 2014
361
1
41
no they are not being enforced. if they were being enforced we wouldn't have millions of illegals.

Whoa, dont introduce simple simple simple facts in here, they will just be clouded with lies and redirection.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
110,821
29,575
146
At some point, someone needs to crackdown on illegals. How much longer should we wait and when we do, who is the appropriate president to do it?

No pain, no gain.

It's gonna end up being a mess for whichever president tackles the task, that's for sure.

That whole, "never learning from history" thing that conservatives get all hard for:



When you think about it, those guys were illegals, too. All it takes is for big government to declare you illegal. Now, we get Trump.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,415
14,307
136
If you were a Libertarian you wouldn't be even hinting at an implication that the protesters engaging in intimidation and coercion are justified in any way whatsoever no matter what the provocation. And you sure as hell wouldn't trivalize it when it did happen because "it's justified because they were called 'not American''. A Libertarian never ever excuses away the initiation of violence even once for whatever reason. That you would throw away the Non-Aggression Principle core of Libertarianism because someone was called a bad name means like I said in earlier posts just means you need to grow up. Right now you have the maturity of a teenager if that.
As a libertarian, I also believe in personal responsibility. Which means, in this case, that if you pick a fight with someone, and they take you up on that offer, then you're not a victim.
I'm not saying it's right, just that you're not a victim.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,752
4,562
136
As a liberal, I believe Trump is a blow hard. But that does not in any way compel me to advocate violence.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,415
14,307
136
Trump is proposing an action, crackdown on illegals, that would spark massive violent rebellion. A little blood at protests is nothing compared to him actually attempting to implement his ideas.
Thank you. I don't understand why more people can't see this.
I'm glad that Trump has brought this discussion to the forefront, and I agree that changes need to be made. But his proposals are extreme and would tear this country apart.
 

jackstar7

Lifer
Jun 26, 2009
11,679
1,944
126
Words aren't force and no one needs to accommodate your desire for a "safe space" where you don't need to hear words you disagree with.

Most of us learned by 1st grade how to handle it when someone calls you a bad name. Whether it's a 6 year old teasing by calling you a "poopyhead" or another message board poster saying "you're a traitor" doesn't make a difference. If you can't help but call that "force" then you need to put on your swim diaper and ask Mommy to give you a big hug and tell the scary monsters to go away.

The site already provides the means of a "safe space"... the ignore list. And there it is, the same tactic from 1st grade: ignore.

Thanks for elaborating on my point.
 
Feb 4, 2009
34,703
15,951
136
At some point, someone needs to crackdown on illegals. How much longer should we wait and when we do, who is the appropriate president to do it?

No pain, no gain.

It's gonna end up being a mess for whichever president tackles the task, that's for sure.

I'm all for fining the crap out of employers, I'm fine with auditing them more. I do feel a wall is a waste of time but I'm alright with the idea. From what I've read a wall will cost around 9 billion and 300-500 million a year to maintain and staff. I'll pay some extra taxes for that but I do expect something in return. What would you be willing to give in return for a wall?
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,415
14,307
136
Whoa, dont introduce simple simple simple facts in here, they will just be clouded with lies and redirection.
Yeah, and if only we tried harder to enforce the drug laws, there wouldn't be any illegal drug use either, right?
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,415
14,307
136
I'm all for fining the crap out of employers, I'm fine with auditing them more. I do feel a wall is a waste of time but I'm alright with the idea. From what I've read a wall will cost around 9 billion and 300-500 million a year to maintain and staff. I'll pay some extra taxes for that but I do expect something in return. What would you be willing to give in return for a wall?
Do we really want to give the government the power to control who can and who cannot have a job? How many people have been put on the no fly list by accident?
And for the wall, not only is that a boondoggle of absurd proportions, it is also the very incarnation of tyranny. We do that and we will no longer be a free country.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |