Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Oh you mean all those posts where you claim I don't know my ass from a hole in the ground and call me TastesLikeChickenSh8 and TastesLikeBullsh8?Originally posted by: Harvey
Hmmm.... Pot meet kettle. :laugh:Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
When will you do more than provide a link and think it proves your claim?
I seem to recall pages and pages of post after post in this very thread when I asked you the same thing and got absolutely no links, let alone anything on topic.
And yes, there is a link and a point to this post. The link is this thread, and all it takes to get the point is enough time to read the thread from the top.
So how is it you get away with so much personal abuse in this forum that would have others banned or warned at the very least, Harvey? Hmmmm? Want to tell us your secret?
:roll:
I am. Even if it is true she was moved back to a permanent station in the U.S. in 1997 -- unproven -- that doesn't remotely suggest she didn't still make "OUTSIDE" trips as part of her job. Your BushCo talking point, while dutifully parroted, is speculative at best (isn't that what you keep attacking everyone else for?) based on the little information you have.Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Please tell me you are not this dense. You posted the answer yourself and had it right in front of you, yet you're still oblivious. Let me help you out, because it's apparent you need it:
A covert agent is defined as someone whose identity is classified AND who has served OUTSIDE the United States within the last five years.
She's been in the US since 1997, 6 years before she was outed by Novak.
Still laughing TC?
Because if she had someone would have already "leaked" that information. The leaks on this case are not one-sided.Originally posted by: conjur
How do you know she hasn't been overseas since?
Prove me wrong instead of wasting two paragaphs huffing and puffing out your chest and acting like a blithering idiot parroting the meme of the left, as you usually do.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
I am. Even if it is true she was moved back to a permanent station in the U.S. in 1997 -- unproven -- that doesn't remotely suggest she didn't still make "OUTSIDE" trips as part of her job. Your BushCo talking point, while dutifully parroted, is speculative at best (isn't that what you keep attacking everyone else for?) based on the little information you have.Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Please tell me you are not this dense. You posted the answer yourself and had it right in front of you, yet you're still oblivious. Let me help you out, because it's apparent you need it:
A covert agent is defined as someone whose identity is classified AND who has served OUTSIDE the United States within the last five years.
She's been in the US since 1997, 6 years before she was outed by Novak.
Still laughing TC?
Further, they just mentioned that very BushCo talking point on the NBC News. NBC reported that officials dismissed that excuse, affirming Plame was, in fact, still considered to be working in a covert role. I assume there will be linkable documentation available soon, offering more detail than NBC's on-air report. Based on the evidence we already have, however, I think we can consider that specific excuse as about to disintegrate ... just like the rest of your official progaganda.
Perhaps the mods see it as justly earned, balancing Chicken's own torrent of gratuitous attacks on others. You know, sort of a karma thing.Originally posted by: Crimson
Harvey doesn't seem to want to answer this..Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
So how is it you get away with so much personal abuse in this forum that would have others banned or warned at the very least, Harvey? Hmmmm? Want to tell us your secret?
:roll:
Claims the guy who gratuitously attacks me virtually every time he replies.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Perhaps the mods see it as justly earned, balancing Chicken's own torrent of gratuitous attacks on others. You know, sort of a karma thing.Originally posted by: Crimson
Harvey doesn't seem to want to answer this..Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
So how is it you get away with so much personal abuse in this forum that would have others banned or warned at the very least, Harvey? Hmmmm? Want to tell us your secret?
:roll:
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: totalcommand
...
A covert agent is defined as someone whose identity is classified AND who has served OUTSIDE the United States within the last five years.
She's been in the US since 1997, 6 years before she was outed by Novak.
Still laughing TC?
And I repeat, Forest for the Trees.
Insert the words 'some of' between 'with' and 'those'.Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Odd how I can have reasoned discussions with those of the left on this forum who don't feel it necessary to attack me personally in every post. Maybe you should make note of that?
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Prove me wrong instead of wasting two paragaphs huffing and puffing out your chest and acting like a blithering idiot parroting the meme of the left, as you usually do.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
I am. Even if it is true she was moved back to a permanent station in the U.S. in 1997 -- unproven -- that doesn't remotely suggest she didn't still make "OUTSIDE" trips as part of her job. Your BushCo talking point, while dutifully parroted, is speculative at best (isn't that what you keep attacking everyone else for?) based on the little information you have.
Further, they just mentioned that very BushCo talking point on the NBC News. NBC reported that officials dismissed that excuse, affirming Plame was, in fact, still considered to be working in a covert role. I assume there will be linkable documentation available soon, offering more detail than NBC's on-air report. Based on the evidence we already have, however, I think we can consider that specific excuse as about to disintegrate ... just like the rest of your official progaganda.
You got nothing.
Originally posted by: Hafen
So you disagree with my assessment? Or what exactly are you saying? All I see is a little blurb that makes no sense.Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: totalcommand
...
A covert agent is defined as someone whose identity is classified AND who has served OUTSIDE the United States within the last five years.
She's been in the US since 1997, 6 years before she was outed by Novak.
Still laughing TC?
And I repeat, Forest for the Trees.
:roll:Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Claims the guy who gratuitously attacks me virtually every time he replies.
Odd how I can have reasoned discussions with those of the left on this forum who don't feel it necessary to attack me personally in every post. Maybe you should make note of that?
And there you go with the weak "party line" and "BushCo court jester" accusations once again.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Prove me wrong instead of wasting two paragaphs huffing and puffing out your chest and acting like a blithering idiot parroting the meme of the left, as you usually do.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
I am. Even if it is true she was moved back to a permanent station in the U.S. in 1997 -- unproven -- that doesn't remotely suggest she didn't still make "OUTSIDE" trips as part of her job. Your BushCo talking point, while dutifully parroted, is speculative at best (isn't that what you keep attacking everyone else for?) based on the little information you have.
Further, they just mentioned that very BushCo talking point on the NBC News. NBC reported that officials dismissed that excuse, affirming Plame was, in fact, still considered to be working in a covert role. I assume there will be linkable documentation available soon, offering more detail than NBC's on-air report. Based on the evidence we already have, however, I think we can consider that specific excuse as about to disintegrate ... just like the rest of your official progaganda.
You got nothing.
Exactly what I'm talking about Crimson. I post two points, one a hypothesis which potentially refutes Chicken's latest speculation (and dually authorized BushCo talking point), and the other a bit of new information which also potentially refutes the same point. Rather than responding to either, he attacks me with a typical witless, childish, and ultimately empty personal attack.
TLC is the biggest Bush shill in P&N, constantly dumping 100% BushCo party line propaganda points in every thread even remotely critical of Bush while he shamelessly accuses others of his own M.O.: partisan shilling, "huffing and puffing", spreading disinformation, and generally being a blithering idiot and "belligerent fvckwit". He is the BushCo court jester, and he has earned all the derision he receives a hundred times over. It's easy to envision Chicken approaching a lake, then squawking and flapping and generally making a total fool of himself while he scolds his reflection in the water.
Hmmm:Originally posted by: Bowfinger
:roll:Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Claims the guy who gratuitously attacks me virtually every time he replies.
Odd how I can have reasoned discussions with those of the left on this forum who don't feel it necessary to attack me personally in every post. Maybe you should make note of that?
Who? Your whole shtick is name-calling and attacking others. Look at how many dozen times you've done it in this thread alone, often with no provocation whatsoever. You reap what you sow.
Sorry Chicken, but they are the BushCo talking points, practically verbatim. Further, virtually everything you post is BushCo propaganda, even while you cry about how you're such a great liberal ... a "liberal" who invariably attacks the left and embraces the right in everything you say. Actions speak louder than words; yours are those of someone who is either pathologically dishonest or totally deluded. I'm sure you don't like that truth, but I'm not going to play along with your absurd game just to hear more of the same talking points.Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
And there you go with the weak "party line" and "BushCo court jester" accusations once again.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Prove me wrong instead of wasting two paragaphs huffing and puffing out your chest and acting like a blithering idiot parroting the meme of the left, as you usually do.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
I am. Even if it is true she was moved back to a permanent station in the U.S. in 1997 -- unproven -- that doesn't remotely suggest she didn't still make "OUTSIDE" trips as part of her job. Your BushCo talking point, while dutifully parroted, is speculative at best (isn't that what you keep attacking everyone else for?) based on the little information you have.
Further, they just mentioned that very BushCo talking point on the NBC News. NBC reported that officials dismissed that excuse, affirming Plame was, in fact, still considered to be working in a covert role. I assume there will be linkable documentation available soon, offering more detail than NBC's on-air report. Based on the evidence we already have, however, I think we can consider that specific excuse as about to disintegrate ... just like the rest of your official progaganda.
You got nothing.
Exactly what I'm talking about Crimson. I post two points, one a hypothesis which potentially refutes Chicken's latest speculation (and duly authorized BushCo talking point), and the other a bit of new information which also potentially refutes the same point. Rather than responding to either, he attacks me with a typical witless, childish, and ultimately empty personal attack.
TLC is the biggest Bush shill in P&N, constantly dumping 100% BushCo party line propaganda points in every thread even remotely critical of Bush while he shamelessly accuses others of his own M.O.: partisan shilling, "huffing and puffing", spreading disinformation, and generally being a blithering idiot and "belligerent fvckwit". He is the BushCo court jester, and he has earned all the derision he receives a hundred times over. It's easy to envision Chicken approaching a lake, then squawking and flapping and generally making a total fool of himself while he scolds his reflection in the water.
Stop it with the vapid, lame accusations (which are truly poorly crafted jabs) and you won't get them in return. When you can fianlly post without your garbage included, you might actually be worth replying to. Until then, you are just worthless.
The difference is I don't deny it, I don't cry about it, and I don't use it as a diversion to evade others ... as you have over and over again when running from me (and countless others) after being cornered. Your response above is another example of exactly that.Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Hmmm:Originally posted by: Bowfinger
:roll:Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Claims the guy who gratuitously attacks me virtually every time he replies.
Odd how I can have reasoned discussions with those of the left on this forum who don't feel it necessary to attack me personally in every post. Maybe you should make note of that?
Who? Your whole shtick is name-calling and attacking others. Look at how many dozen times you've done it in this thread alone, often with no provocation whatsoever. You reap what you sow.
"and dually authorized BushCo talking point"
"TLC is the biggest Bush shill in P&N"
"partisan shilling, "huffing and puffing", spreading disinformation, and generally being a blithering idiot and "belligerent fvckwit"
"He is the BushCo court jester"
"squawking and flapping "
And this is consistent of your reply tactics. And you do it to more than me. Practically anyone who might dare to disagree with you is assaulted in this manner.
You have no room to speak whatsoever. You are the pentultimate pot calling the kettle black.
And yours are exactly DU talking points? So? Do you even have a point other than trying to malign someone or implying they can't think on their own because what they believe happens to come close to what the Republicans are saying on this issue?Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Sorry Chicken, but they are the BushCo talking points, practically verbatim. Further, virtually everything you post is BushCo propaganda, even while you cry about how you're such a great liberal ... a "liberal" who invariably attacks the left and embraces the right in everything you say. Actions speak louder than words; yours are those of someone who is either pathologically dishonest or totoally deluded. I'm sure you don't like that truth, but I'm not going to play along with your absurd game just to hear more of the same talking points.Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
And there you go with the weak "party line" and "BushCo court jester" accusations once again.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Prove me wrong instead of wasting two paragaphs huffing and puffing out your chest and acting like a blithering idiot parroting the meme of the left, as you usually do.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
I am. Even if it is true she was moved back to a permanent station in the U.S. in 1997 -- unproven -- that doesn't remotely suggest she didn't still make "OUTSIDE" trips as part of her job. Your BushCo talking point, while dutifully parroted, is speculative at best (isn't that what you keep attacking everyone else for?) based on the little information you have.
Further, they just mentioned that very BushCo talking point on the NBC News. NBC reported that officials dismissed that excuse, affirming Plame was, in fact, still considered to be working in a covert role. I assume there will be linkable documentation available soon, offering more detail than NBC's on-air report. Based on the evidence we already have, however, I think we can consider that specific excuse as about to disintegrate ... just like the rest of your official progaganda.
You got nothing.
Exactly what I'm talking about Crimson. I post two points, one a hypothesis which potentially refutes Chicken's latest speculation (and duly authorized BushCo talking point), and the other a bit of new information which also potentially refutes the same point. Rather than responding to either, he attacks me with a typical witless, childish, and ultimately empty personal attack.
TLC is the biggest Bush shill in P&N, constantly dumping 100% BushCo party line propaganda points in every thread even remotely critical of Bush while he shamelessly accuses others of his own M.O.: partisan shilling, "huffing and puffing", spreading disinformation, and generally being a blithering idiot and "belligerent fvckwit". He is the BushCo court jester, and he has earned all the derision he receives a hundred times over. It's easy to envision Chicken approaching a lake, then squawking and flapping and generally making a total fool of himself while he scolds his reflection in the water.
Stop it with the vapid, lame accusations (which are truly poorly crafted jabs) and you won't get them in return. When you can fianlly post without your garbage included, you might actually be worth replying to. Until then, you are just worthless.
If you want to be treated with more respect, earn it by departing from the party line once in a while. Show us you are actually capable og independent and critical thought. And stop with the hypocritical whinig about others who use you own tactics against you. Either take it like a man, or start leading by example.
Edit: typo in quote
1. If you say so. I've never been to DU as far as I can recall, but ...Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
And yours are exactly DU talking points? So?Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Sorry Chicken, but they are the BushCo talking points, practically verbatim. Further, virtually everything you post is BushCo propaganda, even while you cry about how you're such a great liberal ... a "liberal" who invariably attacks the left and embraces the right in everything you say. Actions speak louder than words; yours are those of someone who is either pathologically dishonest or totally deluded. I'm sure you don't like that truth, but I'm not going to play along with your absurd game just to hear more of the same talking points.
If you want to be treated with more respect, earn it by departing from the party line once in a while. Show us you are actually capable of independent and critical thought. And stop with the hypocritical whinig about others who use you own tactics against you. Either take it like a man, or start leading by example.
Edit: multiple typos
Clearly yes. Among my points is that your talking points have all been refuted, most of them repeatedly in this very thread.Do you even have a point other than trying to malign someone or implying they can't think on their own because what they believe happens to come close to what the Republicans are saying on this issue?
Nice sleight of hand there. You offered some defense before the talking points memo was exposed. That doesn't mean you didn't see earlier, unofficial efforts, especially given your first responses were the same discredited claims BushCo has been repeating for months.How about re-reading this post and finding out that I've been stating these things long before any talking point memo came out.
Note that I'm not. Note that Conjur also doesn't pretend to be a Bush supporter. The reason your posts draw attention is because of your belligerence and your unmitigated hypocrisy. Without them your posts would be as unremarkable as so many of your BushCo peers.Then notice that people like conjur are quoting links from "talkingpointmemo.com."
That would still be you, thanks.Then tell me who's regurgitating talking points, K?
I've never even seen this "talking point memo" either.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
1. If you say so. I've never been to DU as far as I can recall, but ...Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
And yours are exactly DU talking points? So?Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Sorry Chicken, but they are the BushCo talking points, practically verbatim. Further, virtually everything you post is BushCo propaganda, even while you cry about how you're such a great liberal ... a "liberal" who invariably attacks the left and embraces the right in everything you say. Actions speak louder than words; yours are those of someone who is either pathologically dishonest or totally deluded. I'm sure you don't like that truth, but I'm not going to play along with your absurd game just to hear more of the same talking points.
If you want to be treated with more respect, earn it by departing from the party line once in a while. Show us you are actually capable of independent and critical thought. And stop with the hypocritical whinig about others who use you own tactics against you. Either take it like a man, or start leading by example.
Edit: multiple typos
2. I don't pretend to be a Bush supporter
Really? Such as? If any have been refuted, it surely hasn't been done by you.Clearly yes. Among my points is that your talking points have all been refuted, most of them repeatedly in this very thread.Do you even have a point other than trying to malign someone or implying they can't think on their own because what they believe happens to come close to what the Republicans are saying on this issue?
Such as?Nice sleight of hand there. You offered some defense before the talking points memo was exposed. That doesn't mean you didn't see earlier, unofficial efforts, especially given your first responses were the same discredited claims BushCo has been repeating for months.How about re-reading this post and finding out that I've been stating these things long before any talking point memo came out.
It's nothing of the sort. The reason you and a few others in here despise me is because I expose your hypocrisy and lies so often. You're the same folks that espouse freedom of expression and dissenting viewpoint...until someone disagrees with you. Then you go off the deep end, making vapid accusations similar to -"You just have your head up Bush's ass."Note that I'm not. Note that Conjur also doesn't pretend to be a Bush supporter. The reason your posts draw attention is because of your belligerence and your unmitigated hypocrisy. Without them your posts would be as unremarkable as so many of your BushCo peers.Then notice that people like conjur are quoting links from "talkingpointmemo.com."
That would still be you, thanks.Then tell me who's regurgitating talking points, K?
"Please tell me you are not this dense." (Another TLC quote, BTW.)Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I've never even seen this "talking point memo" either.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
1. If you say so. I've never been to DU as far as I can recall, but ...Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
And yours are exactly DU talking points? So?Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Sorry Chicken, but they are the BushCo talking points, practically verbatim. Further, virtually everything you post is BushCo propaganda, even while you cry about how you're such a great liberal ... a "liberal" who invariably attacks the left and embraces the right in everything you say. Actions speak louder than words; yours are those of someone who is either pathologically dishonest or totally deluded. I'm sure you don't like that truth, but I'm not going to play along with your absurd game just to hear more of the same talking points.
If you want to be treated with more respect, earn it by departing from the party line once in a while. Show us you are actually capable of independent and critical thought. And stop with the hypocritical whinig about others who use you own tactics against you. Either take it like a man, or start leading by example.
Edit: multiple typos
2. I don't pretend to be a Bush supporter
Nor have I ever accused you of being a Bush supporter or even having pretended to be one.
Right, you'd be the last to know, but whatever helps you sleep at night. Get well soon.Really? Such as? If any have been refuted, it surely hasn't been done by you.Clearly yes. Among my points is that your talking points have all been refuted, most of them repeatedly in this very thread.Do you even have a point other than trying to malign someone or implying they can't think on their own because what they believe happens to come close to what the Republicans are saying on this issue?
Such as everything you posted in the early pages of this thread, before the memo was exposed. Pick any of your claims; I can find a right-wing blog or similar source where it appeared earlier, and usually a thread here where it was parroted.Such as?Nice sleight of hand there. You offered some defense before the talking points memo was exposed. That doesn't mean you didn't see earlier, unofficial efforts, especially given your first responses were the same discredited claims BushCo has been repeating for months.How about re-reading this post and finding out that I've been stating these things long before any talking point memo came out.
ROFLMAO!!! Now that's funny. Definitely worthy of a BushCo court jester.It's nothing of the sort. The reason you and a few others in here despise me is because I expose your hypocrisy and lies so often. You're the same folks that espouse freedom of expression and dissenting viewpoint...until someone disagrees with you. Then you go off the deep end, making vapid accusations similar to -"You just have your head up Bush's ass."Note that I'm not. Note that Conjur also doesn't pretend to be a Bush supporter. The reason your posts draw attention is because of your belligerence and your unmitigated hypocrisy. Without them your posts would be as unremarkable as so many of your BushCo peers.Then notice that people like conjur are quoting links from "talkingpointmemo.com."
Such commentary does nothing to make your point whatsoever. It's pure reactionary hyperbole and the resort of someone who's absolutely fuming, has nothing to reply with of value, and simply has to retaliate in anger.
Whatever helps you sleep at night. Get well soon.Well then you just keep on believing that. It's not the first time you'd be wrong and surely won't be the last.That would still be you, thanks.Then tell me who's regurgitating talking points, K?
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
The difference is I don't deny it, I don't cry about it, and I don't use it as a diversion to evade others ... as you have over and over again when running from me (and countless others) after being cornered. Your response above is another example of exactly that.Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Hmmm:Originally posted by: Bowfinger
:roll:Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Claims the guy who gratuitously attacks me virtually every time he replies.
Odd how I can have reasoned discussions with those of the left on this forum who don't feel it necessary to attack me personally in every post. Maybe you should make note of that?
Who? Your whole shtick is name-calling and attacking others. Look at how many dozen times you've done it in this thread alone, often with no provocation whatsoever. You reap what you sow.
"and dually authorized BushCo talking point"
"TLC is the biggest Bush shill in P&N"
"partisan shilling, "huffing and puffing", spreading disinformation, and generally being a blithering idiot and "belligerent fvckwit"
"He is the BushCo court jester"
"squawking and flapping "
And this is consistent of your reply tactics. And you do it to more than me. Practically anyone who might dare to disagree with you is assaulted in this manner.
You have no room to speak whatsoever. You are the pentultimate pot calling the kettle black.
Edit: just for the record, "huffing and puffing", "blithering idiot" and "belligerent fvckwit" are all direct quotes of you, as are accusation of being a shill and parroting talking points, to name but a very few.
( Edit 2: and damn, did I butcher the spelling of "duly" or what? )
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Sorry Chicken, but they are the BushCo talking points, practically verbatim. Further, virtually everything you post is BushCo propaganda, even while you cry about how you're such a great liberal ... a "liberal" who invariably attacks the left and embraces the right in everything you say. Actions speak louder than words; yours are those of someone who is either pathologically dishonest or totally deluded. I'm sure you don't like that truth, but I'm not going to play along with your absurd game just to hear more of the same talking points.
If you want to be treated with more respect, earn it by departing from the party line once in a while. Show us you are actually capable of independent and critical thought. And stop with the hypocritical whinig about others who use you own tactics against you. Either take it like a man, or start leading by example.
Edit: multiple typos
Noting Chicken did NOT address either point raised.Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Prove me wrong instead of wasting two paragaphs huffing and puffing out your chest and acting like a blithering idiot parroting the meme of the left, as you usually do.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
I am. Even if it is true she was moved back to a permanent station in the U.S. in 1997 -- unproven -- that doesn't remotely suggest she didn't still make "OUTSIDE" trips as part of her job. Your BushCo talking point, while dutifully parroted, is speculative at best (isn't that what you keep attacking everyone else for?) based on the little information you have.Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Please tell me you are not this dense. You posted the answer yourself and had it right in front of you, yet you're still oblivious. Let me help you out, because it's apparent you need it:
A covert agent is defined as someone whose identity is classified AND who has served OUTSIDE the United States within the last five years.
She's been in the US since 1997, 6 years before she was outed by Novak.
Still laughing TC?
Further, they just mentioned that very BushCo talking point on the NBC News. NBC reported that officials dismissed that excuse, affirming Plame was, in fact, still considered to be working in a covert role. I assume there will be linkable documentation available soon, offering more detail than NBC's on-air report. Based on the evidence we already have, however, I think we can consider that specific excuse as about to disintegrate ... just like the rest of your official progaganda.
You got nothing.
That's because you can't seperate being a liberal from being a hwak who feels this war is necessary. I've explained that numerous times in the pastbut it just doesn't seem to sink in.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
"Please tell me you are not this dense." (Another TLC quote, BTW.)Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
I've never even seen this "talking point memo" either.Originally posted by: Bowfinger
1. If you say so. I've never been to DU as far as I can recall, but ...Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
And yours are exactly DU talking points? So?Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Sorry Chicken, but they are the BushCo talking points, practically verbatim. Further, virtually everything you post is BushCo propaganda, even while you cry about how you're such a great liberal ... a "liberal" who invariably attacks the left and embraces the right in everything you say. Actions speak louder than words; yours are those of someone who is either pathologically dishonest or totally deluded. I'm sure you don't like that truth, but I'm not going to play along with your absurd game just to hear more of the same talking points.
If you want to be treated with more respect, earn it by departing from the party line once in a while. Show us you are actually capable of independent and critical thought. And stop with the hypocritical whinig about others who use you own tactics against you. Either take it like a man, or start leading by example.
Edit: multiple typos
2. I don't pretend to be a Bush supporter
Nor have I ever accused you of being a Bush supporter or even having pretended to be one.
You pretend to be a "liberal", yet all your posts toe the BushCo party line. The analogy would be for me to post my anti-Bush comments while pretending to be a Bush supporter. See how that doesn't fit? See why it is NOT hypocritical for me to consistently post anti-Bush comments since I don't pretend to be a Bush supporter, while it is for you to pretend to be a "liberal" while posting consistently anti-liberal comments? See how your reply makes absolutely no sense whatsoever
Right, you'd be the last to know, but whatever helps you sleep at night. Get well soon.[/quote]Really? Such as? If any have been refuted, it surely hasn't been done by you.Clearly yes. Among my points is that your talking points have all been refuted, most of them repeatedly in this very thread.Do you even have a point other than trying to malign someone or implying they can't think on their own because what they believe happens to come close to what the Republicans are saying on this issue?
Such as everything you posted in the early pages of this thread, before the memo was exposed. Pick any of your claims; I can find a right-wing blog or similar source where it appeared earlier, and usually a thread here where it was parroted.[/quote]Such as?Nice sleight of hand there. You offered some defense before the talking points memo was exposed. That doesn't mean you didn't see earlier, unofficial efforts, especially given your first responses were the same discredited claims BushCo has been repeating for months.How about re-reading this post and finding out that I've been stating these things long before any talking point memo came out.
ROFLMAO!!! Now that's funny. Definitely worthy of a BushCo court jester.[/quote]It's nothing of the sort. The reason you and a few others in here despise me is because I expose your hypocrisy and lies so often. You're the same folks that espouse freedom of expression and dissenting viewpoint...until someone disagrees with you. Then you go off the deep end, making vapid accusations similar to -"You just have your head up Bush's ass."Note that I'm not. Note that Conjur also doesn't pretend to be a Bush supporter. The reason your posts draw attention is because of your belligerence and your unmitigated hypocrisy. Without them your posts would be as unremarkable as so many of your BushCo peers.Then notice that people like conjur are quoting links from "talkingpointmemo.com."
Such commentary does nothing to make your point whatsoever. It's pure reactionary hyperbole and the resort of someone who's absolutely fuming, has nothing to reply with of value, and simply has to retaliate in anger.
You sure seem to be implying it with all your vapid accusations.By the way, care to show me where I've ever suggested you don't have the right to say whatever you choose (subject to the indulgence of the mods, of course)? Just don't get pissy with us when we point out how full of it you are.
Whatever helps you sleep at night. Get well soon.Well then you just keep on believing that. It's not the first time you'd be wrong and surely won't be the last.That would still be you, thanks.Then tell me who's regurgitating talking points, K?