You do realize that after he was asked to provide proof, eskimospy, in his very next post, provided proof.
Good job making yourself look like an idiot though!
he never has any. he just makes it up always asking questions and never answering. typical progressive-statist - Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
IF he gets confirmed the railing can continue until & through midterms, GOP will lose all its female voters, it will be murder. The SC situation can be fixed later, Kavanaugh impeached sidelong with Trump.
I did not know you could impeach a member of the scotus.
2/3 vote in Senate to convict was the discussion earlier. Really high bar.
More realistic would be declaring the court illegitimate (this puts in the nail in the coffin) and just pack the court ASAP.
All pretense of thoughtful jurisprudence by the court has been throughly destroyed by McConnell.
Best bet is to just burn it down and hasten reform.
You do realize that after he was asked to provide proof, eskimospy, in his very next post, provided proof.
Good job making yourself look like an idiot though!
That sounds like familiar defense. I guess he is guilty.
Sorry, i have no idea what "confession" you're talking about? Was it signed? In Court?The guy you’re talking about hasn’t had anything in a court of law yet you find it credible. Therefore you must find Trump’s taped confession about being a serial sex criminal far more credible.
Can you confirm?
Never mind, answered later.I did not know you could impeach a member of the scotus.
Yep, it's in Republican best interest to preserve the legitimacy of the court.2/3 vote in Senate to convict was the discussion earlier. Really high bar.
More realistic would be declaring the court illegitimate (this puts in the nail in the coffin) and just pack the court ASAP.
All pretense of thoughtful jurisprudence by the court has been throughly destroyed by McConnell.
Best bet is to just burn it down and hasten reform.
that is not proof, simply assumptions and speculationYou do realize that after he was asked to provide proof, eskimospy, in his very next post, provided proof.
Good job making yourself look like an idiot though!
They already control it. They have at least since I was born.Yep, it's in Republican best interest to preserve the legitimacy of the court.
Since you claim they already control it, why hasn't it happened in the 12 or 14 years you've been alive. Could it be because what you claim isn't accurate?They already control it. They have at least since I was born.
What they want is absolute control - The ability to drive through any insane policy they want. Force christianity into public schools? Make christianity the state religion? You bet they would. They might even subsequently add religiosity tests for judicial appointments or something to solidify their stranglehold over the government.
The problem for conservatives is their insane policies don't work for the vast majority of the people, and it's becoming impossible to hide. Most regimes who think they are in absolute control collapse because of that simple problem.They already control it. They have at least since I was born.
What they want is absolute control - The ability to drive through any insane policy they want. Force christianity into public schools? Make christianity the state religion? You bet they would. They might even subsequently add religiosity tests for judicial appointments or something to solidify their stranglehold over the government.
Yes, he claims he didn't do it. He categorically denied ever committing a sexual assault. Obviously he's guilty.
Millions of dollars in book deals when it's all over and done? Enhanced prestige in the activist political world? Speaking tours?What is there for Dr Ford or others to gain? For women to throw themselves into the wolfs exposing herself isn't fun, they're not like Stormy that have a lot to gain. I am not saying he did or did not had an ugly past, but it worth take a deeper look than just he said she said right? Looking to get lay at a party is one thing, taking adv of a drunk or using force is totally NOT OK. At the very least put him under oath and ask a few questions. This is a fking life time appointment.
Millions of dollars in book deals when it's all over and done? Enhanced prestige in the activist political world? Speaking tours?
So, WaPo is reporting that the female sex crimes prosecutor Republicans are bringing to question Ford is...Rachel Mitchell from Maricopa County in AZ.
Hmm...Maricopa County...Arpaio Country? Don't know if she was connected to the MCSO's mishandling of hundreds of sex crimes cases a few years back. But they had to go to AZ to find someone?
Are Democrats also allowed to bring in a sex crime prosecutor to question Kavanaugh?So, WaPo is reporting that the female sex crimes prosecutor Republicans are bringing to question Ford is...Rachel Mitchell from Maricopa County in AZ.
Hmm...Maricopa County...Arpaio Country? Don't know if she was connected to the MCSO's mishandling of hundreds of sex crimes cases a few years back. But they had to go to AZ to find someone?
Get him under oath. Then
Are Democrats also allowed to bring in a sex crime prosecutor to question Kavanaugh?
That is what is happening Thursday, for both. They will be under oath and questioned by an experienced female sexual assault prosecutor rather than have 11 old white guys do the questioning.What is there for Dr Ford or others to gain? For women to throw themselves into the wolfs exposing herself isn't fun, they're not like Stormy that have a lot to gain. I am not saying he did or did not had an ugly past, but it worth take a deeper look than just he said she said right? Looking to get lay at a party is one thing, taking adv of a drunk or using force is totally NOT OK. At the very least put him under oath and ask a few questions. This is a fking life time appointment.
They can do whatever they want. Most likely, the Democrats on the committee will softball her and make a number of speeches that in essence support her rather than try through questioning to determine the underlying facts.Get him under oath. Then
Are Democrats also allowed to bring in a sex crime prosecutor to question Kavanaugh?
Sorry, i have no idea what "confession" you're talking about? Was it signed? In Court?
Get him under oath. Then
Are Democrats also allowed to bring in a sex crime prosecutor to question Kavanaugh?