Taylor's a decade ahead of the Trump attacks:New Trump/Vance outreach to female voters just dropped
nvm, quoted wrong person, sorry.Well my oldest daughter would want to douse the bag in gasoline and set it on fire outside after she peeled herself off the ceiling.
Great idea. Also find the woman who spread the initial rumor and get her to retract it. She says she regrets all the hate spread about her post but has not completely renounced it.Harris should visit Springfield.
They still won't vote for here there but it would be the Presidential thing to do.
I don't think someone who just failed at the most basic spelling, should be making any suggestions on what is or is not Presidential.Harris should visit Springfield.
They still won't vote for here there but it would be the Presidential thing to do.
Taylor's a decade ahead of the Trump attacks:
That vid of Swift is the first time I’ve knowingly listened to a song of hers, much less a music video. (My pop influences these days are more like Disturbed and Royal Blood.)
First, it was “cute,” second…she’s kinda skinny.
Just another ear worm.
Great idea. Also find the woman who spread the initial rumor and get her to retract it. She says she regrets all the hate spread about her post but has not completely renounced it.
You are looking at a video from a decade ago...That vid of Swift is the first time I’ve knowingly listened to a song of hers, much less a music video. (My pop influences these days are more like Disturbed and Royal Blood.)
First, it was “cute,” second…she’s kinda skinny.
Just another ear worm.
Could it be possible?
Kamala Harris Within Striking Distance of Donald Trump in Iowa—New Poll
The poll shows the Democrat down by just 4 points in a state that Trump handily won in 2016 and 2020.
Oh the irony of you calling anyone out for spelling (that was likely a typo).I don't think someone who just failed at the most basic spelling, should be making any suggestions on what is or is not Presidential.
Possibly yes. Could she lose the election with a final +4 in the actual popular vote? Absolutely. Although if at +4, probably 60-65% chance of winning the election.Selzer poll probably overstating Trump weakness in IA, still not what they want to be seeing though.
Do I believe based on better state polling that Harris is up 3-4 points nationally? Yeah I think so.
Possibly yes. Could she lose the election with a final +4 in the actual popular vote? Absolutely. Although if at +4, probably 60-65% chance of winning the election.
Possibly yes. Could she lose the election with a final +4 in the actual popular vote? Absolutely. Although if at +4, probably 60-65% chance of winning the election.
That's the exact reason Harris should visit Springfield. Get local officials, good meaning local residents original and migrants. Promote peace in the community and denounce the lies and hate promoted by Trump.I doubt this person ever wants to be in the spotlight again, but if your scenario ever happened, I think it would be more powerful for Harris and other community leaders to extend an olive branch to this individual as a way for the town to try to turn the page and move on.
Would provide a blinding stark contrast to Trump and his surrogates.
It is highly statistically correlated actually. Biased in one direction but correlated nonetheless.The popular vote is 100% irrelevant to who wins the Electoral College.
The popular vote is 100% irrelevant to who wins the Electoral College. Anyone pointing at a popular vote poll or total count isn't playing the correct game.
Might as well tally yard signs you see out of the left hand side of your car while driving to work on Thursdays.
Tell that to President Al Gore and President Hillary Clinton.It is highly statistically correlated actually. Biased in one direction but correlated nonetheless.
When I first heard about this I had to wonder if it was real. Baffling.New Trump/Vance outreach to female voters just dropped
While I agree, correlations aren't always 100%. They can be probabilistic.Tell that to President Al Gore and President Hillary Clinton.
Most people don't, or can't, think probabilistically. It should be taught in high school math, perhaps in algebra?While I agree, correlations aren't always 100%. They can be probabilistic.