Kavanaugh SCOTUS Senate Judicial Hearing

Page 168 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
24,941
9,228
136
Even if the committee votes against recommending Kavanaugh (they won't) I don't think that vote is binding, correct? I thought McConnell can still schedule a floor vote at any time.
 

Zstream

Diamond Member
Oct 24, 2005
3,395
277
136
Who knew they'd love Judge Whiny McTantrum?..Kavanaugh's performance today was disturbing to those who value honesty and mental stability.

I figured Kavanaugh was toast -Trump wouldn't like the crying, so therefore the Breitbart/Alex Jones followers wouldn't like it, either. I assumed that the judges on the supreme court were above believing in conspiracies, so his testimony crushed that assumption.

But I guess Trump needs Kav too much to reject him, no matter what. No one else on that Federalist Society list, apparently, has, like Kavanaugh, pledged to keep Trump safe from subpoenas and other pesky intimations that Presidents aren't above the law.

Demwars, is that you? How many conspiracies do you have in your back pocket?
 

ecogen

Golden Member
Dec 24, 2016
1,217
1,288
136
Got it. You have nothing, so you throw a tantrum. You honestly think if there was evidence that this would even go through? Just stop talking retard... it doesn’t work.

I wasn't the one you asked for evidence, I was just commenting on your "you'll get paid by the dems" part. Which is retarded.
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,040
136
Got it. You have nothing, so you throw a tantrum. You honestly think if there was evidence that this would even go through? Just stop talking retard... it doesn’t work.
GOP won't allow evidence to be gathered, ask them why there's no hard evidence, ask them why they won't let the FBI investigate this, then get back to us with your findings.
 
Reactions: darkswordsman17
Mar 11, 2004
23,280
5,722
146
Democrats lose this by their absolute Hail Mary throw to keep the Supreme Court from sliding conservative before their near guaranteed win in the midterms. This is an ugly way to destroy someone and the precedent set is essentially, someone says something bad about you no matter how long ago and we ruin you. No assumption of innocence, no trial. You are judged and ruined outside of court.

Republicans lose by nominating a rich private school boy who on face value appears to be the very representative of that preppy boy culture we nearly all despise. It’s not a huge stretch for us to believe the claims....even if we don’t or can’t practically “know” them. Also, they were put in a checkmate situation where if they don’t confirm, the voter base will never forgive them for failing to get as this is maybe the last chance to do something about roe v wade.


This is totally a political chess game and we all lose. I suppose it’s just a result of the way republican blocked Obama’s Supreme Court pick (that did happen right?)

Funny thing is, how people making accusations about old behavior seems to bring up more and more recent bad behavior by these people. But yep, its all just to tear Kavanaugh down. Maybe, I don't know, not be a piece of shit in the first place? Hell you'd have an argument if there was consistent bad behavior.

WTF kind of argument is that? The base will be mad that they couldn't get their sham candidate nominated so they could push their partisan bullshit. They better watch out those people might vote Democrat!!! That you're even framing the arguments like you are just shows that you're not even remotely considering this other than in that manner yourself.

Yep, trying to stop serial sexual abusers is just a political ploy. We lose because of people like you that care more about your political side (no matter how much you keep trying to cop this act, you consistently shown how full of shit that is) than about stuff like that.

They didn't block it, they refused to even consider it (not the same thing). But then you already know that.

Investigated by whom, and for what? What witnesses? You have any shred of evidence and we will stop arguing. Until that point STFU, and prepare for your ass party to face the same shit in a few years. Don’t play with fire if you can’t handle the hot coals. Good luck when dems are in power.

Your shitty argument just shows what a complete fraud you are. That you're assuming all the people calling for investigations would be against it if such accusations were made against a Democrat nominated candidate just shows that you're exactly what you're crying about most. Fucking hypocrites.

WOW! Not shocking on this board, but for the love of god, use some IQ.

Certainly not shocking that you can't even form anything resembling an actual argument. You just saying there is nothing to this doesn't make it true dipshit.

Realistically, how much further to the bottom is there to go in the investigation? Both seem quite believable. The evidence to support either is non-existent. What happens if both are telling the truth?

Republicans have definitely lost the short game here. My argument is long game I think Democrats are playing with fire, even if the game of court control is won.

I don't know, how many more women are going to come forward and accuse Kavanaugh of this type of behavior? Maybe don't nominate despicable people if you're having such a problem with them being found out for being despicable?

I like how you guys act like this is going to cause huge hellfire backlash for Democrats and act like we should all be worried like we're the ones being partisan dumbfucks for giving a shit that someone being nominated for government positions might be fucking sexual predators (FYI, I wasn't old enough to vote when Clinton was in office so you can go fuck yourself if you try to claim that I "didn't care" about him; which of course funny how you fucking twits care so much about Clinton but don't give a shit about Kavanaugh, or Turmp, or Roy Moore, or the seemingly endless parade of Republicans).
 

FIVR

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2016
3,753
911
106
Democrats lose this by their absolute Hail Mary throw to keep the Supreme Court from sliding conservative before their near guaranteed win in the midterms. This is an ugly way to destroy someone and the precedent set is essentially, someone says something bad about you no matter how long ago and we ruin you. No assumption of innocence, no trial. You are judged and ruined outside of court.

Republicans lose by nominating a rich private school boy who on face value appears to be the very representative of that preppy boy culture we nearly all despise. It’s not a huge stretch for us to believe the claims....even if we don’t or can’t practically “know” them. Also, they were put in a checkmate situation where if they don’t confirm, the voter base will never forgive them for failing to get as this is maybe the last chance to do something about roe v wade.


This is totally a political chess game and we all lose. I suppose it’s just a result of the way republican blocked Obama’s Supreme Court pick (that did happen right?)

Keep pretending that the Republicans didn't already destroy due process in Supreme Court nominations when they refused to even meet with Merrick Garland

 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
38,426
8,712
136
Credible means believable. Although all we'll probably end up with is each person under oath accusing the other of lying under oath. But it's as good as we may get.
No. There's a lot more to this than he said, she said. She gains nothing by lying, or even coming forward. He sustains a career making job. What is more, 6 years ago she explained the event to her therapist. This when Kavanaugh was miles from a SCOTUS appointment. How do you explain that? I have no doubt concerning what's going on here. The fact that you do makes me suspicious of you. Actually, it convinces me that you are OK with obfuscation and prevarication. Shame on you. And shame, shame, shame on the Republican Party.

If the onus sticks on KIavanaugh here he will probably not even stay on the Circuit Court of Appeals.
 
Reactions: darkswordsman17

Zstream

Diamond Member
Oct 24, 2005
3,395
277
136
GOP won't allow evidence to be gathered, ask them why there's no hard evidence, ask them why they won't let the FBI investigate this, then get back to us with your findings.

Won’t allow? Did you not watch anything, or read the details? The committee wasn’t even allowed to investigate. Ask the lady herself who just testified! She said she couldn’t attend because she was afraid of flights. She fucking flew everywhere, on vacations, work etc... How long did your Dem minority sit in hiding with the news, with weeks to investigate? I’m not about to chat with anymore of you morons. I wish there was a libertarian board, but alas, taken over by retards in both sides.

In fact, they even wanted to fly to her! God, our republic is doomed with you tards. I can’t even think half of you are from the states, if you are, you would fear what just happened.
 

Zstream

Diamond Member
Oct 24, 2005
3,395
277
136
No. There's a lot more to this than he said, she said. She gains nothing by lying, or even coming forward. He sustains a career making job. What is more, 6 years ago she explained the event to her therapist. This when Kavanaugh was miles from a SCOTUS appointment. How do you explain that? I have no doubt concerning what's going on here. The fact that you do makes me suspicious of you. Actually, it convinces me that you are OK with obfuscation and prevarication. Shame on you. And shame, shame, shame on the Republican Party

You clearly didn’t watch the event. She never said his name, in any session.
 

ecogen

Golden Member
Dec 24, 2016
1,217
1,288
136
Won’t allow? Did you not watch anything, or read the details? The committee wasn’t even allowed to investigate. Ask the lady herself who just testified! She said she couldn’t attend because she was afraid of flights. She fucking flew everywhere, on vacations, work etc... How long did your Dem minority sit in hiding with the news, with weeks to investigate? I’m not about to chat with anymore of you morons. I wish there was a libertarian board, but alas, taken over by retards in both sides.

Just to determine exactly how retarded you are, do you support libertarian economic policies like privatizing everything and complete deregulation?
 

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,788
6,040
136
Won’t allow? Did you not watch anything, or read the details? The committee wasn’t even allowed to investigate. Ask the lady herself who just testified! She said she couldn’t attend because she was afraid of flights. She fucking flew everywhere, on vacations, work etc... How long did your Dem minority sit in hiding with the news, with weeks to investigate? I’m not about to chat with anymore of you morons. I wish there was a libertarian board, but alas, taken over by retards in both sides.

In fact, they even wanted to fly to her! God, our republic is doomed with you tards. I can’t even think half of you are from the states, if you are, you would fear what just happened.
Yes, the GOP will not allow the FBI to investigate her allegations nor the other women who have come forward. If you have proof otherwise show it. I watched the entire hearing and they (GOP majority) refused every time they were asked. So did Kavanaugh.
 
Reactions: ivwshane

Zstream

Diamond Member
Oct 24, 2005
3,395
277
136
Yes, the GOP will not allow the FBI to investigate her allegations nor the other women who have come forward. If you have proof otherwise show it. I watched the entire hearing and they (GOP majority) refused every time they were asked.

The fact this was known for over a 45 days, without your minority leader calling for an investigation is all we need to know. Why didn’t she ask for an investigation when she received the letter?

Prove what? You can’t prove a negative!
 
Mar 11, 2004
23,280
5,722
146
Their stories are mutually incompatible so they can’t both be telling the truth. As for evidence, that’s why you have an investigation. That’s why you call the other person Ford says was there in to testify. Republicans refuse to do this.



I’m struggling to see why bringing up accusations of felonies that you agree are believable is playing with fire. If they are credible, they should be brought up.

Yep. If that doesn't show that he's operating on an incredibly fucked up basis for his logic. Gotta love how they try to act like everyone else is doing what they complain about though. But that's typical for hypocrites that think everyone else operates on the same distorted logic they do.

Trump should have done extreme vetting on Kav...

He should've done much more vetting on basically everyone, and the Republican party should have done more vetting on him (along with a lot of other people they have gotten involved with), and the American people should be doing more vetting of the people they put in power.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |