Karl Rove possibly tried for perjury?

[BBond]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond
Those "tons" of WMDs were destroyed after the first Gulf War. Whether or not they're "accounted for" has little bearing on the FACT THAT THEY DO NOT EXIST.

If they were destroyed why didnt Saddam show us?
To this day there is still nearly 400 tons of Mustard gas missing and a few tons of VX.

Before you come back with your pre-programmed response about PNAC and stolen elections. Take the time to read this and let us know how anybody who has brain activity could have thought Saddam was clean.

http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Chronology/chronologyframe.htm

Clean? Who said anything about clean? I thought the issue was his imminent threat. Wasn't Saddam about to hit us with nuclear war?

And don't forget Saddam's fleet of drone aircraft that were going to spray chemical weapons on us.

:roll:

Dumbest generation ever.

And now they're OK with Bush's brain being a traitor too.

Politics taints probe of CIA leak

Given the stakes, do you really think this administration would let a Justice Department official just pick some highly independent prosecutor to launch a wide ranging probe -- one that could net Novak, a reliable administration toady, and the chummy high officials Novak talks to, say, Rove or Vice President Dick Cheney?

Nor is it an accident that this investigation, rather than fingering whoever inside the administration broke the law by outing Valerie Plame, is instead putting the squeeze on two news organizations that just happen to have been critical of the Bush administration, Time magazine and The New York Times, and by extension the entire press corps.

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond
Those "tons" of WMDs were destroyed after the first Gulf War. Whether or not they're "accounted for" has little bearing on the FACT THAT THEY DO NOT EXIST.

If they were destroyed why didnt Saddam show us?
To this day there is still nearly 400 tons of Mustard gas missing and a few tons of VX.

Before you come back with your pre-programmed response about PNAC and stolen elections. Take the time to read this and let us know how anybody who has brain activity could have thought Saddam was clean.

http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Chronology/chronologyframe.htm

Speaking of brain activity, you do have enough mental function left to realize that THERE ARE NO WMDs, don't you? And that Bush et al fit the evidence to their plans.

Or are you one of those who still believes that Bush invaded Iraq to bring all of those now dead Iraqis freedom and democracy?

I see you didnt bother to read the link and instead resorted to the brainless activity of your pre-programed responses.

.yawn

Just give up already kid. Your leaders are traitors and you refuse to admit it because your world will come tumbling down. You refuse to face the truth because the truth is just too painful for you to face.

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond
Those "tons" of WMDs were destroyed after the first Gulf War. Whether or not they're "accounted for" has little bearing on the FACT THAT THEY DO NOT EXIST.

If they were destroyed why didnt Saddam show us?
To this day there is still nearly 400 tons of Mustard gas missing and a few tons of VX.

Before you come back with your pre-programmed response about PNAC and stolen elections. Take the time to read this and let us know how anybody who has brain activity could have thought Saddam was clean.

http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Chronology/chronologyframe.htm

So..all intelligence gathering stopped in 1999? Well, for all intents and purposes it did. All we had in 2001/2002 was Feith and Chalabi.

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Genx87
Waiting for confirmation like most level headed people usually do.

You on the other hand..............

Like you people waited for comfirmation on Iraq?

:roll:

I waited 12 years and Saddam still wouldnt give us confirmation. Are you willing to wait 12 years on this?

Doubt it as you want jump to conclusion and ASSume things without confirmation.

But good to know you have little problem changing subjects, not like we didnt know this before.

So, invading over paperwork is the justification now?

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond
Those "tons" of WMDs were destroyed after the first Gulf War. Whether or not they're "accounted for" has little bearing on the FACT THAT THEY DO NOT EXIST.

If they were destroyed why didnt Saddam show us?
To this day there is still nearly 400 tons of Mustard gas missing and a few tons of VX.

Before you come back with your pre-programmed response about PNAC and stolen elections. Take the time to read this and let us know how anybody who has brain activity could have thought Saddam was clean.

http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Chronology/chronologyframe.htm

So..all intelligence gathering stopped in 1999? Well, for all intents and purposes it did. All we had in 2001/2002 was Feith and Chalabi.

Not to mention the UN INSPECTORS WHO WERE IN IRAQ TELLING BUSH THERE WAS NO WMD!

 

[Genx87]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond
Those "tons" of WMDs were destroyed after the first Gulf War. Whether or not they're "accounted for" has little bearing on the FACT THAT THEY DO NOT EXIST.

If they were destroyed why didnt Saddam show us?
To this day there is still nearly 400 tons of Mustard gas missing and a few tons of VX.

Before you come back with your pre-programmed response about PNAC and stolen elections. Take the time to read this and let us know how anybody who has brain activity could have thought Saddam was clean.

http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Chronology/chronologyframe.htm

Speaking of brain activity, you do have enough mental function left to realize that THERE ARE NO WMDs, don't you? And that Bush et al fit the evidence to their plans.

Or are you one of those who still believes that Bush invaded Iraq to bring all of those now dead Iraqis freedom and democracy?

I see you didnt bother to read the link and instead resorted to the brainless activity of your pre-programed responses.

.yawn

Just give up already kid. Your leaders are traitors and you refuse to admit it because your world will come tumbling down. You refuse to face the truth because the truth is just too painful for you to face.

Yup yup you should be proud of yourself. You hit every single point in your program.

 

[Genx87]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond
Those "tons" of WMDs were destroyed after the first Gulf War. Whether or not they're "accounted for" has little bearing on the FACT THAT THEY DO NOT EXIST.

If they were destroyed why didnt Saddam show us?
To this day there is still nearly 400 tons of Mustard gas missing and a few tons of VX.

Before you come back with your pre-programmed response about PNAC and stolen elections. Take the time to read this and let us know how anybody who has brain activity could have thought Saddam was clean.

http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Chronology/chronologyframe.htm

So..all intelligence gathering stopped in 1999? Well, for all intents and purposes it did. All we had in 2001/2002 was Feith and Chalabi.

Why do you think it ended in 1999? How many UN inspections took place from Dec of 1998 until late 2002?

 

[Genx87]

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Genx87
Waiting for confirmation like most level headed people usually do.

You on the other hand..............

Like you people waited for comfirmation on Iraq?

:roll:

I waited 12 years and Saddam still wouldnt give us confirmation. Are you willing to wait 12 years on this?

Doubt it as you want jump to conclusion and ASSume things without confirmation.

But good to know you have little problem changing subjects, not like we didnt know this before.

So, invading over paperwork is the justification now?

You dont think ceasefire agreements hold much weight?

 

[outriding]

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond
Those "tons" of WMDs were destroyed after the first Gulf War. Whether or not they're "accounted for" has little bearing on the FACT THAT THEY DO NOT EXIST.

If they were destroyed why didnt Saddam show us?
To this day there is still nearly 400 tons of Mustard gas missing and a few tons of VX.

Before you come back with your pre-programmed response about PNAC and stolen elections. Take the time to read this and let us know how anybody who has brain activity could have thought Saddam was clean.

http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Chronology/chronologyframe.htm

Speaking of brain activity, you do have enough mental function left to realize that THERE ARE NO WMDs, don't you? And that Bush et al fit the evidence to their plans.

Or are you one of those who still believes that Bush invaded Iraq to bring all of those now dead Iraqis freedom and democracy?

I see you didnt bother to read the link and instead resorted to the brainless activity of your pre-programed responses.

.yawn

If Saddam was an imminent threat and there are so much chemicals still missing what was the rational that Bush had when he pulled out the inspectors after the country was "secured" ?

 

[Genx87]

Originally posted by: outriding

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond
Those "tons" of WMDs were destroyed after the first Gulf War. Whether or not they're "accounted for" has little bearing on the FACT THAT THEY DO NOT EXIST.

If they were destroyed why didnt Saddam show us?
To this day there is still nearly 400 tons of Mustard gas missing and a few tons of VX.

Before you come back with your pre-programmed response about PNAC and stolen elections. Take the time to read this and let us know how anybody who has brain activity could have thought Saddam was clean.

http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Chronology/chronologyframe.htm

Speaking of brain activity, you do have enough mental function left to realize that THERE ARE NO WMDs, don't you? And that Bush et al fit the evidence to their plans.

Or are you one of those who still believes that Bush invaded Iraq to bring all of those now dead Iraqis freedom and democracy?

I see you didnt bother to read the link and instead resorted to the brainless activity of your pre-programed responses.

.yawn

If Saddam was an imminent threat and there are so much chemicals still missing what was the rational that Bush had when he pulled out the inspectors after the country was "secured" ?

You will have to ask him.

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Genx87
Waiting for confirmation like most level headed people usually do.

You on the other hand..............

Like you people waited for comfirmation on Iraq?

:roll:

I waited 12 years and Saddam still wouldnt give us confirmation. Are you willing to wait 12 years on this?

Doubt it as you want jump to conclusion and ASSume things without confirmation.

But good to know you have little problem changing subjects, not like we didnt know this before.

So, invading over paperwork is the justification now?

You dont think ceasefire agreements hold much weight?

Saddam wasn't the one who started firing, was he? What forced Bush to invade Iraq on March 19, 2003?

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: Genx87


You will have to ask him.

You just owned yourself.

 

[Whoozyerdaddy]

Geez... I hate to get back on topic here but Cooper just said that he is going to testify in front of the grand jury rather than go to jail. (Fox News 10:25am AST)

Should be interesting.

 

[Genx87]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Genx87
Waiting for confirmation like most level headed people usually do.

You on the other hand..............

Like you people waited for comfirmation on Iraq?

:roll:

I waited 12 years and Saddam still wouldnt give us confirmation. Are you willing to wait 12 years on this?

Doubt it as you want jump to conclusion and ASSume things without confirmation.

But good to know you have little problem changing subjects, not like we didnt know this before.

So, invading over paperwork is the justification now?

You dont think ceasefire agreements hold much weight?

Saddam wasn't the one who started firing, was he? What forced Bush to invade Iraq on March 19, 2003?

Who invaded Kuwait again?

Can anybody help the old fellow out?

 

[NJDevil]

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Geez... I hate to get back on topic here but Cooper just said that he is going to testify in front of the grand jury rather than go to jail. (Fox News 10:25am AST)

Should be interesting.

I don't see the news (looking for it on drudge, cnn, fox) ... or is it only on live tv?

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Genx87
Waiting for confirmation like most level headed people usually do.

You on the other hand..............

Like you people waited for comfirmation on Iraq?

:roll:

I waited 12 years and Saddam still wouldnt give us confirmation. Are you willing to wait 12 years on this?

Doubt it as you want jump to conclusion and ASSume things without confirmation.

But good to know you have little problem changing subjects, not like we didnt know this before.

So, invading over paperwork is the justification now?

You dont think ceasefire agreements hold much weight?

Saddam wasn't the one who started firing, was he? What forced Bush to invade Iraq on March 19, 2003?

Who invaded Kuwait again?

Can anybody help the old fellow out?

So now Bush invaded Iraq because Saddam invaded Kuwait twelve years earlier?

You are now past the point of ridiculous and into heretofore unexplored territory of idiocy.

I just read this at BuzzFlash. Seems to fitting for today's traitor in our midst. Maybe if you read it a few times you can figure this all out. But judging from past experience, I seriously doubt it.

Treason from Within

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS

"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear."

-- Cicero Marcus Tullius, Born on January 3, 106 BC and was murdered on December 7, 43 BC.

 

[shurato]

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: BBond
The chicken is just pi$$ed that his boy is busted.

LOL

So many in here just love to speculate on what I'm thinking. It tells me how much you guys really care and how concerned you must really be about my comments in ATP&N.

:lips:

This is an Internet forum what do you expect? We can only speculate from peoples posts and you ma man are so far off to the right, that you'd fall off and and bust your ass with your lips landing firmly on dubyas buttcheeks. Who are you trying to fool saying your a liberal. You exemplify the typical neo-con. Divert... Obfuscate... Divert.... Obfuscate.... they teach you right wingers a course in that in neo-con 101?

 

[shurato]

Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken

Originally posted by: BBond
The chicken is just pi$$ed that his boy is busted.

LOL

So many in here just love to speculate on what I'm thinking. It tells me how much you guys really care and how concerned you must really be about my comments in ATP&N.

:lips:

No, people don't take kindly to trolls around here.

 

[outriding]

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: conjur

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: Genx87
Waiting for confirmation like most level headed people usually do.

You on the other hand..............

Like you people waited for comfirmation on Iraq?

:roll:

I waited 12 years and Saddam still wouldnt give us confirmation. Are you willing to wait 12 years on this?

Doubt it as you want jump to conclusion and ASSume things without confirmation.

But good to know you have little problem changing subjects, not like we didnt know this before.

So, invading over paperwork is the justification now?

You dont think ceasefire agreements hold much weight?

Saddam wasn't the one who started firing, was he? What forced Bush to invade Iraq on March 19, 2003?

Who invaded Kuwait again?

Can anybody help the old fellow out?

I guess it would the same person who was also forced out of Kuwait.

 

[Whoozyerdaddy]

Originally posted by: NJDevil

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Geez... I hate to get back on topic here but Cooper just said that he is going to testify in front of the grand jury rather than go to jail. (Fox News 10:25am AST)

Should be interesting.

I don't see the news (looking for it on drudge, cnn, fox) ... or is it only on live tv?

Yeah... It was a breaking news thing on TV. Should be on the websites shortly.

 

[Harvey]

BREAKING NEWS -- I just heard a quick announcement on my local NPR station that Matthew Cooper has agreed to testify to the investigators. No link confirmation, yet.

Let the truth be told.

 

[Whoozyerdaddy]

*** More Cooper news ***

Cooper states the reason for changing his mind is that he received a phone call from his source absolving him of his obligation to protect his/her identity.

(Fox News 10:48am AST)

It just keeps getting better and better...

 

[Moonbeam]

It's hard to believe that those reporters feel an obligation to protect a source that used that protection to commit a crime. We have some places in foreign countries where we could get them to testify.

 

[digitalsm]

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy

Originally posted by: NJDevil

Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Geez... I hate to get back on topic here but Cooper just said that he is going to testify in front of the grand jury rather than go to jail. (Fox News 10:25am AST)

Should be interesting.

I don't see the news (looking for it on drudge, cnn, fox) ... or is it only on live tv?

Yeah... It was a breaking news thing on TV. Should be on the websites shortly.

The leaker gave Miller premission to disclose his identity.

 

[Whoozyerdaddy]

Originally posted by: Harvey
BREAKING NEWS -- I just heard a quick announcement on my local NPR station that Matthew Cooper has agreed to testify to the investigators. No link confirmation, yet.

Let the truth be told.

Tee hee... Fox beat you to the scoop.