balloonshark
Diamond Member
- Jun 5, 2008
- 6,546
- 3,007
- 136
Will it be on YT?
Edit: I just checked a live stream and did not have a rewind. I was wrong. I'm sure a replay will be available.
Last edited:
Will it be on YT?
Social user’s post showing a photo of Harris with Hillary Clinton captioned, “Funny how blowjobs impacted both their careers differently …”
I'm going to go with the analysis that says this is a movement, not just a campaign, as having good odds of being correct.Seems to be more than a sugar high.
With Democrats "fired up" by Harris' candidacy, young people are now registering to vote in droves
"You just don’t see that sort of thing happen in elections normally,” one expert told CBS Newswww.salon.com
I may force myself to, but probably just see the highlights the next day or 2 on alternate sources. CNN really, has become the BOTHSIDES news org.anyone watching the Harris/Walz interview on goddamn CNN with the moron Dana Bash on tonight?
I'll record and watch the replayI may force myself to, but probably just see the highlights the next day or 2 on alternate sources. CNN really, has become the BOTHSIDES news org.
Oh, that's right it was recorded already.
I think you may be able to rewind but you can't go forward. I'm also sure a replay will be available.
Nate Silver take polls and makes adjustments based on history (in an attempt to correct for known effects like convention bounces and return back to normal). As the election gets closer and closer, the adjustments get smaller and smaller (since the polls get more and more relevant).Apparently Nate Silver put a negative adjustment for Kam after the DNC.. so any polls that were even would be +3 for trump in his model or something which is why his model has gone crazy today. I don't think it's estimated the RFK vote was Trump vote properly anyways.
Trump has never released a detailed policy plan. Yet, the media doesn't put that in every story.
If Donny 'wins', a lot of people are going to have a movement.I'm going to go with the analysis that says this is a movement, not just a campaign, as having good odds of being correct.
I can't believe people are like "Biden isn't doing enough to help Gaza, so I'm going to help elect Trump who would support the complete flattening of Gaza."Even some of the Kopmala/Genocide Joe leftists I know are planning to begrudgingly vote Harris because of the threat posed by Project 2025.
Fuck, former President Clinton was able to stop the limo and walk into random McDonalds fairly frequently.
Problem for Vance is he’s weird. People don’t like to talk to weird mofo’s.
Trump has never released a detailed policy plan. Yet, the media doesn't put that in every story.
Do their records include all of the various franchises?Speaking of McDonalds, Supernews posted on X today that Kamala's lying about having worked there when she was younger. They're claiming McDonald's released a statement saying they have no record of Kamala ever being an employee. This has MAGAs up in arms and apparently, is an inexcusable lie! Meanwhile, they still end their posts with "TRUMP 2024" Would someone lie about working for McDonalds? That seems weird to me, but trying to make this into a story of importance seems extraordinarily petty.
Imagine being a Trump supporter and pretending you care when a candidate lies.Speaking of McDonalds, Supernews posted on X today that Kamala's lying about having worked there when she was younger. They're claiming McDonald's released a statement saying they have no record of Kamala ever being an employee. This has MAGAs up in arms and apparently, is an inexcusable lie! Meanwhile, they still end their posts with "TRUMP 2024" Would someone lie about working for McDonalds? That seems weird to me, but trying to make this into a story of importance seems extraordinarily petty.
McDonalds corporation wouldn't have employment records from the franchises. And I doubt the franchises have employment records from 40 years ago.Speaking of McDonalds, Supernews posted on X today that Kamala's lying about having worked there when she was younger. They're claiming McDonald's released a statement saying they have no record of Kamala ever being an employee. This has MAGAs up in arms and apparently, is an inexcusable lie! Meanwhile, they still end their posts with "TRUMP 2024" Would someone lie about working for McDonalds? That seems weird to me, but trying to make this into a story of importance seems extraordinarily petty.
That's not the only problem.Do their records include all of the various franchises?
After thinking about this a bit, probably the one and only place that would likely have those records of employment from 40 years ago would be the Social Security Administration. So the fake poster should have fabricated the claim to instead have (illegally) gotten proof from the Social Security Administration, rather than making up a story about a non-existent (and blatantly impossible) McDonald's press release.McDonalds corporation wouldn't have employment records from the franchises. And I doubt the franchises have employment records from 40 years ago.
is the franchise owner still in business, do they retain records for over 40 years?McDonalds corporation wouldn't have employment records from the franchises. And I doubt the franchises have employment records from 40 years ago.