pcgeek11
Lifer
- Jun 12, 2005
- 21,616
- 4,671
- 136
You know what else has consequences...
The 2nd amendment...
OK
You know what else has consequences...
The 2nd amendment...
Those uppity folks just want to cause trouble.There is / was nothing to concede. So you are wrong. I'm not arguing at all. You think it is OK to break the law and I disagree.
There is / was nothing to concede. So you are wrong. I'm not arguing at all. You think it is OK to break the law and I disagree.
Some forms of birth control are abortion inducing drugs.
“Abortion pill” is the popular name for using two different medicines to end a pregnancy: mifepristone and misoprostol.
https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/abortion/the-abortion-pill
Why should they ? To make Democrats happy? How about they tell the Democrats go take a flying fvck at a rolling doughnut instead?
I'd approve that message.
Those uppity folks just want to cause trouble.
There is / was nothing to concede. So you are wrong. I'm not arguing at all. You think it is OK to break the law and I disagree.
So you disagree that an act of civil disobedience could ever be the right thing to do? In Nazi Germany, it was against the law to hide Jews or in any way try to thwart their deportation to the camps. I assume you would be critical of that too?
I think you're taking an extreme position here. You're also mischaracterizing another poster's opinion as thinking it's OK to break the law as a general proposition. Just because you're at an extreme here doesn't mean the other guy is at the opposite extreme.
Some forms of birth control are abortion inducing drugs.
“Abortion pill” is the popular name for using two different medicines to end a pregnancy: mifepristone and misoprostol.
https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/abortion/the-abortion-pill
It is settled law. Settled law can also change. He won’t say he won’t change it because that would be inappropriate. Gotcha questions may make for good political theater or further the political ambitions of certain Senators, but that’s about it.Kavanaugh's answers are mealy mouthed obfuscation. He says Roe v Wade is settled law yet affirms the ability of the SCOTUS to change it. He won't say "I wouldn't change it" because that would be a lie.
Stop copying my posts, you filthy plagiarizer. Seriously though, we basically posted the exact same thing, you were just a tad later than I was.
WTF. I swear I did not see your post and yet you used the exact same example that I did. I had actually considered using the example of Jim Crow laws but settled on the Nazi example instead.
Birth control is not an abortion.
Birth control prevents conception.
Abortion terminates an established pregnancy
Mifepristone and misoprostol are not birth control. They end a pregnancy.
You are like the poster child for abstinence only education.
The GOP is just trying to quickly install a stealth ideologue on the court while he still has some camouflage. With only 51 votes, of course.
Authoritarian. Through and through.I agree with you on this point.
I commend the capital police on getting these assholes arrested and out asap when they disrupt the hearing.
Again, why should the Republicans go out of their way to provide Democrats with anything they don't have to provide by law? Why do anything at all to help and not hinder their political opponents?Because such document releases are customary when considering confirmation to the SCOTUS. Like always. There's just a lot more information about Kavanaugh than any previous nominee & it hasn't become available to the Senate. Confirmation is a very serious matter considering that Justices often serve 30 years or more. There wasn't any hurry to deal with Garland, was there? Why the hurry now when they'll have time in the lame duck session after the election?
The GOP is just trying to quickly install a stealth ideologue on the court while he still has some camouflage. With only 51 votes, of course.
You are a dance instructor.It is settled law. Settled law can also change. He won’t say he won’t change it because that would be inappropriate. Gotcha questions may make for good political theater or further the political ambitions of certain Senators, but that’s about it.
this sucks, can we go back talking about pubes on coke cans at hearings?
So you disagree that an act of civil disobedience could ever be the right thing to do? In Nazi Germany, it was against the law to hide Jews or in any way try to thwart their deportation to the camps. I assume you would be critical of that too?
I think you're taking an extreme position here. You're also mischaracterizing another poster's opinion as thinking it's OK to break the law as a general proposition. Just because you're at an extreme here doesn't mean the other guy is at the opposite extreme.
It is settled law. Settled law can also change. He won’t say he won’t change it because that would be inappropriate. Gotcha questions may make for good political theater or further the political ambitions of certain Senators, but that’s about it.
You are bringing up Nazi and people hiding Jewish people from being murdered and you say that I'm in the extreme?
You are being silly. There is no comparison between people screaming at a hearing and disturbing the peace and people hiding Jews against the Nazi's butchery.
Which laws do people have to obey?You are bringing up Nazi and people hiding Jewish people from being murdered and you say that I'm in the extreme?
You are being silly. There is no comparison between people screaming at a hearing and disturbing the peace and people hiding Jews against the Nazi's butchery.
You are bringing up Nazi and people hiding Jewish people from being murdered and you say that I'm in the extreme?
You are being silly. There is no comparison between people screaming at a hearing and disturbing the peace and people hiding Jews against the Nazi's butchery.