No I can. The government should be doing all they can to keep what they feel is necessary secret within the rule of law. The news agencies (I consider wikileaks a news agency) should be doing all they can to uncover truth and expose wrong doing.
That is what I"m saying.
Again, if he's punished for revealing secrets
that show wrongdoing, how is it fair to punish him? I understand that as an institution, the military
should have systems in place to protect secrets and punish those who reveal such secrets. I completely support that. That's fine as long as those secrets are legitimate, i.e. they contain information about morally and ethically acceptable conduct by the military.
BUT, what if the secrets show wrongdoing? What happens to a person leaking
these kinds of secrets? Should he still be punished even though, in this case, he would be exposing immoral/unethical/unconstitutional acts committed by the organization? If you say yes, then I come back to what I said earlier:
"how else would information get out? As you said, you clearly support organizations like Wikileaks but how will they get their hands on such information if whistle-blowers are dealt with so harshly. In such a situation, no one will come forward until AFTER it's too late."