<<
What I find interesting is that you posted this thread Dec/27/2000 at 7:26 PM (according to the time I see at the top of this thread), but you made the statements above, which I'm quoting, on Dec/27/2000 at 2:12PM (also according to the time I saw at the top of that thread. You can click on the link to verify). >>
Actually The time is 2:12am dec 28/2000
And the time's are really pointless because I did the benches way before I posted the scores. Just double checking makeing sure I have Everything setup correctly. To give me the best scores.
Here Is A link thats not deadlike yours.
If I might Quote Myself.
Date Posted: Dec/28/2000 3:26 AM
<<Try these benches on for size
system
Iwill ka266r
1.2ghz @ 133fsb
elsa gladiac geforce 2 32mb
buffalo 256mb DDR pc2100
Sblive
sisoft sandra
memory scores for my system
594/806!!!!!
xbit labs reports
540/704
sharky extreme reports
553/699
Thats a difference of 54/102 thats quite a difference for comparable systems all due to (lower rev boards and non tweaked bios settings)
Then take a look at the diff between the the so called "DDR killer" and my (ali magik)
my scores (ali magik)
594/806
KT133A xbit reports
404/446
thats an astonishing difference of 190/360 thats =47%/80.7% alu/fpu
Now I have to agree the kt133a might be a amd760 killer, but I doght it will even come close to killing the ALI magik chipset.
but who knows maybe I'm "counting my chickens before they hatch".>>