Kavanaugh SCOTUS Senate Judicial Hearing

[UNCjigga]

If I'm Brett Kavanaugh right now and I'm 100% innocent of all these allegations, I would publicly demand the following:

- Kindly request that Committee delays the hearing set for tomorrow, in order to gather evidence, witnesses or sworn statements to clear my name (including from Mark Judge)

- Ask that any investigators involved in the background check provide any and all information they gathered AND ask for an FBI Investigation into all the allegations

- Ask Senate to delay a vote until my name is fully cleared

 

[Indus]

I bet the Turtle's head just retreated into his shell...

LOL so how many posts were made on Kav's behalf defending him? LOL @ that energy WASTED!.. but I bet they still try to confirm him ASAP. It's important to have SCOTUS and the traitors from investigating die fuhrer Trump!

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

So his allegations against Trump were true... so ipso facto, Kavanaugh is also guilty?

No. It's about someone without credibility attacking Avenatti by using examples of the latter lying by citing what Avenatti proved true.

Oh, Avenatti responded to Trump.

“False accusations?” Like those crimes your fixer Cohen pled to? You are an habitual liar and complete narcissist who also is a disgrace as a president and an embarrassment to our nation. You are so inept that your “best and brightest” are Cohen and Giuliani. Let’s go."

 

[HomerJS]

Gosh, only a quarter of a century past the time she alleges the assault happened.

I guess you wouldn't care about 10 year old boys who got hand jobs from priests and were too traumatized to talk about it as well?

 

[imported_tajmahal]

I guess you wouldn't care about 10 year old boys who got hand jobs from priests and were too traumatized to talk about it as well?

I didn't know she was 10. That changes everything.

 

[vi edit]

No. It's about someone without credibility attacking Avenatti by using examples of the latter lying by citing what Avenatti proved true.

Oh, Avenatti responded to Trump.

“False accusations?” Like those crimes your fixer Cohen pled to? You are an habitual liar and complete narcissist who also is a disgrace as a president and an embarrassment to our nation. You are so inept that your “best and brightest” are Cohen and Giuliani. Let’s go."

Wow. Now that's a response.

 

[HomerJS]

Ask yourself why the Republicans would not want an FBI investigation.

New Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick details parties where girls allegedly were drugged and raped
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/26/michael-avenatti-identifies-kavanaugh-accuser-as-julie-swetnick.html

According to Tajy it was 25 years ago so we can't believe it.

 

[Starbuck1975]

Don't you think being a liar should disqualify him from holding the position of SCJ?

He was disqualified based off the hearings from weeks ago, but the Democrats failed to land a knockout blow and then it became a #metoo thing.

I lost interest in Kavanaugh when he failed to articulate what the 1st amendment meant to him.

 

[Bitek]

If it falls apart, he was just legal council working on behalf of his client. Ms Swetnick is the one with her career and future on the line.

I think the stakes are much higher.

He injected himself into this process, flamboyantly so.

At this time, it's by no means certain that Kav-bro gets confirmed.

The only face-saving shot Rs have is for Ford to not look credible.

By adding in doubtful or false allegations, it immediately undermines Ford and gives strength to the Trump argument she's lying/mixed up/ leftist conspiracy.

It's close enough it would likely work.

Avenatti will be blamed for all of it. Story will be K will be court due to his grandstanding interference.

He will find no allies willing to back him. He's finished.

 

[HomerJS]

I didn't know she was 10. That changes everything.

Really? The fact Ford was 15 changes everything?

 

[Bitek]

Yes he is disqualified at this point. He was disqualified based off the hearings from weeks ago.

Yet you, like the Rs, have spent the time since digging in.

People don't forget.

I get their game. I don't understand yours here.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

According to Tajy it was 25 years ago so we can't believe it.

Not accurate. The article you're referring to is not the one that concerns the 25 year old comment, that was when Dr. Ford told anyone else about her accusations. The Avenetti woman's claim comes in at 36 years ago.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Really? The fact Ford was 15 changes everything?

Ohh , yes.

 

[HomerJS]

Like him or not, Avenatti just dropped the fucking hammer.

Wait, I thought he was just a "porn lawyer"

 

[UNCjigga]

No. It's about someone without credibility attacking Avenatti by using examples of the latter lying by citing what Avenatti proved true.

Oh, Avenatti responded to Trump.

“False accusations?” Like those crimes your fixer Cohen pled to? You are an habitual liar and complete narcissist who also is a disgrace as a president and an embarrassment to our nation. You are so inept that your “best and brightest” are Cohen and Giuliani. Let’s go."

Two apes flinging feces at one another.

 

[cytg111]

He's already at it.

This is after Stormy has given a first hand close up description of his micro penis... Donald Trump just pisses into the wind of facts and no shits were given. Fuck reality. I roll my own.
Daaaaaaaamn.

 

[Jimzz]

And people were wondering why the GOP is trying to rush this through. Let alone why Mark Judge is in hiding and the republicans are not trying to call him to clear Kavanaugh.

 

[HomerJS]

Not accurate. The article you're referring to is not the one that concerns the 25 year old comment, that was when Dr. Ford told anyone else about her accusations. The Avenetti woman's claim comes in at 36 years ago.

Article refers to Ford confessing to someone in 2013 about an incident that happened 36 years ago. That invalidates any conspiracy theory about Ford lying to derail SCOTUS nominee

 

[HomerJS]

Think its obvious now that when the Drumpf sends his people, he is not sending the best. They're bringing treason. They're bringing corruption. They're bringing crime. They're warmongers. They're rapists. They're neo-nazis. And some, I assume, are good people.

Well said

 

[UNCjigga]

Looks like something new may have come out about Kavanaugh lying to the Senate. Apparently he may have breached grand jury secrecy rules. When asked about it he denied it but apparently a memo has surfaced showing that he did.

Dems are seeking injunction in court to stop nomination on these grounds...has nothing to do with allegations. But some wood see that as a sign they're afraid to "lose" the hearing tomorrow.

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

And people were wondering why the GOP is trying to rush this through. Let alone why Mark Judge is in hiding and the republicans are not trying to call him to clear Kavanaugh.

The Reps may get Kavanaugh through the committee but if Avenatti's client is credible then things aren't going to go swimmingly for the prospective jurist.

 

[Bitek]

If I'm Brett Kavanaugh right now and I'm 100% innocent of all these allegations, I would publicly demand the following:

- Kindly request that Committee delays the hearing set for tomorrow, in order to gather evidence, witnesses or sworn statements to clear my name (including from Mark Judge)

- Ask that any investigators involved in the background check provide any and all information they gathered AND ask for an FBI Investigation into all the allegations

- Ask Senate to delay a vote until my name is fully cleared

Strange he didn't do that days ago?

Instead of going on fox news proclaiming he was a virgin that never drank until he got the legal age of 18?

Hmm. What to make of that?

 

[ElFenix]

When Georgetown Prep sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists.

And some, I assume, are good people.

/shamelessly stolen

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Article refers to Ford confessing to someone in 2013 about an incident that happened 36 years ago. That invalidates any conspiracy theory about Ford lying to derail SCOTUS nominee

Yes, but has nothing to do with the accuracy of the statement.

 

[Bitek]

Dems are seeking injunction in court to stop nomination on these grounds...has nothing to do with allegations. But some wood see that as a sign they're afraid to "lose" the hearing tomorrow.

It's boss battle time. Don't stop pulling until the clip is empty.