zinfamous
No Lifer
- Jul 12, 2006
- 110,820
- 29,571
- 146
Fuck the Socialists, and post modern Marxist!
lol. something woke the Krakken.
Fuck the Socialists, and post modern Marxist!
Not that anyone will change their minds but for what its worth here is my take after watching the entire session
Dr Ford was very credible and told a story she firmly believed was true.
Judge Kavanaugh was very credible and told a story he believed to be true.
Both testified under oath.
So for me, what has to be the deciding factor in this hearing? I believe, even more than yesterday, something happened to Dr Ford but whatever that was, it did not involve Judge Kavanaugh. The primary reason for my conclusion is there simply was no contemporary corroborating evidence Dr Ford could provide today.
No doubt, Dr Ford absolutely believes Judge Kavanaugh assaulted her. I believe she believes that. But the contemporary witnesses she provided have all under oath denied knowledge of the incident.
Not that anyone will change their minds but for what its worth here is my take after watching the entire session
Dr Ford was very credible and told a story she firmly believed was true.
Judge Kavanaugh was very credible and told a story he believed to be true.
Both testified under oath.
So for me, what has to be the deciding factor in this hearing? I believe, even more than yesterday, something happened to Dr Ford but whatever that was, it did not involve Judge Kavanaugh. The primary reason for my conclusion is there simply was no contemporary corroborating evidence Dr Ford could provide today.
No doubt, Dr Ford absolutely believes Judge Kavanaugh assaulted her. I believe she believes that. But the contemporary witnesses she provided have all under oath denied knowledge of the incident.
Yes it does.
Good luck with convincing anyone. This will be the new standard and a huge negative for the republic. I fear for my family, and friends, as this is leading to a civil war.
Democrats think they have a win, Republicans have a short term loss, but in the end, the same tactic used today, will be used by both parties now.
The people on this board are way to partisan to even debate with. You get nowhere, and they get pats on their back from “the good side”.
You're not that good looking.Huh? Eviction disprove something? I say you raped me, now prove you didn’t.
He's now an official Trumper. That's who he is. They consider this normal. They all hate it, but it's all their fault.
Fuck the Trumpers. Fuck them all to hell.
Pretty much this. One vote tomorrow, when Kavanaugh wins 11-10 it'll be a floor vote on Tues. or Wed. most likely. I think Kavanaugh will be confirmed 53 to 47. Even if he loses it'll take about 1 to 2 weeks for a new nominee and about a 6 week wait for hearings in Dec.I was thinking the same thing. McConnell has the votes or he doesn’t. Either way the only way they lose is if they don’t have some republican in the SCOTUS seat by Jan 20 if they lose on Nov.
Moving forward now buys him a few more weeks to deal with the inevitable future fuckups if they have to try to seat the next candidate.
The Republicans stopped using her when she was too tough on Kavanaugh and not allowing him to rant and filibuster and deflect.Can someone educate me on the following? I was rather impressed at how impartial the 'prosecutor' was. She's definitely not acting. And as we all saw, questions were equal and fair to both parties.
My biggest point is this, why is Kevanaugh evading FBI background check in mere 1 week to clear his name? That's notably contradictory.
SCOTUS justices have their own personal interests. There's one who likes pornography (Thomas, and that came out back in the hearings for him.) And now we'll have one who likes to cry. Nothing really that wrong with either one. I do both, I watch porn and I cry watching sad movies. I even cry at the end of Undercover Boss tv shows when the boss rescues a few employees from financial disaster by buying them a car, a house or tuiton. Which has the lucky employee in tears of joy which makes me cry.
Anyway on a more practical note imo if Kavanaugh is rejected then Trump will probably nominate a more conservative person knowing it's unlikely that today's debacle will be repeated.
Ah dang forgot to add that people who say lie detector tests are not admissible in court in the same sentence when they say they're also unreliable usually look like they're trying to hide something. I know both are true but come on we see this so much. The ones who pass the tests say they are wonderful tools and the ones who refuse to take them for the two reasons stated above seem suspect to a large portion of the population.
The FBI thing is such a joke. If democrats cared about Ford this would've been brought up when the allegation was raised with Feinstein. Everyone knows the FBI angle is useful because it delays things indefinitely. That's it.
Or as Ben Shapiro put it:
"Why won't you ask the FBI to delay your confirmation vote based on allegations you say are complete nonsense in order to give Democrats time to push off your nomination beyond the election, thus surrendering your nomination?"
haha oh whatever dude. Please elaborate on how I lie to myself.
This is the best of both worlds. We get to impeach Kavanaugh after the midterms and then pack the supreme court!
It's not like they wouldn't put some other scumbag in there before the end of the lame duck session anyway. This way we get this supreme court seat no matter what, and we probably get the senate early.
Stop being a god damn obvious idiot and fucking think for a second. There is one dude out there that could clear this rapist. but he's in hiding. lol-like it's that easy for Mark Judge to go in hiding when a small-town reporter found him after one day. You think the repubs care about this rapist's innocence and his character?
The Senate has investigated it. The Democrats could have gotten any number of investigators to check into it. From State, to District to private to Senate. Why didn't they?
Folks, I'm conservative (or rather libertarian to be more exact) and am all in favor of ousting Kavanaugh from getting on the Supreme Court after his childish performance.
But you are seriously high as fucking snorting cocaine and taking acid tabs right now if you HONESTLY believe yourself when you say that Kav can be impeached. You're simply fucking high.
Not that anyone will change their minds but for what its worth here is my take after watching the entire session
Dr Ford was very credible and told a story she firmly believed was true.
Judge Kavanaugh was very credible and told a story he believed to be true.
Both testified under oath.
So for me, what has to be the deciding factor in this hearing? I believe, even more than yesterday, something happened to Dr Ford but whatever that was, it did not involve Judge Kavanaugh. The primary reason for my conclusion is there simply was no contemporary corroborating evidence Dr Ford could provide today.
No doubt, Dr Ford absolutely believes Judge Kavanaugh assaulted her. I believe she believes that. But the contemporary witnesses she provided have all under oath denied knowledge of the incident.
Yeah, Trump the narcissistic self aggrandizing person takes orders from Putin, sure!!!! And the moon is made out of cheese!
This fake propaganda, this fake investigation might have worked if we actually had a US president who isn't so narcissistic. Trump only cares about himself, so him working with Russia or whatever is retarded. You literally have to have no brain at all, to believe the crap! Its all 100% bullshit!
Innocent until PROVEN guilty. All we've heard are wild accusations without any shred of evidence.
Why wait 36 years? He was an important person before as well, he got higher and higher in the judiciary every 5 or so years it seems, ever since the Bush era he has been climbing up and fast, why not reveal things back then?
Her story also changed so much, first she could only remember it in a session with a therapist in 2012, now she is saying she told her husband years before, so which one is it? did she have no recollection till 2012 or did she always had this memory? If she did have it even before 2012, why not say anything back then?
If she had it after why not saying anything? she's had 36 years to say something, why exactly now?
And again, INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. But we won't be able to find out if its true or not ever, because she waited 36 years and no evidence exists now, even if it potentially existed. So all she is doing smearing his name and preventing the nomination.
I feel like ultimately Trump should say fuck you do all the democrats and nominate a different candidate as a fuck you to all of them and have it expedited and done quickly and swiftly. They can't pay off enough people and quickly enough to be able to smear every single judicial candidate he nominates.
Trumo should step up though, he should order the FBI, CIA, NSA, Pentagon, Army intelligence to find the money links to these democratic party operatives, massive investigations into the money links and find out that its George Soros, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Rothschilds, Clinton crime family, etc... that subvert US democracy, NOT Russia, NOT anyone else!
Innocent until PROVEN guilty. All we've heard are wild accusations without any shred of evidence.
And again, INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty. But we won't be able to find out if its true or not ever, because she waited 36 years and no evidence exists now, even if it potentially existed. So all she is doing smearing his name and preventing the nomination.
Can someone educate me on the following? I was rather impressed at how impartial the 'prosecutor' was. She's definitely not acting. And as we all saw, questions were equal and fair to both parties.
My biggest point is this, why is Kevanaugh evading FBI background check in mere 1 week to clear his name? That's notably contradictory.
Folks, I'm conservative (or rather libertarian to be more exact) and am all in favor of ousting Kavanaugh from getting on the Supreme Court after his childish performance.
But you are seriously high as fucking snorting cocaine and taking acid tabs right now if you HONESTLY believe yourself when you say that Kav can be impeached. You're simply fucking high.
Strzok? Page?
Any investigators could find the same.
He's not, absolutely no evidence of it and the 3 witnesses that Ford named in her letter said as much under felony penalty.
If they both stick to their stories and Ford refuses to name a date or place it will always be a case of "He said, she said"