What is this? Some kind of DRM? Do not want. There had better be a good way to disable it, or I'm boycotting.
TrustZone technology, tightly integrated tightly into Cortex™-A processors, extends throughout the system via the AMBA® AXI™ bus and specific TrustZone System IP blocks. This system approach means that it is possible to secure peripherals such as secure memory, crypto blocks, keyboard and screen to ensure they can be protected from software attack.
New business models are emerging, from the capability to pay for, download and view the latest Hollywood blockbuster for a specific period, or the ability to pay bills and manage bank accounts remotely from a handset.
These trends have the potential to make the mobile handset the next frontier for software attack vectors such as malware, trojans and rootkits. However, through the application of advanced security technology based on ARM TrustZone technology and integrating SecurCore™ tamper resistant elements it is possible to develop devices that can offer both a feature-rich open operating environment and robust security solutions.
no doubt kabini will improve over Brazos. I don't doubt that it will double the gpu performance. The question is to what effect?
AMD is pushing the idea of gaming tablets. but with less GPU performance than hd4000 or trinity, will consumers see them that way? Or will they see them as still being the same budget product that Brazos is?
Your right it does look like that model will be slightly slower than a HD 4000 GPU.The graphics test 3DMark 11, GPU 379 or 537 points, depending on whether it is in the surf platte or hybrid mode. That Compares to just over 600 points for the HD 4000 in an Ultrabook.
I think you're confusing turbo dock TDP and benchmarks with the regular Temash. Temash in turbo dock mode of course has a much higher TDP.
Temash Quad core @ 1GHz will be less than 5W TDP.
Temash Quad core @ 1GHz will be less than 5W TDP.
Negative. Listen to Rory Read on various calls...2C Temash is what goes into fanless/tablet form factors. 4C Temash is an 8W part that can boost up to 15W when docked.
Temash APU A6-1450/6W TDP
This is google-translate from swedish to english.Details on the processor, which will carry the banner of Temash platform A6-1450 are also shown. The surf flat position working the four cores of 1.0 GHz while the graphics part is ticking at 300 MHz. As hybrid increased this to 1.4 GHz and 500 MHz. According to previous rumors will Temash have TDP-values ​​of 3.6 and 5.9 watts, and the power consumption of around 1 watt during normal use.
Im kinda warry of these rumors now... I want to see a finished product benchmarked and reviewed.All this Temash hype reminds me of Bulldozer hype.
Shows 4 cores > 2 Cores + HT, in this case.
http://www.sweclockers.com/nyhet/16597-amd-temash-specifikationer-och-prestanda
It looks like the A6-1450 might be a 9watt TPD? unit.
When you put it into a "stand" it gets air cooling from the stand its placed in,
and overclocked from 1ghz -> 1.4ghz.
Your right it does look like that model will be slightly slower than a HD 4000 GPU.
Its cool that the Temash @ 1.4ghz (9w? TPD)
beats the 1.4ghz i3-2367M (17w TPD) Sandy Bridge, in Cinebench.
Shows 4 cores > 2 Cores + HT, in this case.
temash is their tablet chip and while it will be slower(by how much is yet to be seen) it will have much better battery life in comparison to and i5 ulv w/ hd4000. which seems more appealing to customers?
Negative. Listen to Rory Read on various calls...2C Temash is what goes into fanless/tablet form factors. 4C Temash is an 8W part that can boost up to 15W when docked.
Even Dual Core 1GHz @ 40nm Brazos2.0 (Z-60) is less than 5W.
Quad core 1GHz @ 28nm Jaguar (SoC) will be less/equal to 5W.
Even Dual Core 1GHz @ 40nm Brazos2.0 (Z-60) is less than 5W.
Quad core 1GHz @ 28nm Jaguar (SoC) will be less/equal to 5W.
I've only heard 6W and 8W for quad core Jaguar @ 1GHz.
Keeping the same power consumption while having the following:
- Same CPU clock
- Doubling the core count
- ~15% better average IPC
- Twice wide SIMD engines
- More than doubling the GPU performance (although, I still have no idea what the "base" GPU perf will be with all four cores @ 1GHz)
Only from TSMC 40nm to 28nm sounds a little too good to be true. Unless Jaguar made some truly staggering design improvements vs Bobcat, maybe it'd be more fair to call them "corrections" instead.
I call BS.
8W TDP (with 15W in turbo dock) has been reported in multiple articles for 4-core chip.
And considering that the dual-core Temash @ 1 Ghz shows no battery life gains over Brazos 2.0 whatsoever it also makes sense.
And even the earlier rumors put the figure at 5.9 ~ 6W. I haven't seen 5W mentioned anywhere (except someone's bad shill work in forums).
How much would you like to bet that the quad core Jaguar will be <= 5W TDP? I'll put up $50 that it is not...are you game?
Reasonable expectations for power improvement from TSMC 40nm to 28nm (while keeping the same performance) is around 40-50%.
I call BS.
8W TDP (with 15W in turbo dock) has been reported in multiple articles for 4-core chip. And considering that the dual-core Temash @ 1 Ghz shows no battery life gains over Brazos 2.0 whatsoever it also makes sense.
And even the earlier rumors put the figure at 5.9 ~ 6W. I haven't seen 5W mentioned anywhere (except someone's bad shill work in forums).
Where did you see that ??Gideonic said:And considering that the dual-core Temash @ 1 Ghz shows no battery life gains over Brazos 2.0 whatsoever it also makes sense.
On AMDs own site. I wrote a lengthy post about it here:
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?p=34720015&highlight=#post34720015
I was totally shocked about it in a worst possible way. But given AMDs tendency of adhering bad news, that's what I expect from Temash until proven otherwise.