Talking to you is like talking to a 3rd grader. Your comparison is in the extreme and not worthy of a comment.
You opened that door, idiot, by making absolute statements like "breaking the law is wrong". Whether you like it or not the people that were hiding Jews were, in fact, breaking the law. So according to your own words, they were in the wrong.
See how stupid your argument is? Now hold this L.
Which laws do people have to obey?
Talking to you is like talking to a 3rd grader. Your comparison is in the extreme and not worthy of a comment.
Again, why should the Republicans go out of their way to provide Democrats with anything they don't have to provide by law? Why do anything at all to help and not hinder their political opponents?
Screw the Democrats because the Democrats are doing everything in their power to screw the Republicans.
Actually, the comparison is quite valid, given your prior comment. You framed this as, you are either OK with breaking the law (him) or you aren't (you). That is a false dichotomy. You just implicitly admitted that it IS OK in your view, given the proper circumstances. I'm going to take a wild guess and assume that Ecogen feels exactly the same way. I purposefully chose an extreme example to illustrate that your framing of the issue was itself, extreme.
The idea behind civil disobedience is not to undermine the rule of law. That is why you are supposed to openly admit your crime (or do so in public) and accept the penalty. Other than in a Nazi situation where doing so would get people killed, of course. With that qualifier, I have no issue with civil disobedience. Just don't physically harm anyone, and accept your legal penalty and it's fine by me because that is how you use law breaking as a form of protest without undermining the rule of law.
pcgeek's record remains perfect.You don't "have to" obey any laws. You just need to be willing to accept the results of breaking the law.
You made the absolute statement that "Breaking the law" is wrong. You didn't qualify it once, after having many opportunities to do so. And you're calling me, the person who qualified his argument by saying that "sometimes breaking the law is the right thing to do" extreme.
You said something completely stupid and you got called out on it. Be man, own up to it, and move on with your life. Your attempts to somehow make this into something else are completely transparent and, frankly, pathetic.
Not unrelated at all. You are just too dense.
You don't "have to" obey any laws. You just need to be willing to accept the results of breaking the law.
I disagree that it is valid as the context of this discussion was about the protesters at the hearing.
Instead some of you want to throw in an extreme example in an attempt to get me to justify.
Not going to happen.
Lol! So now that you've admitted that they are related, why don't you explain to us what rights of others are violated by the protestors, like I asked in the first, fucking, place.
As I stated to the other poster it is about the context of this thread that we were discussing. You are the one trying to make it into something more.
It depends on the cause. Sometimes breaking the law is the only way to enact positive change. For examples you can look at the entire history of the human race.
There is / was nothing to concede. So you are wrong. I'm not arguing at all. You think it is OK to break the law and I disagree.
I'm sure the protesters knew they'd be arrested. So, what's your beef, anyway?
You didn't frame your statement in terms of this one incident. You were speaking more broadly, and you know it. You're just trying to run away from your straw mannery.
Damn that Harry Reid!
Again, why should the Republicans go out of their way to provide Democrats with anything they don't have to provide by law? Why do anything at all to help and not hinder their political opponents?
Screw the Democrats because the Democrats are doing everything in their power to screw the Republicans.
They are doing it for no good end. They aren't accomplishing anything.
So talking to a 3rd grader largely goes over your head too? I mean seriously why do you keep self owning like this, its almost like you dont like yourself... it would make sense though, you need to love yourself before you can love others.. I suggest you take some time off and work on you.Talking to you is like talking to a 3rd grader. Your comparison is in the extreme and not worthy of a comment.
I didn't say that.
They are two different statements. They are related as they both are in reference to peoples rights. Idiot.
Booker was very clear as to why he chose to release the documents. The reason is that none of these documents contained national security info or personal info. Booker was demonstrating that the Republicans are lying about the reasons they want these documents suppressed. The intent of the release wasn’t to reveal a smoking gun with respect to Kavanaugh’s radical views on presidential powers, it was to show the American people that they are being lied to by both the Trump administration and Senate Republicans.Here's Booker's link to the 4 emails he was talking about. Looks like he didn't read them because they show Kavanaugh is exactly the opposite of a racist.
https://www.scribd.com/document/387988906/Booker-Confidential-Kavanaugh-Hearing
Harry Reid cracked the levee and Biden is on record asserting that an election year President should not appoint to SCOTUS. Politics is a Pandora’s box.Actually, no, dumb ass. That was the Republicans. Reid ended the filibuster but only for lower court appointments because of Republican obstruction. The Republicans removed the filibuster entirely when they gained power.
Lol, the one time you could have gone, "both sides".
He answered the question, its just not the answer you want to hearThat's mealy mouthed as well. Asked for his own opinion on the matter, he expressed a non-opinion. Either he supports Roe or he doesn't & he wouldn't say. It's often referred to as weasel words.
You don't understand the context of a thread conversation. OK
He answered the question, its just not the answer you want to hear